Tucker Carlson asks Trump: Are you worried ‘they’re going to try and kill you?’

[Tropposurfer]

Two truly pathologically, deeply mentally ill, and sociologically dangerous people.

[novacova]

2 hours ago, TigerandDog said:

and therein lies the stupidity of the US electoral system.

and therein lies the ignorance of the US electoral system

[novacova]

1 hour ago, jtrump said:

Oh and don't forget the latest that Tucker revealed.  He interviewed the head of security for the capital and he said he asked for permission to activate the National Guard and it took 2 hours to get a response of YES.  Why 2 hours, did Nancy want the riots to happen? Was she in on it?  These are the questions intelligent Americans are asking.  Nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

Oh please! Let the ignorant continue in their perpetual state of ignorance where they feel most comfortable. They lack any ability of empirical thought and are only capable of receiving thinking orders from the media. There’s nicer things to do then going in circles with the Anti-Trump woke zombie zealots. But don’t forget to point out their prejudices

[bignok]

Indian dude should be pres

[Bkk Brian]

1 minute ago, novacova said:

Oh please! Let the ignorant continue in their perpetual state of ignorance where they feel most comfortable. They lack any ability of empirical thought and are only capable of receiving thinking orders from the media. There’s nicer things to do then going in circles with the Anti-Trump woke zombie zealots. But don’t forget to point out their prejudices

Have you sent your legal funds to Trump yet?

[ozimoron]

1 hour ago, jtrump said:

You mean conspiracy theories like the Hunter Biden laptop being Russian Collusion or maybe the so-called vaccines don't prevent you from catching Covid?  Tucker has over 2M followers but but you think he is trying to stay relevant, hahaha.

No, he's lying because he always lies. How many regular viewers did he have on Fox? 2 million is very much struggling to stay relevant.

[ozimoron]

6 minutes ago, bignok said:

Indian dude should be pres

As if the party of racism is going to elect an Indian? Or a black guy? Or a woman? Or a Latino? Trump will win the nomination by default.

[candide]

12 minutes ago, novacova said:

Oh please! Let the ignorant continue in their perpetual state of ignorance where they feel most comfortable. They lack any ability of empirical thought and are only capable of receiving thinking orders from the media. There’s nicer things to do then going in circles with the Anti-Trump woke zombie zealots. But don’t forget to point out their prejudices

Projecting much?

[Baht Simpson]

7 hours ago, 300sd said:

Trump will never be allowed to win the next election, if there is one!

Yes, the electorate will ensure that. ???? 

[Walker88]

2 hours ago, jtrump said:

You mean conspiracy theories like the Hunter Biden laptop being Russian Collusion or maybe the so-called vaccines don't prevent you from catching Covid?  Tucker has over 2M followers but but you think he is trying to stay relevant, hahaha.

There was collusion with russia. Having an AG who prohibits real investigation, whitewashes the report, and then a Senate with an (R) majority who would never convict one of their own, does not equate to innocent.

 

manafort, as campaign manager gave internal polling data to konstantin kilimnik, who gave it to the GRU's Internet Research Agency (ironically run by now possibly dead prigozhin), who then microtargeted voters in swing States with fake stories on HRC.

 

roger stone was in constant contact with Wikileaks and knew the dates and material Wikileaks would leak. trump even noted that in one of his rallies.

 

THAT is collusion, or better said, willing cooperation.

 

Oh, and this was in the majority (R) SSCI Report.

 

Perhaps you missed the article on all the graft trump family members and trump got while he was serving and his daughter and SIL were ostensibly serving as public officials. It makes anything Hunter might have done look like stealing a cookie from Grandma's jar.

[Walker88]

"they"  LOL.

 

tucky is such a little putz.  Start a conspiracy and see if the goobers buy into it. Of course they're dumb enough to believe it.

 

91 felony charges, with plenty of (R) witnesses suggest trump dies in jail.

 

Curious when he turns himself into authorities in Georgia, he might get a surprise and be refused bail, as his statements show he fully intends to intimidate witnesses and public officials doing their job. His dog whistle BS is so transparent. Just like 6 January, the coward gets others to do his wet work.

 

I suspect more likely he will be instructed to keep his flap shut, lest his bail be revoked and he gets jailed pending trial. I bet he would no longer insist on a 2026 trial date if jailed now.

 

Lock him up. (That's not my quote; I borrowed it from 'someone')

Edited August 24, 2023 by Walker88

[OneMoreFarang]

One serial liar interviewing another serial liar.

What do people expect from such conversation?

 

[expat_4_life]

I don't think they want to kill him, but there is this - you decide ????

 

Edited August 24, 2023 by expat_4_life

[GarryP]

4 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

Who is "they"?

 

Is this some sort of prison prediction? 

 

Stay out of the shower, or join the Aryan gang.

 

 

Don't think he'd appeal to anyone, or at least anyone who sees him remove his Depends before entering the shower. 

[DJ54]

IMO both front runners for US Prez PTUS should retire and let some younger newer ideas .. One because age and the other Age and McDonalds doesn’t deliver to inmates….

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, jtrump said:

Oh and don't forget the latest that Tucker revealed.  He interviewed the head of security for the capital and he said he asked for permission to activate the National Guard and it took 2 hours to get a response of YES.  Why 2 hours, did Nancy want the riots to happen? Was she in on it?  These are the questions intelligent Americans are asking.  Nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

You are misinformed.

 

Only Trump and the SecDef had authority to call in the National Guard. 

 

 

[candide]

41 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You are misinformed.

 

Only Trump and the SecDef had authority to call in the National Guard. 

 

 

On top of it, Nancy was not in charge of security at the capitol. That's just another lie by Trump for his stupid fans.

[BusyB]

As usual, half the story (and I have no idea who or what 'The Hill' is.

 

Tucker asked Trump if he was concerned ''the left'' may decide to kill him, having already impeached him twice etc.

 

Trump's answer was that they, ''the left'' are sick and savage. Although he was careful enough to say some Dems are OK. 

[mushroomdave]

[Danderman123]

5 hours ago, jtrump said:

Oh and don't forget the latest that Tucker revealed.  He interviewed the head of security for the capital and he said he asked for permission to activate the National Guard and it took 2 hours to get a response of YES.  Why 2 hours, did Nancy want the riots to happen? Was she in on it?  These are the questions intelligent Americans are asking.  Nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3787032-dc-national-guard-deployment-wasnt-purposefully-delayed-on-jan-6-final-report-finds/

 

"President Trump had authority and responsibility to direct deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia, but never gave any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other day,” the committee wrote in the 845-page report it released Thursday evening. “Nor did he instruct any Federal law enforcement agency to assist."

[Danderman123]

5 hours ago, jtrump said:

Oh and don't forget the latest that Tucker revealed.  He interviewed the head of security for the capital and he said he asked for permission to activate the National Guard and it took 2 hours to get a response of YES.  Why 2 hours, did Nancy want the riots to happen? Was she in on it?  These are the questions intelligent Americans are asking.  Nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/21/politics/fact-check-jim-jordan-nancy-pelosi-january-6-security/index.html

 

"The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance."

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

You are misinformed.

 

Only Trump and the SecDef had authority to call in the National Guard. 

 

 

or the Capitol Police Board, apparently.

[placeholder]

5 hours ago, novacova said:

Oh please! Let the ignorant continue in their perpetual state of ignorance where they feel most comfortable. They lack any ability of empirical thought and are only capable of receiving thinking orders from the media. There’s nicer things to do then going in circles with the Anti-Trump woke zombie zealots. But don’t forget to point out their prejudices

Speaking of the ignorant...I guess you don't understand that Trump was the Commander-in-Chief and had the authority to call in the National Guard under these circumstances. Trump refused to take phone calls imploring him to do that.  He refused to listen to Republicans in the White House asking for the same thing. Instead, he was glued to his TV set to watch the insurrection. Afterwards he lied about watching it on TV. Instead, he claimed he was in meetings. But members of the administration in the White House, his people, reported that he was watching it on TV.

[placeholder]

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The left "don't threaten judges". ??

 

Short memory or what.

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/5/21165479/chuck-schumer-neil-gorsuch-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-whirlwind-threat

 

But they do apologize:

On Thursday, Schumer walked back his original remarks somewhat in a statement on the Senate floor. “I should not have used the words I used yesterday,” he said, adding that, “they did not come out the way I intended to.”

He says that his intention was to convey that “there would be political consequences—political consequences, for President Trump and Senate Republicans—if the Supreme Court, with newly confirmed Justices, stripped away a woman’s right to choose.”

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/5/21165479/chuck-schumer-neil-gorsuch-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-whirlwind-threat

 

I'm sure an industrious researcher such as yourself can come up with plenty of examples of Trump apologizing for his many similar statements. How about just one?

[Walker88]

8 hours ago, jtrump said:

Oh and don't forget the latest that Tucker revealed.  He interviewed the head of security for the capital and he said he asked for permission to activate the National Guard and it took 2 hours to get a response of YES.  Why 2 hours, did Nancy want the riots to happen? Was she in on it?  These are the questions intelligent Americans are asking.  Nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

Look, maybe that's the word in your trailer park, but the reality is different.

 

POTUS, only, had the authority to call out the National Guard, not Speaker of the House.

 

trump sat on his fat a$$ for 180 minutes while his goobers beat Capitol Police and went after the VP to hang him.  trump did NOTHING.

 

It really gets old teaching your goobers the truth.

[rudi49jr]

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

But they do apologize:

On Thursday, Schumer walked back his original remarks somewhat in a statement on the Senate floor. “I should not have used the words I used yesterday,” he said, adding that, “they did not come out the way I intended to.”

He says that his intention was to convey that “there would be political consequences—political consequences, for President Trump and Senate Republicans—if the Supreme Court, with newly confirmed Justices, stripped away a woman’s right to choose.”

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/5/21165479/chuck-schumer-neil-gorsuch-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-whirlwind-threat

 

I'm sure an industrious researcher such as yourself can come up with plenty of examples of Trump apologizing for his many similar statements. How about just one?

People like Trump never apologize, or admit they were wrong, because they see it as a sign of weakness. Instead, they double down to protect their giant but oh so fragile ego. 

[Skipalongcassidy]

16 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

This question came up cuz that's where their heads are at. Their opposition (aka normal thinking humans) don't plan insurrections, don't contemplate killing police officers, don't threaten judges and juries because they don't like the decisions made, don't attempt to overthrow the government, and on and on. THAT'S the basic difference between the two parties.

You mean like Antifa and BLM being just "normal thinking humans"... get real

[Skipalongcassidy]

9 hours ago, placeholder said:

But they do apologize:

On Thursday, Schumer walked back his original remarks somewhat in a statement on the Senate floor. “I should not have used the words I used yesterday,” he said, adding that, “they did not come out the way I intended to.”

He says that his intention was to convey that “there would be political consequences—political consequences, for President Trump and Senate Republicans—if the Supreme Court, with newly confirmed Justices, stripped away a woman’s right to choose.”

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/5/21165479/chuck-schumer-neil-gorsuch-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-whirlwind-threat

 

I'm sure an industrious researcher such as yourself can come up with plenty of examples of Trump apologizing for his many similar statements. How about just one?

You are right... when dems get caught out they immediately go into the "I'm sorry mode"... I'm sorry that I got caught out that is.

[Skeptic7]

Would be a glorious dream come true. 

[heybruce]

19 minutes ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

You are right... when dems get caught out they immediately go into the "I'm sorry mode"... I'm sorry that I got caught out that is.

Isn't that better than insisting that everything they say is true (even when it isn't) and everything they do is perfect?