Pattaya Bar Worker Allegedly Kidnapped by Group of Men

[itsari]

7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It was not reported that she "could not recall the detail" of the earlier incident, she said that she did not know the full details.

 

7 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It was not reported that she "could not recall the detail" of the earlier incident, she said that she did not know the full details.

Then recall what you know if you wish to assist in knowing what has happened to the missing woman .

Smething to hide maybe sad man

Edited November 11, 2023 by itsari
Needs more information

[Liverpool Lou]

1 hour ago, Celsius said:

Sounds like quality Chinese operation 

Sounds like you didn't read the article...it's pretty certain that the security guard who spoke to the men would know if they weren't Thais.

[Liverpool Lou]

3 minutes ago, itsari said:

8 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It was not reported that she "could not recall the detail" of the earlier incident, she said that she did not know the full details.

Then recall what you know if you wish to assist in knowing what has happened to the missing woman .

Gawd...

Perhaps she did tell them what she knew, she did not say she could not recall!

Edited November 11, 2023 by Liverpool Lou

[gjoo888]

When someone is kidnapped, why conceal her identity? This is not the time to "protect her privacy." You would think at least a picture of her would help in case she was spotted at a gas station, 7-11, etc.. In my home country, when somone is kidnapped, the victime's name and picture is shown everywhere possible in hopes that someone will see her and report it to the police.

[itsari]

6 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Gawd...

Perhaps she did tell them what she knew, she did not say she could not recall!

Make your mind up Mr

Much sadness protruding from you

Edited November 11, 2023 by itsari
More information

[Liverpool Lou]

Just now, itsari said:

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Gawd...

Perhaps she did tell them what she knew, she did not say she could not recall!

Make your mind up Mr

I haven't changed my mind but you may need to check the distinction between the words "recall" and "know".   

She said that she "did not know " the details.  It was not reported that she "could not recall" the details.  Mr.

[off road pat]

5 hours ago, Shop mak said:

Money lenders at work again, or a ex-bf? 

 

two days prior to the incident, an individual had been enquiring about the bar worker at their workplace. However, she could not recall the specifics of that interaction. Worasuda suspects that the abductor could possibly be the bar worker’s ex-husband

Hm,...If it is her ex the police will find him quiet easily !

[Ralf001]

2 hours ago, PJ71 said:

Just a normal Wednesday morning then - lol.

 

She was tidy.... kinda wish I was one of the pissed up guys in the back rather than the sober moron engaging in the daily work grind.

[itsari]

3 hours ago, wensiensheng said:

How can she not recall the detail of a weird incident that happened only two days ago? It would be understandable if she didn’t know then or now, but if she knew then, surely she can recall now. Unless she doesn’t want further involved so she invoked the trump family strategy.

 

[NanLaew]

4 hours ago, Ralf001 said:

 

Driving to work last Wednesday, stopped at my local 7/11 to buy a chocolate milk for the drive.

 

Pickup parked out front with 5 pissed up Thai guys in the back, instore girl at counter before me buys 4 packs of condoms and 2 tubes of KY.... then gets into passenger seat of the pickup !!

 

You just witnessed what you are missing out on with this morning chocolate milk thing.

Edited November 11, 2023 by NanLaew

[NanLaew]

1 hour ago, ChaiyaTH said:

I been to restaurants where the waitress ask me my name and where I come from 3 days in a row. Not surprised at all.

What's it like being nondescript and otherwise unremarkable?

[Ralf001]

3 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

bab

 

You just witnessed what you are missing out on with this morning chocolate milk thing.

 

Weekdays, my work says I cannot partake.

[soalbundy]

2 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"...has to do with somebody owing money".

How do you know that?   There was no mention of anything like that in the OP.

He can read between the lines.

[Sig]

5 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It was not reported that she "could not recall the detail" of the earlier incident, she said that she did not know the full details.

Not sure what article you read....
In the article that was linked, it said, "Worasuda also revealed that two days before the incident, an individual had been enquiring about the bar worker at their workplace. However, she could not recall the specifics of that interaction." (emphasis added)
As you were... go ahead and get back to correcting everyone's comments....
Edit: And I subsequently saw following posts where you doubled down or should I say tripled down (were there more?) adamantly certain that it wasn't recalling that was the difficulty. It was knowing?? Before being so vigorous in defending yourself or wantonly throwing  criticism about, you may want to double check the point your are going on about. But, that's up to you. Carry on.

Edited November 11, 2023 by Sig

[bristolgeoff]

Something happened that she is not talking about,what the friend was involved in.Money owed or something else this is pattaya and you can only guess the real reason

[FruitPudding]

9 hours ago, wensiensheng said:

“A city known for its vibrant nightlife”

 

is that a new descriptor for sleaze?

 

Can you think of a different definition?

 

Isn't all vibrant nightlife sleaze?

[radiochaser]

5 hours ago, Sig said:

Not sure what article you read....
In the article that was linked, it said, "Worasuda also revealed that two days before the incident, an individual had been enquiring about the bar worker at their workplace. However, she could not recall the specifics of that interaction." (emphasis added)
As you were... go ahead and get back to correcting everyone's comments....
Edit: And I subsequently saw following posts where you doubled down or should I say tripled down (were there more?) adamantly certain that it wasn't recalling that was the difficulty. It was knowing?? Before being so vigorous in defending yourself or wantonly throwing  criticism about, you may want to double check the point your are going on about. But, that's up to you. Carry on.

Watch it Bud.  Lou sees all, hears all, knows all!  You must not contradict his posts!  That might be in the rules he likes to tell people to read!  

P.S. Lou's vast repository of knowledge, is ... omnipotent, but not necessarily benevolent!   Remember that!   

Edited November 11, 2023 by radiochaser

[kiwikeith]

14 hours ago, Hanuman2547 said:

Lots of different possibilities.  Most likely some type of money/drug debt or a jilted former BF/husband back to reclaim his "true love".

Or, maybe she knows something she shouldn't, and talk to much, 

Crime in Pattaya is getting worse, the whole country now has school children smoking gunga in the toilets, wait until Casino's come, then the real fireworks and mafia will rise. 

[jacko45k]

Clue.... one is likely off topic if quoting a dictionary definition!

[Gottfrid]

18 hours ago, wensiensheng said:

“A city known for its vibrant nightlife”

 

is that a new descriptor for sleaze?

No, it´s a description for vibrant nightlife.
 

18 hours ago, Iron Tongue said:

Whatever happened, it was not random and has to do with somebody owing money.

 

 

How do you no that? are you the kidnapper?

[Liverpool Lou]

13 hours ago, Sig said:

Not sure what article you read....
In the article that was linked, it said, "Worasuda also revealed that two days before the incident, an individual had been enquiring about the bar worker at their workplace. However, she could not recall the specifics of that interaction." (emphasis added)
As you were... go ahead and get back to correcting everyone's comments....
Edit: And I subsequently saw following posts where you doubled down or should I say tripled down (were there more?) adamantly certain that it wasn't recalling that was the difficulty. It was knowing?? Before being so vigorous in defending yourself or wantonly throwing  criticism about, you may want to double check the point your are going on about. But, that's up to you. Carry on.

There was good reason for my doubling down; in the link to the original OP the following is what was reported...

"They forcibly took her into a black sedan and drove away. Ms. Worasuda mentioned that two days ago, someone had come to her workplace to inquire about the abductee, but she was unsure about the exact details. Ms. Worasuda suspected that the abductor might be the victim’s ex-husband".

No mention there about the phrase "she could not recall the specifics...", regardless of your emphasis of something that wasn't reported in that link.

To use your words...before being so vigorous in attacking me or wantonly throwing  criticism about, you may want to double check the point you are going on about. But, that's up to you. Carry on.

Edited November 12, 2023 by Liverpool Lou

[markus]

On 11/11/2023 at 3:57 AM, Shop mak said:

Money lenders at work again, or a ex-bf? 

 

two days prior to the incident, an individual had been enquiring about the bar worker at their workplace. However, she could not recall the specifics of that interaction. Worasuda suspects that the abductor could possibly be the bar worker’s ex-husband

Thanks for the information.

[Jiggo]

Not a kidnapping until there are demands, till then it's a abduction.

[Sig]

21 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

There was good reason for my doubling down; in the link to the original OP the following is what was reported...

"They forcibly took her into a black sedan and drove away. Ms. Worasuda mentioned that two days ago, someone had come to her workplace to inquire about the abductee, but she was unsure about the exact details. Ms. Worasuda suspected that the abductor might be the victim’s ex-husband".

No mention there about the phrase "she could not recall the specifics...", regardless of your emphasis of something that wasn't reported in that link.

To use your words...before being so vigorous in attacking me or wantonly throwing  criticism about, you may want to double check the point you are going on about. But, that's up to you. Carry on.

Ok, so you're going to feign as though you only read the first of the two linked articles and try saying you were only referring to that one and didn't know that the other article gave information contrary to what you wrote? And even that first article doesn't line up with what you said! You said, "she said that she didn't know the full details." It didn't say that. As you've quoted above... it said, "she was unsure".
But according to your other posts, it is clear that you were aware (but thanks for playing the feign game) and had read at least part of the second linked article and would have been aware that it said that she "could not recall the specifics" (emphasis added). But you had to go on doing your thing even though it is clear that is not the case, even according to what you yourself posted and presumably read (see copied posts below displaying your folly). It's reasonable to presume you read it because you felt the need to include your snide remark to a person that "we're all able to read the, very clear, OP." Well... if you're able to read it and it's very clear, then what in the heck are you going on about!?!? That very thing that is so very clear, which you're able to read said, "she could not recall the specifics" (emphasis added). Nothing in either article about "knowing"!
Back to your post/comment policing of anything not oh so very clear content with your impeccable reading acumen. Do better.

Edited November 13, 2023 by Sig