The ‘no-nonsense’ judge set to face Donald Trump in the courtroom

[DaveE13]

26 minutes ago, LaosLover said:

Do keep up. It's Marxists now as a diss in Fox-land. Communists is your father's paranoia.

 

Also: saying marxist makes them feel intelligent.

 

If you want to see stuttering and stammering at Joe Biden levels, ask them to tell the difference between marxists and communists.

Same as that stupid woman on the news channel couldn't explain what woke actually meant. And the funniest part was when she said this Is going to go viral ????   yes you fool you boasted you wrote a whole chapter on it. 

[LaosLover]

I love the correlation between Trump lovers here and getting soaked by hookers for money.

 

Short version: he really doesn't love you long-time either.

[Grusa]

I wonder if Donald is clever enough to avoid being done for contempt of court during the proceedings.....

[LosLobo]

10 minutes ago, Grusa said:

I wonder if Donald is clever enough to avoid being done for contempt of court during the proceedings.....

Trump rarely gets to be accountable with consequences for his rhetoric, its not in his playbook and he is out of his territory here. So I think he will quietly submit.

 

The scenario set by Stormy suggested someone quietly willing to bend over and take their punishment like a bad little boy.

 

This attitude will go down well with his cell mates.

[heybruce]

2 hours ago, vandeventer said:

Trump will walk away clean, again.

How do you walk away clean from a pay-off to a porn star?

[vandeventer]

3 minutes ago, heybruce said:

How do you walk away clean from a pay-off to a porn star?

It's not against the law, and what proof do you have that he did?

[transam]

2 hours ago, vandeventer said:

Trump will walk away clean, again.

Really.......................?

 

[Berkshire]

1 hour ago, LaosLover said:

I love the correlation between Trump lovers here and getting soaked by hookers for money.

 

Short version: he really doesn't love you long-time either.

Good local comparison.  But I believe Trump supporters are more like those people who fall for a Nigerian scam.  The difference is people who get conned by a Nigerian scam eventually figure it out.

[Bkk Brian]

9 minutes ago, heybruce said:

How do you walk away clean from a pay-off to a porn star?

There's a strong likelihood there are two women involved here.

 

"the grand jury has been investigating hush money payments to two women who claimed to have had with him. Details of those payments were made public only after he was elected as president in 2016. 

[LosLobo]

7 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

It's not against the law, and what proof do you have that he did?

Why did Cohen go to jail for something that was not against the law?

 

Nevertheless, the proof is that Trump did it is because he denied the allegation! 

 

What more proof does anyone need?

[vandeventer]

2 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Why did Cohen go to jail for something that was not against the law?

 

Nevertheless, the proof is that Trump did it is because he denied the allegation! 

 

What more proof does anyone need?

Again,

we will just have to wait and see if this judge just throws it all out.

[LosLobo]

2 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Again,

we will just have to wait and see if this judge just throws it all out.

"It" meaning the charges that only you, Fox and other Trump supporters already know from the advantage of being in an alternate space-time continuum?

[Phoenix Rising]

This is an urgent call to all those who trigger trump;

Get on TV and rib him mercilessly. He'll have to reply and then he's done!

I'm talking to you Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert and Alec Baldwin - go, go, go!

[ozimoron]

1 hour ago, vandeventer said:

It's not against the law, and what proof do you have that he did?

It is when you don't pay tax on it and when you use it to evade FEC laws. Then there is the check signed by DT.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/21/trump-stormy-payments/

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, vandeventer said:

It's not against the law, and what proof do you have that he did?

"In a series of early morning tweets on May 3, President Donald Trump acknowledged for the first time that he reimbursed his personal attorney for the $130,000 payment that was made to porn star Stormy Daniels." 

 

"It says that “the Company” reimbursed Cohen from the trust account created when Trump became president. “The Company accounted for these payments as legal expenses,” the criminal information said."

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/05/qa-on-stormy-daniels-payment/

 

Mislabeling the payment as a legal expense is where the law may have been broken.  I concede it's a weak case, and with so many other more substantive and better supported criminal investigations involving Trump I think it was a mistake to push this one to the front. 

 

However even it is decided that the payment wasn't illegal, I think it's a stretch to describe a person who had a fling with a porn star while his wife was recovering from giving birth to his son as being "clean" is a huge stretch.

[LosLobo]

1 hour ago, LosLobo said:

"It" meaning the charges that only you, Fox and other Trump supporters already know from the advantage of being in an alternate space-time continuum?

Just watching Fox and they say that the indictment is not sealed.

PBS and NPR the most trusted and unbiased news services in US both confirm that it is sealed.

 

The only scenario where both could be correct is my theory on the alternate space-time continuum, any other more logical theory?

 

 

[Phoenix Rising]

5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Just watching Fox and they say that the indictment is not sealed.

PBS and NPR the most trusted and unbiased news services in US both confirm that it is sealed.

 

The only scenario where both could be correct is my theory on the alternate space-time continuum, any other more logical theory?

 

 

No, it's definitively the alternate space-time continuum theory. A quick google search confirms that the indictment was, and still is, under seal.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, vandeventer said:

Again,

we will just have to wait and see if this judge just throws it all out.

And when he doesn’t you can move to your next layer of denial.

[vandeventer]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And when he doesn’t you can move to your next layer of denial.

If he is a fair judge he will just throw it out as it is 5 years too late to do anything.

[billd766]

4 hours ago, vandeventer said:

It's a face of a great and loyal judge. I hope he takes the right path.

Why would he NOT take the right path?

 

Unlike you, me and every other poster here he will hear ALL the evidence, as will the jury, who will be the people to decide if Trump is guilty of the charges or not.

 

Not you, nor me nor any other poster her, not even the court of public decision on the social media.

 

Unlike you, I have faith in the US courts and the jury/justice system of the USA., plus I will accept the verdict of the jury whatever the result is, guilty or not guilty.

[Chomper Higgot]

4 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

If he is a fair judge he will just throw it out as it is 5 years too late to do anything.

As I predicted, you are building your next level of denial before it’s got to court.

 

Incidentally, what’s 5 years too late, have you seen the indictment(s) and if not how do you know?

[billd766]

4 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Very unlikely - considering this judge found against him previously and the left tv media are already celebrating live in tv this judges appointment

Simply ignore what happened before and concentrate on the here and now.

 

The judge, like all of us can do little to affect the verdict of the jury, who are the people who bring forth the verdict to the judge.

[vandeventer]

34 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

As I predicted, you are building your next level of denial before it’s got to court.

 

Incidentally, what’s 5 years too late, have you seen the indictment(s) and if not how do you know?

I think I heard it on CNN or was it MSNBC I could be mistaken?

[heybruce]

14 hours ago, vandeventer said:

I think I heard it on CNN or was it MSNBC I could be mistaken?

Try reading the news.  That lets you go back and support your claims with referenced quotes.

[pomchop]

19 hours ago, Tug said:

The judge will follow the law that is the path he will follow that’s what judges with integrity do it’s their job

When t again runs his mouth attacking the judge, the DA, the jury, the entire judicial system. and encouraging violence as he is almost surely going to do I expect the judge will issue a gag order as he would with any other loud mouth defendant....and if t continues to defy the court issued gag order he may well get to visit his convict friends for a few days in a jail cell......and if/when that happens cue right wing fox and t magas to scream like a bunch of kids and whine about how unfair it all is and little donnie has done nothing to deserve being treated like any other defendant would be treated.

 

 

[vandeventer]

2 hours ago, heybruce said:

Try reading the news.  That lets you go back and support your claims with referenced quotes.

Your news? No thanks, I would rather read news from other countries than reading or hearing CNN or MSNBC news.

[Chomper Higgot]

7 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Your news? No thanks, I would rather read news from other countries than reading or hearing CNN or MSNBC news.

I’ll think you’ll find the news you clearly aren’t happy hearing is being carried internationally.

 

 

[herfiehandbag]

23 hours ago, placeholder said:

Up to and including those communists on the supreme court.

Please tell me you are taking the Mickey?

 

I mean, if you really think that there are communists on the supreme court you are so divorced from reality that you must be living in a parrallel universe!

[candide]

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

Please tell me you are taking the Mickey?

 

I mean, if you really think that there are communists on the supreme court you are so divorced from reality that you must be living in a parrallel universe!

He was obviously joking.

[FritsSikkink]

On 4/3/2023 at 6:48 AM, vandeventer said:

I am sure Trump will get a fair and honest trial just look at his face?

That is your best argument? What a joke.