Just now, Jingthing said:

Tucker Carlson is actively supporting Putin and has been for years.

Of course he's a traitor.

Putin is not America's enemy. There is no war between Russia and the US. Can you give concrete examples of this "active support" that Carlson gives Putin?  I've heard the accusations but never seen any actual evidence.

1 minute ago, Hanaguma said:

Putin is not America's enemy. There is no war between Russia and the US. Can you give concrete examples of this "active support" that Carlson gives Putin?  I've heard the accusations but never seen any actual evidence.

Funny if you have been following Russian propaganda you would know according to Putin the USA is their number one enemy, also the entire "collective west", not to mention their obession with hating LGBT people.

I posted a clip before where Tucker openly says he is rooting for Russia.

I can't help you if you fail to follow basic news.

Come back when you're caught up. 

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Funny if you have been following Russian propaganda you would know according to Putin the USA is their number one enemy, also the entire "collective west", not to mention their obession with hating LGBT people.

I posted a clip before where Tucker openly says he is rooting for Russia.

I can't help you if you fail to follow basic news.

Come back when you're caught up. 

Would you say the same if a journalist interviews President Xi of China, or Kim in North Korea, or Khameni of Iran?   I think not.

 

This is all just an offshoot of anti-Trump derangement and hysteria, with a healthy dose of the debunked Russian conspiracy from 2016 thrown in. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin met with US journalist Tucker Carlson on Tuesday for an interview, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told a daily media briefing on Wednesday. The American had announced the imminent release of the footage hours earlier.

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/591999-peskov-carlson-putin-interview/

On 2/5/2024 at 12:43 PM, ozimoron said:

 

I've followed what he's said for many years. I'm missing nothing. Carlson is a dirtbag.

Are you telling me that you watched to his 45 minute pod casts when you hate the guy. I'll be watching with bated breath. Can't wait.

6 hours ago, impulse said:

May as well hear it from the man himself.  But I'll bet most of the guys on here won't spend the 5 minutes.

 

We're in Moscow to Interview Vladimir Putin.  Here's why we're doing it.

 

https://tuckercarlson.com/why-were-in-moscow/

 

My thoughts entirely.....why rely on a biased itntermediary when you can watch and hear the man speak? 

7 hours ago, bendejo said:

State Department should give him a few hours on the hot seat when he returns to the country (private jet? if so who foots the bill?).   When he goes on the media to denounce them the response is "just keeping our border safe, sir.  An important issue with you, is it not?"

 

Remember James O'Keefe?  He went down to the RIo Grande to make a mockery of the border patrol and he got busted.  wah-wah

 

 

Yes Tucker must have clean background because the FEDs are vicious and rooting out indiscretions and using them to blackmail people they don't like....I keep waiting for the almost inevitable rape allegation from 25 years ago, corroborated by an equally fake rapee from the same era. All that will be lacking is any evidence. They did the same to Assange and they will be doing the same to Tucker very shortly. Love him or hate him, you should be very sad when the Fed closes him down for challenging the establishment. 

4 minutes ago, retarius said:

Yes Tucker must have clean background because the FEDs are vicious and rooting out indiscretions and using them to blackmail people they don't like....I keep waiting for the almost inevitable rape allegation from 25 years ago, corroborated by an equally fake rapee from the same era. All that will be lacking is any evidence. They did the same to Assange and they will be doing the same to Tucker very shortly. Love him or hate him, you should be very sad when the Fed closes him down for challenging the establishment. 

Conspiracy theory garbage par for the course for Tucker fanboys.

17 minutes ago, impulse said:

Russian President Vladimir Putin met with US journalist Tucker Carlson on Tuesday for an interview, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told a daily media briefing on Wednesday. The American had announced the imminent release of the footage hours earlier.

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/591999-peskov-carlson-putin-interview/

Not a journalist. 

1 hour ago, Hanaguma said:

Would you say the same if a journalist interviews President Xi of China, or Kim in North Korea, or Khameni of Iran?   I think not.

 

This is all just an offshoot of anti-Trump derangement and hysteria, with a healthy dose of the debunked Russian conspiracy from 2016 thrown in. 

No.

Tucker is not an objective journalist.

He's a useful idiot for Putin.

As said he has been actively supporting Putin.

What conspiracy?

Putin did help Trump. Documented fact.

 

 

Edited February 7, 20242 yr by Jingthing

39 minutes ago, retarius said:

Yes Tucker must have clean background because the FEDs are vicious and rooting out indiscretions and using them to blackmail people they don't like....I keep waiting for the almost inevitable rape allegation from 25 years ago, corroborated by an equally fake rapee from the same era. All that will be lacking is any evidence. They did the same to Assange and they will be doing the same to Tucker very shortly. Love him or hate him, you should be very sad when the Fed closes him down for challenging the establishment. 

 

His interview with Russell Brand was probably a good heads up for him.  Remember he tried to interview Putin a couple of years back, but backed off under threat(s) from the gub'ment.  Besides which, he didn't have a venue he could count on as he still worked at Fox. 

 

Now, he's got his own website and support from Musk, so it'll be tougher to squelch.

 

Edit:  BTW, I thought my previously linked article from the Daily Caller was poorly edited because they wrote as if the interview had already taken place.  According to the Russkie press, it seems that it happened yesterday.

 

 

Edited February 7, 20242 yr by impulse

1 hour ago, retarius said:

Are you telling me that you watched to his 45 minute pod casts when you hate the guy. I'll be watching with bated breath. Can't wait.

 

So, you just listen to the 'true' side? 

 

I'm still waiting for you to reveal your special sources on Russia. Odd that you accuse others, whom you don't know, of listening to propaganda yet you won't reveal your own sources.  They say the make of a man is in how he views others.

 

7 minutes ago, rabas said:

 

So, you just listen to the 'true' side? 

 

I'm still waiting for you to reveal your special sources on Russia. Odd that you accuse others, whom you don't know, of listening to propaganda yet you won't reveal your own sources.  They say the make of a man is in how he views others.

 

No I read, listen to, and watch both sides. Only then do I make ups my mind who, in my opinion is lying and who is telling the truth or at least amore rational explanation of what has occurred. Sometimes it is very difficult to make ups your mind as politicians and journalists, from both sides, habitually lie. According to US spokespeople the US never does anything wrong and is always on the right side of any issue. This serves for most people as the only misinformation they receive. I think it is dumb to ever listen too only one side of a story......try listening to your friend's divorce tales. 

The responses of announcing a simple interview of Putin by the RU haters/bashers is all a bit telling.  Does explain how good the MSM propaganda machine is, how ignorant people are, and why the world is in the state that it is ... or told that it is.

 

Rather embarrassing actually   

The planet certainly has nothing to worry about, as humans will do themselves in before the next century, if not the next decade or 2.   Som naa na

 

Why I'm anti-social and fairly self sufficient 

Edited February 7, 20242 yr by KhunLA

20 minutes ago, rabas said:

 

So, you just listen to the 'true' side? 

 

I'm still waiting for you to reveal your special sources on Russia. Odd that you accuse others, whom you don't know, of listening to propaganda yet you won't reveal your own sources.  They say the make of a man is in how he views others.

 

Assuming you are responding to a human………..

2 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Putin is not America's enemy. 

Putin's goal is to restore the USSR and exercize hegemony over Eastern Europe.

 

You okay with that?

Just reminds the interview Megan Kelly had with Putin. Still laughing ))))

Tucker Karlson is true journalist and I'm waiting in anticipation of published interview. Must be great to watch - 2 hours! OMG! As I heard Putin can't spare more than 10 minutes - he is very-very busy President. 

2 hours.

24 minutes ago, rabas said:

 

So, you just listen to the 'true' side? 

 

I'm still waiting for you to reveal your special sources on Russia. Odd that you accuse others, whom you don't know, of listening to propaganda yet you won't reveal your own sources.  They say the make of a man is in how he views others.

 

Putin is a neoCommunist wanting to put the USSR back together.

 

I guess you are on board with that.

 

I used to work in Russia, and watched the country disintegrate under Putin.

4 minutes ago, retarius said:

No I read, listen to, and watch both sides. Only then do I make ups my mind who, in my opinion is lying and who is telling the truth or at least amore rational explanation of what has occurred. Sometimes it is very difficult to make ups your mind as politicians and journalists, from both sides, habitually lie. According to US spokespeople the US never does anything wrong and is always on the right side of any issue. This serves for most people as the only misinformation they receive. I think it is dumb to ever listen too only one side of a story......try listening to your friend's divorce tales. 

 

OK, fair enough so far but you didn't reveal much, just that you listen and decide. I think most will say something similar including that the other 'side' is misinformed. Also agree most politicians and journalists have other priorities.

 

But my question is where do you get your information from, where does it originate? Another poster gave a great account of his sources of views on Russia. This is a critical because of Russia's historic weaponization of disinformation on a scale that most Westerners can't comprehend, as in it doesn't compute.

17 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Putin is a neoCommunist wanting to put the USSR back together.

 

I guess you are on board with that.

 

I used to work in Russia, and watched the country disintegrate under Putin.

I guess you are on board with that.

 

And I thought I was leading the pack 🙂

 

Thank you. You are the second person to describe were their actual views come from. Mine are similar in that they come from long time experience with Russia and Russians. Though I never lived there, I did meet Lenin when I was there.

 

Edited February 7, 20242 yr by rabas

7 minutes ago, rabas said:

Though I never lived there, I did meet Lenin when I was there.

 

I also met Lenin, but he seemingly slept through our encounter.

25 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Putin's goal is to restore the USSR and exercize hegemony over Eastern Europe.

 

You okay with that?

If Europe has a problem with it, then Europe can handle it. They have 10 times the GDP of Russia plus   a large technological advantage. All they lack is motivation and a set of balls. 

Just now, Danderman123 said:

I also met Lenin, but he seemingly slept through our encounter.

 

Yes, he looked deathly in his mausoleum in 1966.  Actually quite waxy.

19 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

If Europe has a problem with it, then Europe can handle it. They have 10 times the GDP of Russia plus   a large technological advantage. All they lack is motivation and a set of balls. 

I'm not asking who can stop Putin, I am asking if you agree with Putin's goals.

21 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I'm not asking who can stop Putin, I am asking if you agree with Putin's goals.

I would rather it didnt happen, but I don't think it is worth the expenditure of American money or blood.  It is 99% a European regional problem.

It's about time to name names - those Americans who sympathize with the neoCommunist Putin.

 

What's the term for those who support neoCommunism? "UnAmerican".

7 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Would you say the same if a journalist interviews President Xi of China, or Kim in North Korea, or Khameni of Iran?   I think not.

 

This is all just an offshoot of anti-Trump derangement and hysteria, with a healthy dose of the debunked Russian conspiracy from 2016 thrown in. 

The interesting part is not that he interviews Putin, it's that Putin unusually accepted to be interviewed by a Western journalist.

9 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Putin is not America's enemy. There is no war between Russia and the US. Can you give concrete examples of this "active support" that Carlson gives Putin?  I've heard the accusations but never seen any actual evidence.

There wasn't a war between the US and the USSR, either.

 

You seem confused which side you are on.

1 hour ago, candide said:

The interesting part is not that he interviews Putin, it's that Putin unusually accepted to be interviewed by a Western journalist.

Because Karlson is a useful idiot.

10 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Tucker is not an objective journalist.

 

Or as Hannity said of himself "I never said I was a journalist."

It looks like that would be true of the whole Fox prime time lineup.