RIP KWASAKI
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
127
Trump ostracized at pope’s funeral
C'mon, you gotta do better than that. Prove the images available have been photoshopped. Even if video footage was available, MAGA Avengers would only claim AI. There are multiple images available online where Trump has fallen asleep at official functions, Have they all been Photoshopped ? If it was an image of someone who wasn't part of the MAGA cult, you wouldn't even try and deflect. But because its Trump, you have to fall back on conspiracy theories. Hint, try typing into Google: "Did trump fall asleep at the funeral". -
87
BREAKING NEWS Virginia Giuffre, Fierce Advocate and Epstein Survivor, Dies by Suicide at 41
Of course he will. No sweat. -
87
BREAKING NEWS Virginia Giuffre, Fierce Advocate and Epstein Survivor, Dies by Suicide at 41
The opinion you @Cameroniprovided contains several problematic elements, both factually and ethically, that warrant a reply: You use derogatory terms like "whore" and reduces Virginia Giuffre to an object devoid of agency or complexity. This dehumanizing language dismisses the nuances of her situation and perpetuates victim-blaming. It ignores the power dynamics inherent in relationships involving minors and influential adults, especially in cases of alleged trafficking or exploitation. Giuffre was 17 when she met Epstein, a minor under U.S. law, which complicates the narrative of "willing participation." You assert Giuffre "chose" to engage with Epstein repeatedly, framing her actions as purely transactional and voluntary. This ignores the potential for grooming, manipulation, or coercion, which are well-documented tactics used by individuals like Epstein to exploit vulnerable people. Minors cannot legally consent to sexual activities in many jurisdictions, and psychological or financial pressures can undermine perceived "free will." The claim that Giuffre "made up lies" to extort millions is speculative and not fully supported by evidence. Giuffre’s allegations against Epstein and others were part of legal proceedings that resulted in settlements, not convictions for perjury or fraud. For example, her settlement with Prince Andrew (reportedly around $16 million) was a civil agreement, not proof of falsehood. The opinion also misrepresents the Dershowitz case: Giuffre’s acknowledgment of possible "misremembering" was part of a mutual settlement, not a legal finding of perjury. The assertion that Giuffre was a "professional blackmailer" lacks substantiation beyond the opinion’s narrative. Legal settlements in high-profile cases often involve complex motivations, including avoiding protracted litigation, and do not inherently prove deceit. Misogynistic Undertones: Your fixation on Giuffre’s alleged greed and sexual behavior, while framing her as manipulative, reflects misogynistic tropes that disproportionately vilify women in sexual abuse cases. It suggests that her pursuit of financial compensation undermines her credibility, ignoring that civil lawsuits are a common recourse for survivors seeking justice. Misapplication of "Karma" and Moral Judgment: The invocation of "karmic law" and the claim that Giuffre was "ruined" introduces a moralizing tone that lacks grounding in evidence. There’s no clear indication that Giuffre faced legal or personal ruin; this appears to be wishful speculation. Such rhetoric shifts focus from factual analysis to personal vendetta. Selective Use of Legal Outcomes: You highlight Giuffre’s settlement with Dershowitz as evidence of her dishonesty but ignores the broader context of Epstein’s crimes. Epstein’s 2008 plea deal and subsequent 2019 charges for sex trafficking corroborate a pattern of predatory behavior, lending credence to some of Giuffre’s claims. Dismissing her entire narrative as "fantasy" overlooks these established facts. You fail to grapple with the power imbalance between a wealthy, connected figure like Epstein and a young, economically disadvantaged individual like Giuffre. Even if she returned to Epstein, this does not negate the possibility of exploitation, as victims of trafficking or abuse often face barriers to leaving, including fear, financial dependency, or lack of support. -
-
0
Trump says US ships need free travel through the Panama and Suez Canals
President Donald Trump called for “free of charge” passage of American ships through the Panama and Suez canals, renewing his focus of expanding US influence over critical commercial and naval waterways. Trump’s focus has been on Chinese commercial shipping and shipbuilding, with the ultimate goal of promoting a revival of US shipbuilding, as the US government argues that China’s dominance in ship construction was achieved unfairly and harms US interests. US commercial shipbuilding, once a global leader, has shrivelled since the 1980s due to subsidy cuts and foreign competition. Trump says US ships need free travel through Panama, Suez Canals- 1
-
-
133
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now