Jump to content

Thai democracy at risk following Pheu Thai’s exclusion of MFP in coalition


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, webfact said:

The declaration, largely participated in by several pro-democracy groups, insinuated this move against MFP would backfire on the Pheu Thai Party.

were it political parties that were upset i would say that it might have an effect. other than that i dont think so, the writing was on the wall and most people expected the tide to shift this way anyways. for me comes as no surprise

Posted
14 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

What Thai democracy? Thai democracy is not the same as western democracy Mr Prayuth said himself.. Democracy in Thailand is a totalitair system almost dictatorial.. surely no democracy

Yes, there isn't a great deal at stake here. Democracy is an over rated word anyway, most people will go their whole lives without being confronted by constitutional matters or having to speak with their MP. As for 'Western democracy' if we take the UK as an example, there is no proportional representation in government, just winner takes all and an unelected House of Lords and a huge disparity in the distribution of wealth. More important than parliament is an Independent judiciary (providing you can afford a lawyer) and a free press but the media is owned by the elite. The majority of people get by just fine under a benign dictatorship or a pseudo democracy like Thailand, a little excitement only happens at election time but soon calms down and life goes on in its own chaotic way.

  • Sad 1
Posted

I am SO SO tired of hearing the BS about "Democracy is at risk". When there is a coup, that's true, when you're voting and upholding a constitution, it's not. Even if you don't like the constitution.  Democracy takes time to work correctly. YOU don't get what you want unless all the rules are followed.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Worth a read. Would the authorities really dissolve MF with more serious legal ramifications than that of FF's dissolution?

And would the manure really hit the fan then ?

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

I am SO SO tired of hearing the BS about "Democracy is at risk". When there is a coup, that's true, when you're voting and upholding a constitution, it's not. Even if you don't like the constitution.  Democracy takes time to work correctly. YOU don't get what you want unless all the rules are followed.

The rules are NEVER followed after a military coup.

 

The generals simply write new rules to suit themselves.

  • Like 2
Posted

Pheu Thai deputy party leader Phumtham Wechayachai has urged all those concerned to work together in the attempt to form a government, in order that pressing problems can be addressed and resolved “so the country and the people will survive.”

 

After breaking from the eight-party coalition, led by the Move Forward party, Pheu Thai has been lobbying senators and MPs hard for support of Srettha Thavisin, the party’s prime ministerial candidate. They are also asking several parties in the current government to join its coalition, before the haggling starts over cabinet portfolios.

 

https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pheu-thai-party-seeks-cooperation-to-solve-current-political-impasse/

main-2023-08-05T160047.138.png

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, anchadian said:

Pheu Thai deputy party leader Phumtham Wechayachai has urged all those concerned to work together in the attempt to form a government, in order that pressing problems can be addressed and resolved “so the country and the people will survive.”

 

After breaking from the eight-party coalition, led by the Move Forward party, Pheu Thai has been lobbying senators and MPs hard for support of Srettha Thavisin, the party’s prime ministerial candidate. They are also asking several parties in the current government to join its coalition, before the haggling starts over cabinet portfolios.

 

https://www.thaipbsworld.com/pheu-thai-party-seeks-cooperation-to-solve-current-political-impasse/

main-2023-08-05T160047.138.png

It will be very interesting to see the senators response to Srettha Thavisin, the party’s prime ministerial candidate.

 

IMHO they will either have to accept it and choke on it, or reject it.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/5/2023 at 12:25 AM, soalbundy said:

Yes, there isn't a great deal at stake here. Democracy is an over rated word anyway, most people will go their whole lives without being confronted by constitutional matters or having to speak with their MP. As for 'Western democracy' if we take the UK as an example, there is no proportional representation in government, just winner takes all and an unelected House of Lords and a huge disparity in the distribution of wealth. More important than parliament is an Independent judiciary (providing you can afford a lawyer) and a free press but the media is owned by the elite. The majority of people get by just fine under a benign dictatorship or a pseudo democracy like Thailand, a little excitement only happens at election time but soon calms down and life goes on in its own chaotic way.

Totally agree. The UK, like other western 'democracies', is becoming more authoritarian by the day. Witness the debanking scandal (which is much wider than Nigel Farage by the way), where faceless bank bureaucrats can make someone a non-person just because they don't like their opinions, or the censorship of any views which contradict the official narrative on Covid 1984, climate change, Ukraine etc etc.

 

A benign dictatorship like Singapore, where the people give up marginal freedoms in exchange for prosperity, no corruption and a well-managed economy is preferable to a pseudo democracy like Thailand, where corruption is rampant and most of the country's wealth is controlled by an all-powerful elite.

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, roquefort said:

Totally agree. The UK, like other western 'democracies', is becoming more authoritarian by the day. Witness the debanking scandal (which is much wider than Nigel Farage by the way), where faceless bank bureaucrats can make someone a non-person just because they don't like their opinions, or the censorship of any views which contradict the official narrative on Covid 1984, climate change, Ukraine etc etc.

 

A benign dictatorship like Singapore, where the people give up marginal freedoms in exchange for prosperity, no corruption and a well-managed economy is preferable to a pseudo democracy like Thailand, where corruption is rampant and most of the country's wealth is controlled by an all-powerful elite.

Could you please develop on the "marginal freedoms" Singaporean gave up? I am interested in reading this.

 

And about western democracy, are we talking about electing people, who then after conduct policies we had never asked for?? Except for the form, what difference does it make with other non-democratic countries?? I just recall 2005, as the French voted against the EU constitution project; 3 years later, French President Sarkozy signed the Lisbon Treaty and allowed France to rejoin the NATO integrated command.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Rachel de France said:

Could you please develop on the "marginal freedoms" Singaporean gave up? I am interested in reading this.

 

And about western democracy, are we talking about electing people, who then after conduct policies we had never asked for?? Except for the form, what difference does it make with other non-democratic countries?? I just recall 2005, as the French voted against the EU constitution project; 3 years later, French President Sarkozy signed the Lisbon Treaty and allowed France to rejoin the NATO integrated command.

That's exactly what we're talking about and why western democracy is a sham. We're allowed a meaningless vote every 4 or 5 years to lull us into thinking we have some choice over how the country is run. The technocracy then completely ignores our wishes and carries on with its own agenda, regardless of the people's vote. Did anyone vote for Net Zero or half a million net immigration every year?

 

Re Singapore,  an example of marginal freedoms is freedom of the press. This used to exist in the UK, even though the mainstream media (including the BBC) was largely controlled by a small elite, all shades of opinion were tolerated and editorial freedom was sacrosanct. Now alternative views are suppressed by both MSM and social media platforms under the guise of 'disinformation'. Singapore has never made any secret of what can be published and what can't, there is a red line and everyone understands where it is and accepts it as a trade-off for the other benefits the government provides - prosperity, security and institutions that work,

  • Like 1
Posted

"Something" would have had to exist for it to be at "risk".

 

'Democracy' has only existed here for brief periods, since ~ 2006 (they tried to get rid of Thaksin in 2001) it's been a junta "ruling" Thailand.

 

Another Constitutional Crisis has arisen, all because a few minor changes to a law which protects a handful of individuals is a bridge too far.

 

It would simpler if they just went back to an absolute monarchy.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...