Biden denies being present for Hunter’s alleged texts to a Chinese business partner

[placeholder]

48 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Absolutely damning. You and I both know, Comer and patriots in general are not going to let this biden corruption saga go until it has been unravelled. And the coverup is way worse than the influence peddling, money laundering etc. It is this sort of dishonesty that can result in whole agencies being disbanded and started afresh.

EVERYONE must be held equal under one law. Santos, Trump, Omar, Biden. EVERYONE. No more censorship to coverup crimes when it's the left doing them, time for transprency and honesty.

Another right wing mind reader telling others what they know. Stick to what you know or rather what you believe you know.

[placeholder]

17 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

For a dude with many failed businesses he still rides around in a pretty sweet PRIVATE JET....

He got lucky with The Apprentice. That was based on the false belief that he was a highly successful business person and a great negotiator even though he absolutely destroyed his father's highly successful real estate business and got outnegotiated in several ventures for which he paid way too much and which subsequently went bankrupt. New York banks refused to lend to him. At the time the show began Trump actually had a massive negative net worth. His genius, such as it is, is as a con man and he conned people into believing that he was highly successful. Hence such nasty disasters as Trump University.

[Fat is a type of crazy]

32 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Of course. In the US of A this is obviously not happening. It's ridiculous that Donald was impeached and Joe hasn't been.

You might think the left media is in a big conspiracy to save Biden but I bet if there was evidence of wrongdoing papers like the Washington Post and New York Times would love to get the scoop and expose any president left or right. 

Maybe hold off with the conclusions to wait if there is ever something substantial against Biden himself which so far there is not. 

[Neeranam]

10 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

You might think the left media is in a big conspiracy to save Biden but I bet if there was evidence of wrongdoing papers like the Washington Post and New York Times would love to get the scoop and expose any president left or right. 

Maybe hold off with the conclusions to wait if there is ever something substantial against Biden himself which so far there is not. 

Fair enough, but from what I have read, there is evidence that the DOJ are on Biden's side, even committing a crime. 

[Hanaguma]

13 minutes ago, placeholder said:

He got lucky with The Apprentice. That was based on the false belief that he was a highly successful business person and a great negotiator even though he absolutely destroyed his father's highly successful real estate business and got outnegotiated in several ventures for which he paid way too much and which subsequently went bankrupt. New York banks refused to lend to him. At the time the show began Trump actually had a massive negative net worth. His genius, such as it is, is as a con man and he conned people into believing that he was highly successful. Hence such nasty disasters as Trump University.

757

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

757

I'm guessing you think that the model of his plane is somehow a refutation of the facts I've offered?

[candide]

52 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Of course. In the US of A this is obviously not happening. It's ridiculous that Donald was impeached and Joe hasn't been.

What? Biden tried to overturn elections, incited to storm the Capitol, and made a perfect call asking to find him 11,000 votes, and nobody told me?

Ah! these damned MSM never talked about it! ????

[Hanaguma]

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I'm guessing you think that the model of his plane is somehow a refutation of the facts I've offered?

Actually, yes. Unless you know many other losers and broke businessmen who own one. 

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Actually, yes. Unless you know many other losers and broke businessmen who own one. 

Trump's revival came not from his skills a a business person but his talents as a performer on a TV show. Or by your way of thinking are movie and TV stars great business people because of their wealth?

[onthedarkside]

A misquoted reply taken out of context has been removed along with replies

[Hanaguma]

Just now, placeholder said:

Trump's revival came not from his skills a a business person but his talents as a performer on a TV show. Or by your way of thinking are movie and TV stars great business people because of their wealth?

Does it really matter by this point? But I will answer you.  I think it is a combination. Trump had an image based on his business acumen and also his spectacular failures.  He was a brash New York BS artist with an easily recognizable name and image. Also a man with considerable personal charisma and a flair for showmanship. Both contributed to his success on TV as well as in branding himself.

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Does it really matter by this point? But I will answer you.  I think it is a combination. Trump had an image based on his business acumen and also his spectacular failures.  He was a brash New York BS artist with an easily recognizable name and image. Also a man with considerable personal charisma and a flair for showmanship. Both contributed to his success on TV as well as in branding himself.

I don't think his image was based on his spectacular failures. His constituency believed, and still believes, that he is a great negotiator, despite his abysmal record. And that his negotiating skills would make him effective as a President.

[heybruce]

1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

Does it really matter by this point? But I will answer you.  I think it is a combination. Trump had an image based on his business acumen and also his spectacular failures.  He was a brash New York BS artist with an easily recognizable name and image. Also a man with considerable personal charisma and a flair for showmanship. Both contributed to his success on TV as well as in branding himself.

None of the above qualities qualify to be President, as he demonstrated while in office.  You know, sharing foreign intelligence with the Russians, attempting to strong arm foreign leaders, failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, failure to build the wall and get Russia to pay for it, failure to pass an infrastructure bill even though it was "infrastructure week" for a large portion of his Presidency...

 

I'd rather have a qualified, experienced, boring President than a clueless showman.

[Hanaguma]

11 minutes ago, heybruce said:

None of the above qualities qualify to be President, as he demonstrated while in office.  You know, sharing foreign intelligence with the Russians, attempting to strong arm foreign leaders, failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, failure to build the wall and get Russia to pay for it, failure to pass an infrastructure bill even though it was "infrastructure week" for a large portion of his Presidency...

 

I'd rather have a qualified, experienced, boring President than a clueless showman.

So would I, but we didnt get that either IMHO.  Except for the boring part.

Actually, that's not true. Joe is anything but boring lately. There are almost daily oopsies and brainfarts and malapropisms to enjoy. 

[candide]

5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Absolutely damning. You and I both know, Comer and patriots in general are not going to let this biden corruption saga go until it has been unravelled. And the coverup is way worse than the influence peddling, money laundering etc. It is this sort of dishonesty that can result in whole agencies being disbanded and started afresh.

EVERYONE must be held equal under one law. Santos, Trump, Omar, Biden. EVERYONE. No more censorship to coverup crimes when it's the left doing them, time for transprency and honesty.

"EVERYONE must be held equal under one law". We can at least agree on that. There's no reason why Trump should be exempted because he is a former president and also a presidential candidate. The law applies to anyone, including him!

[placeholder]

4 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Fair enough, but from what I have read, there is evidence that the DOJ are on Biden's side, even committing a crime. 

I believe you given that you can find pretty much anything on the internet that supports your beliefs. Believe it or not, there are some web sites so deranged that they actually claim the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

[scottiejohn]

4 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Fair enough, but from what I have read, there is evidence that the DOJ are on Biden's side, even committing a crime. 

And that substantiated evidence is where and regarding what crime?

[Neeranam]

42 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

And that substantiated evidence is where and regarding what crime?

Here's one of many reports. Sadly, not many in the US, as there is a huge coverup there.

 

Quote

An IRS agent who oversaw a criminal investigation into Hunter Biden has testified to a House committee that the Justice Department slow-walked the case and gave Biden preferential treatment because he is President Joe Biden’s son.

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politifact/2023/06/28/hunter-bidens-criminal-case-what-irs-whistleblowers-said-about-joe-biden-doj/

[scottiejohn]

Just now, Neeranam said:

Here's one of many reports. Sadly, not many in the US, as there is a huge coverup there.

 

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politifact/2023/06/28/hunter-bidens-criminal-case-what-irs-whistleblowers-said-about-joe-biden-doj/

The above does not answer my question (as usual from you on most subjects)!

 

I asked for "And that substantiated evidence is where and regarding what crime?"

 

Please state the actual alleged crime with a link to the substantiated evidence.

 

[placeholder]

31 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Here's one of many reports. Sadly, not many in the US, as there is a huge coverup there.

 

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politifact/2023/06/28/hunter-bidens-criminal-case-what-irs-whistleblowers-said-about-joe-biden-doj/

Really? Not many? Here's coverage from the unholy three:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/22/us/politics/hunter-biden-joe-business-deal.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/22/hunter-biden-whistleblower-transcript-garland/

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/16/politics/irs-whistleblower-congress/index.html

 

[scottiejohn]

12 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Really? Not many? Here's coverage from the unholy three:

Sorry but the articles you quote are all behind paywalls(to me).

Do any of them have an actual alleged crime with a link to any substantiated evidence?

[LosLobo]

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

Here's one of many reports. Sadly, not many in the US, as there is a huge coverup there.

 

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politifact/2023/06/28/hunter-bidens-criminal-case-what-irs-whistleblowers-said-about-joe-biden-doj/

You obviously didn't read your article, where it says :

 

'Legal experts cautioned against assuming the whistleblowers are fully correct. A full understanding of the government’s handling of the case can emerge only with a wide examination of evidence, such as emails, texts and testimony from other participants who may have seen the same events from a different perspective'.

[BenStark]

On 6/29/2023 at 7:14 AM, Social Media said:

President Biden is denying he was present when his son Hunter allegedly texted a Chinese

I'm sure he wouldn't even remember wherever he was on that day.

[scottiejohn]

43 minutes ago, BenStark said:

I'm sure he wouldn't even remember wherever he was on that day.

If it never happened how can anybody remember it?

[billd766]

51 minutes ago, BenStark said:

I'm sure he wouldn't even remember wherever he was on that day.

Can you remember where you were on every single day 6 years ago?

[billd766]

2 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Can you remember where you were on every single day 6 years ago?

I remember where I was in 1963 when Kennedy was assassinated because I was in the RAF in Bahrain and I have a record.

 

When I left the RAF and I was working for Motorola from 1988 until 1999 I know which countries I was in during which year, but where I was in any particular country on any particular day I have no idea.

 

I threw all those records away years ago.

[nauseus]

6 hours ago, heybruce said:

None of the above qualities qualify to be President, as he demonstrated while in office.  You know, sharing foreign intelligence with the Russians, attempting to strong arm foreign leaders, failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, failure to build the wall and get Russia to pay for it, failure to pass an infrastructure bill even though it was "infrastructure week" for a large portion of his Presidency...

 

I'd rather have a qualified, experienced, boring President than a clueless showman.

Experienced?

[nauseus]

5 hours ago, LosLobo said:

 

'The most bizarre twist and absolutely damning'.

 

I wonder if Jim Jordan Chairman of House Judicial Committee can deny being present.

 

Seems Jim Jordan really has a whistle-blower and it is all about his alleged misconduct at Ohio University.

 

'Scotus ruled last Monday afternoon that a lawsuit against Ohio State University where Jim Jordan was an assistant wrestling coach can move forward'.

 

Witness testimony alleges cover-up leaving Jim Jordan in flames as the Ohio State University scandal continues (msn.com)

 

Your link is worse than flash photography and should have a warning sign.

[Isaan sailor]

Let’s see where these allegations and investigations go.  One thing everyone can agree on—the Hunter Biden laptop is the real thing.  Of course, it took a year or more for some media to acknowledge it.

[BenStark]

3 minutes ago, Isaan sailor said:

Let’s see where these allegations and investigations go.  One thing everyone can agree on—the Hunter Biden laptop is the real thing.  Of course, it took a year or more for some media to acknowledge it.

The Joe dementia is also a real thing