Jump to content

Unjust arrest sparks outrage over police corruption in Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg


A 50 year old Thai man aired his grievances about police corruption after being unjustly arrested for illegal possession of a gun that was not his. The police demanded a 50,000 baht bail fee, which was eventually negotiated to 20,000 baht, in exchange for his release.

 

The victim, Piboon Tanthai, claimed that someone had left the gun at his house just before the police raided his home today.

 

The event unravelled in Phatthalung Province, where Piboon lives. The police, without a search warrant, barged into his residence and found a long-barrelled gun in a fertiliser sack on the premises. Piboon was then taken into custody for further investigation at a police station in Phatthalung.

 

The charges of illegal possession of firearms were levelled against Piboon, who spent over three hours in the interrogation room. He revealed that during the questioning, the police discussed a sum of 50,000 baht to clear the case without proceeding with the charges.

 

Piboon, unable to afford the amount, negotiated it down to 20,000 baht. He then contacted his wife to borrow the money to pay the police investigators.

 

by Nattapong Westwood

 

Full story: The Thaiger 2023-12-12

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

  • Sad 8
Posted
45 minutes ago, webfact said:

The victim, Piboon Tanthai, claimed that someone had left the gun at his house just before the police raided his home today.

 

Dat's not mine!

I dindunuffin!

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, keith101 said:

I know nothing about Thai Law but asking someone for x amount of money to clear themselves of a charge to me sounds more like corruption than bail where you are released to appear in court at a later date

Pay to the police or pay to  a regulator, what difference? Deferred prosecutions are standard practise in the US and UK.

 

Pay a 'fine', nothing else to see......

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, hotchilli said:

So this wasn't about bail money that should be set by a court.

This was blatant corruption.. pay us and we drop the case.

Never heard of police bail?

Posted
3 minutes ago, timendres said:

I do not know of any "pay to the police" option in the US that is anything short of illegal.

The point being made was that:

 

8 minutes ago, Scott Tracy said:

but asking someone for x amount of money to clear themselves of a charge to me sounds more like corruption than bail where you are released to appear in court at a later date

 

Happens all the time. Police, being those with the power of arrest and/or power of prosecution. SEC, DOJ, on the spot fines...

  • Sad 1
Posted

Next week's headline news, local man unable to pay loan sharks back money borrowed for bail. Wishes he had "friends" gun back!

Posted
2 hours ago, timendres said:
2 hours ago, Scott Tracy said:

Pay to the police or pay to  a regulator, what difference? Deferred prosecutions are standard practise in the US and UK.

 

I do not know of any "pay to the police" option in the US that is anything short of illegal.

 

And I don't know of any in the UK.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

There is a simple solution to these shakedowns. In any conversation with the police Thailand's largest criminal organisation, get your phone out and record the conversation. They once tried it on with me when I was leaving Swampy airport, saying my brand new UK passport was a fake and to follow them into a small room. I got out my phone to record, and suddenly the passport was okay after all, I wasn't worth their trouble when there were plenty of other potential 'customers' coming through. Of course, they might threaten you and it could get nasty, but it's worth a try.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

 

And I don't know of any in the UK.

Correct.

In the UK the police can require someone to act as surety before allowing bail to an uncharged person. No money changes hands, but the person acting as surety can be required to pay the agreed sum if the suspect does not surrender to bail or breaches the conditions of bail.

 

Posted
41 minutes ago, chickenslegs said:

Correct.

In the UK the police can require someone to act as surety before allowing bail to an uncharged person. No money changes hands, but the person acting as surety can be required to pay the agreed sum if the suspect does not surrender to bail or breaches the conditions of bail.

 

Same in Australia.

Posted (edited)
On 12/12/2023 at 11:27 AM, webfact said:

The victim, Piboon Tanthai, claimed that someone had left the gun at his house just before the police raided his home today

Happens often at my house to. 😂

I find guns everywhere, the owners come back the next day or two to pick their guns up. 

 

Edited by SAFETY FIRST

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...