Just now, MrMojoRisin said:

I have never used the ignore button or report button.

Never.

Not once.

Years and years debating with pro Thai junta numpties and I’ve never even been tempted to ignore someone.

 

Guess what?

Bye troll, don't worry I'll still be responding to your nonsense

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

The words from a Hamas apologist 

 

There are no Hamas apologists on AN.

 

There's nothing wrong to call out ethnic cleansing and other crimes against humanity for non combatant Palestinians and non combatant hostages...

18 minutes ago, MrMojoRisin said:

Cookies and flowers, everything else is an antisemitic lie.

 

Zero babies from either side is the only number that would make me happy. I can answer this question quite easily as many times as you ask it.

So, an even more resounding no when asked to support your claim that: "If there was no oppression, land theft and subjugation of Palestinians by Israelis there would not have been an attack by Hamas.". 

 

You are not able to support that claim, so you (as usual) have just posted more nonsense. 

 

Indeed, a one-trick-pony, repeating the same unsupported lies over and over. 

 

You claim one dead baby it too many, but apparently thousands of dead Jewish babies are not enough for you. 

Just now, MrMojoRisin said:

I have never used the ignore button or report button.

Never.

Not once.

Years and years debating with pro Thai junta numpties and I’ve never even been tempted to ignore someone.

 

Guess what?

You've only been here 2 years, more porkies from the orange brigade.....

1 minute ago, Neeranam said:

What is the death count now? 

Ask your buddies hamas

6 minutes ago, Lemsta69 said:

 

Clearly not, otherwise they would have banned the Q'u**n years ago.

 

Also the UK is not at war, Israel is, so I don't know why you keep mentioning the place.

Is it so hard for you to read that article and say the Rabbi was wrong?

 

I think his article is indefensible.

Just now, Thorgal said:

 

There are no Hamas apologists on AN.

 

There's nothing wrong to call out ethnic cleansing and other crimes against humanity for non combatant Palestinians and non combatant hostages...

Get back to me when you have something worthwhile to add, I've already posted plenty of proof of his apologist posts

3 minutes ago, Thorgal said:

 

+1.500 children (-16 Y) are still missing and are under the demolitions/buildings.

Israel will kill another couple of thousand women and some here will say 'at least they game them internet'.

Why are they ignoring the fact that 3,000 kids have been killed?

1 minute ago, Neeranam said:

What is the death count now? 

Oh, no..........🤨

Do the terrorist supporters here have to do everything for you..?  🤔 

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

You claim one dead baby it too many, but apparently thousands of dead Jewish babies are not enough for you. 

How have you arrived at that conclusion?

3 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

"There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel," will be allowed to head to Gaza, ordered Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on Monday, October 9. 
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/video/2023/10/09/israel-hamas-war-what-happened-on-day-three-of-the-conflict_6159796_4.html

 

“Let me be clear: The use of starvation as a weapon of war is a war crime.”

These are the words of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon

(2016)

 

I think Israel has to be very careful not to sink to a level of moral abandonment and in so doing commit war crimes.

The UN should immediately put this criminal, Yoav Gallant in jail, disgusting. 

Just now, MrMojoRisin said:

How have you arrived at that conclusion?

LOL, I can't wait to hear this answer!

1 minute ago, JBChiangRai said:

Is it so hard for you to read that article and say the Rabbi was wrong?

 

I think his article is indefensible.

 

I read the article and saw nothing wrong with it. It's exactly what I'd expect from that type of person. I did read some of the Bible when I was a kid.

2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Israel will kill another couple of thousand women and some here will say 'at least they game them internet'.

Why are they ignoring the fact that 3,000 kids have been killed?

 

You have to go back to the latest speech of Netanyahu where he revealed the Biblical term : "AMALEK".

16 minutes ago, Paul Catton said:

My math wasn't wrong, 246 were were Army personnel and Police, legitimate targets, erred by 16, prior to the subsequent fanaticism creating the atrocity. 

One could argue servicemen are legitimate targets of war, but police? 

 

Oh, and when did Palestine declare war on Irael, I missed that. 

2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

LOL, I can't wait to hear this answer!

 

#metoo

1 hour ago, Lemsta69 said:

 

Interesting. I wonder how he thinks Israel can carpet bomb the place if they don't have any bombers? 😂

 

At least that's what Wikipedia says...

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Air_Force

Oh, yes they have.

2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

 

Based on UNESCO figures (29/10/2023)? Really?

 

Its from the official account of your Russian buddies Rybar Force

 

Well euh, they're not under pressure of the Hasbara Fellowship...please report as usual Brian... you start to be predictable...

Just now, Thorgal said:

 

Well euh, they're not under pressure of the Hasbara Fellowship...please report as usual Brian... you start to be predictable...

Nah why report, rather leave it there to show where you hang out troll

13 minutes ago, Thorgal said:

 

+1.500 children (-16 Y) are still missing and are under the demolitions/buildings.

I thought you said a million, no? 

 

Does anyone think this is a fair response?

GAZA: 3,195 CHILDREN KILLED IN THREE WEEKS

https://www.savethechildren.net/news/gaza-3195-children-killed-three-weeks-surpasses-annual-number-children-killed-conflict-zones

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

GAZA: 3,195 CHILDREN KILLED IN THREE WEEKS

https://www.savethechildren.net/news/gaza-3195-children-killed-three-weeks-surpasses-annual-number-children-killed-conflict-zones

You'd think Hamas would have released all the hostages and tried to put a stop to it eh

13 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

Is it so hard for you to read that article and say the Rabbi was wrong?

 

I think his article is indefensible.

What did he say?

 

Why do you not pull out and post the parts you think are indefensible? 

 

Don't be so intellectually lazy.  

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I thought you said a million, no? 

 

 

I've responded to your question about Palestinian civilians as non combatants that are still alive...

 

Your fallacy of misinterpretation doesn't work...and you've tried the same malicious trick with other posters in vain...

1 hour ago, Lemsta69 said:

 

I read the article and saw nothing wrong with it. It's exactly what I'd expect from that type of person. I did read some of the Bible when I was a kid.

All civilians living in Gaza are collectively guilty…

 

…Eliyahu ruled that there was absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians during a potential massive military offensive on Gaza aimed at stopping the rocket launchings. …

 

…According to Jewish war ethics, wrote Eliyahu, an entire city holds collective responsibility for the immoral behavior of individuals.

 

Paragraph 2 above is a war crime when carried out.

 

Can you honestly say you see nothing wrong here?

18 minutes ago, MrMojoRisin said:

Precision laser guided missiles and yet 3,000+ dead babies.

 

How gullible (or prejudiced) does one have to be to hide behind such transparent idiocy.

 

JDAM ordnance costs a heap of money and Israel doesn't have an unlimited supply. So I'll hazard a guess and say that most or all of the bombs hit their intended targets, as opposed to the IAF just flying around looking for targets of opportunity.

 

Why there were civilians in the area when the bombs hit? Best ask the leader of Hamas who uses his supposed brothers and sisters as human shields and blows them up when they try to leave.

 

At any rate, your description of the Israeli bombardment as "carpet bombing" is just plain wrong therefore hard to take anything you say seriously.

9 minutes ago, norfolkandchance said:

Oh, yes they have.

 

You clearly have no idea what area bombing is.

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What did he say?

 

Why do you not pull out and post the parts you think are indefensible? 

 

Don't be so intellectually lazy.  

sorry, I was in the process of doing that, it’s particularly difficult on a smart phone

6 hours ago, Neeranam said:

What is the death count now? 

Hamas death count or the truth?

2 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

All civilians living in Gaza are collectively guilty…

 

…Eliyahu ruled that there was absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians during a potential massive military offensive on Gaza aimed at stopping the rocket launchings. …

 

…According to Jewish war ethics, wrote Eliyahu, an entire city holds collective responsibility for the immoral behavior of individuals.

 

Paragraph 2 above is a war crime when carried out.

 

Can you honestly say you see nothing wrong here?

 

It's the standard eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth stuff you expect from that part of the world, been hearing it since Bible school. I don't know why you're getting so upset by it, it's not like this guy is in charge unlike say Ayatollah whatsisname.