Trump pays $175 million bond

[Yellowtail]

10 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

You are probably referring to FDR's New Deal, which you never got over.

 

Social Security is probably a nightmare for you.  I remember when Republicans called "Medicare" as Marxist.

Why would it be a nightmare for me? I don't like it and I would vote to have it abolished, but it does not bother me at all.

 

In any event, I was not talking about FDR or Social Security. 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, Roo Island said:

Please post a link that you like for this topic.

Internal Revenue Service | An official website of the United States government (irs.gov)

[Danderman123]

12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I never said Forbes was leftist. 

You posted that an article in Forbes was leftist.

 

That was your way of avoiding the content of the article, which described the impact of Trump's tax cuts for billionaires, which was an economic disaster for the middle class.

[Yellowtail]

11 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

You posted that an article in Forbes was leftist.

 

That was your way of avoiding the content of the article, which described the impact of Trump's tax cuts for billionaires, which was an economic disaster for the middle class.

I said the article was a leftist hit-piece, not that the publication was leftist. 

 

In any event we're still waiting for you to explain the details of Trump's "tax cuts for billionaires"

 

I

 

 

[Roo Island]

41 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Internal Revenue Service | An official website of the United States government (irs.gov)

Troll

[Roo Island]

19 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I said the article was a leftist hit-piece, not that the publication was leftist. 

 

In any event we're still waiting for you to explain the details of Trump's "tax cuts for billionaires"

 

I

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/09/trump-tax-cuts-helped-billionaires-pay-less

 

Trump’s tax cuts helped billionaires pay less than the working class for first time

 

Economists calculate richest 400 families in US paid an average tax rate of 23% while the bottom half of households paid a rate of 24.2%

[Yellowtail]

26 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/oct/09/trump-tax-cuts-helped-billionaires-pay-less

 

Trump’s tax cuts helped billionaires pay less than the working class for first time

 

Economists calculate richest 400 families in US paid an average tax rate of 23% while the bottom half of households paid a rate of 24.2%

In 2022, 40.1% of households paid no federal income taxes. 

 

In 2021, the:

Top 1%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 45.78%

Top 5%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 65.64%

Top 10%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 75.81%

Top 25%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 89.23%

Top 50%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 97.66%

Bottom 50%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 2.34%

 

The top 1%’s adjusted gross income share was 26.3%, while their share of total federal income taxes paid was 45.78%.

 

But not to worry, Biden has hired thousands of new IRS agents to go after small business owners. 

Foundation - National Taxpayers Union (ntu.org)

[Lacessit]

On 4/18/2024 at 1:24 AM, G_Money said:

 Lost your mind!  But the saving grace is you are not alone.

 

Every liberal has lost theirs.

Trump supporters never had a mind to lose. Sheeple.

[Lacessit]

6 hours ago, Negativ said:

You've all chosen a life of expat in an emerging country.

Living comfortably off the hard work of local poor people.

You really all are republicans.

Stop trying to look like decent people.

You live in Thailand.

You ain't. Never will be

 

 

My Thai GF would think your post is deranged.

[Roo Island]

7 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

In 2022, 40.1% of households paid no federal income taxes. 

 

In 2021, the:

Top 1%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 45.78%

Top 5%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 65.64%

Top 10%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 75.81%

Top 25%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 89.23%

Top 50%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 97.66%

Bottom 50%’s share of Federal Income Taxes paid was 2.34%

 

The top 1%’s adjusted gross income share was 26.3%, while their share of total federal income taxes paid was 45.78%.

 

But not to worry, Biden has hired thousands of new IRS agents to go after small business owners. 

Foundation - National Taxpayers Union (ntu.org)

https://www.budget.senate.gov/chairman/newsroom/press/republicans-irs-cuts-to-add-24-billion-to-the-deficit-finds-cbo-

 

Republicans’ IRS cuts to add $24 billion to the deficit, finds CBO

[G_Money]

16 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

You are especially fond of Trump's tax cut for billionaires?

1.  Doesn’t effect me as I’m not and most likely  all of the usual suspects posting are not billionaires.

 

That being said I’ve got no problem with it.  They still pay more than myself or anyone else posting.

 

That being said if they do get a tax break, bid deal!  Most are innovators.  They put money back into their business and create jobs.  Capitalism.  
 

Their high achievers.  More than myself or anyone else here posting.

 

2.  I’m more concerned about about the policies closer to average working American.

 

Securing the Border, violent crimes, lenient District Attorneys (unless their going after Trump), inflation, dependence on foreign oil just to name a few.

Billionaire tax cuts are the least of my worries.

 

The past three and a half years have been a disaster.  Biden’s been the worst president in my lifetime.  Yes, even worse than Carter.

But to give you a direct answer.  Yes, I am “fond” of the tax cuts for billionaires.

 

[Roo Island]

4 minutes ago, G_Money said:

1.  Doesn’t effect me as I’m not and most likely  all of the usual suspects posting are not billionaires.

 

That being said I’ve got no problem with it.  They still pay more than myself or anyone else posting.

 

That being said if they do get a tax break, bid deal!  Most are innovators.  They put money back into their business and create jobs.  Capitalism.  
 

Their high achievers.  More than myself or anyone else here posting.

 

2.  I’m more concerned about about the policies closer to average working American.

 

Securing the Border, violent crimes, lenient District Attorneys (unless their going after Trump), inflation, dependence on foreign oil just to name a few.

Billionaire tax cuts are the least of my worries.

 

The past three and a half years have been a disaster.  Biden’s been the worst president in my lifetime.  Yes, even worse than Carter.

But to give you a direct answer.  Yes, I am “fond” of the tax cuts for billionaires.

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/21/trump-income-tax-returns-detailed-in-new-report-.html

 

The report reveals that Trump on his federal tax returns declared negative income in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2020, and that he paid a total of $1,500 in income taxes for the years 2016 and 2017. 

 

On their 2020 income tax returns, Trump and his wife Melania paid no federal income taxes and claimed a refund of $5.47 million, according to the report by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.

[G_Money]

11 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Shame on you. Not knowing the details of Trump's plan to Make America Great Again.

Do you?

[jerrymahoney]

11 hours ago, Roo Island said:

Please post a link that you like for this topic.

OK

https://twitter.com/eelarson/status/1780617494304309714

 

[G_Money]

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/21/trump-income-tax-returns-detailed-in-new-report-.html

 

The report reveals that Trump on his federal tax returns declared negative income in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2020, and that he paid a total of $1,500 in income taxes for the years 2016 and 2017. 

 

On their 2020 income tax returns, Trump and his wife Melania paid no federal income taxes and claimed a refund of $5.47 million, according to the report by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Your reply is irrelevant to Dandermans question or my reply.

 

English Comprehension not your strong point, with out a doubt.

 

 

[Roo Island]

5 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

OK

https://twitter.com/eelarson/status/1780617494304309714

 

I didn't ask you and it wasn't about this...

[G_Money]

9 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/21/trump-income-tax-returns-detailed-in-new-report-.html

 

The report reveals that Trump on his federal tax returns declared negative income in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2020, and that he paid a total of $1,500 in income taxes for the years 2016 and 2017. 

 

On their 2020 income tax returns, Trump and his wife Melania paid no federal income taxes and claimed a refund of $5.47 million, according to the report by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Good for him!  All legal.  If the liberal media source is accurate.  They have been known to lie, but you’re aware of that fact.

 

 I know you’re jealous but no need to hate.

 

 

[jerrymahoney]

21 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I didn't ask you and it wasn't about this...

You asked for a link I like to this topic.

 

The topic is: Trump pays $175 million bond
 

[cdnvic]

Removed several posts containing personal attacks. Calling others trolls included.

[Tug]

Hey has his bond been fully approved yet I recall there were questions as to it’s validity as to actually covering his liability or is it just another scam?

[LosLobo]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

Good for him!  All legal.  If the liberal media source is accurate.  They have been known to lie, but you’re aware of that fact.

 I know you’re jealous but no need to hate.

'All legal'.

Trump LLC was found guilty of tax fraud are you suggesting Trump's personal taxes would be any different?

Jury Finds Trump Organization Guilty of Tax Fraud Scheme – NBC New York

[jerrymahoney]

Just now, Tug said:

Hey has his bond been fully approved yet I recall there were questions as to it’s validity as to actually covering his liability or is it just another scam?

As per the Judge's order above, the 22 April hearing has gone from whether the Knight/Trump bond can justify its dodgy existence to the AG James et al having to prove why their objection to the bond was not taken "unnecessarily and for vexation" as per the wording of the objection 2506 statute

[Tug]

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

As per the Judge's order above, the 22 April hearing has gone from whether the Knight/Trump bond can justify its dodgy existence to the AG James et al having to prove why their objection to the bond was not taken "unnecessarily and for vexation" as per the wording of the objection 2506 statute

So is it still unsettled?im just a lay person seems unclear and thanks for the response 

Edited April 19 by Tug

[jerrymahoney]

9 minutes ago, Tug said:

So is it still unsettled?im just a lay person seems unclear and thanks for the response 

My take is that the Judge has basically approved the 16 April (lengthy) submission from Knight/Trump and will sign off officially unless AJ still objects.

 

Any official objection from AG James et al must be in writing as 19 April (EDT) as best I recall.

Edited April 19 by jerrymahoney

[Roo Island]

2 hours ago, G_Money said:

Good for him!  All legal.  If the liberal media source is accurate.  They have been known to lie, but you’re aware of that fact.

 

 I know you’re jealous but no need to hate.

 

 

Please show a credible link proving that the liberal media lies. We know Faux News does. It's the reason they recently paid 787 million and fired Tucker.

 

No hate here, but a lot coming from you.

[Roo Island]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

You asked for a link I like to this topic.

 

The topic is: Trump pays $175 million bond
 

I asked another member, not you. But thanks for your recent posts. Some good information!

[jerrymahoney]

10 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I asked another member, not you. But thanks for your recent posts. Some good information!

OK.

[Danderman123]

48 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Please show a credible link proving that the liberal media lies. We know Faux News does. It's the reason they recently paid 787 million and fired Tucker.

 

No hate here, but a lot coming from you.

When reputable news sources make a mistake, they usually correct their mistakes.

 

On the other hand, FOX just lies and rarely correct themselves.

[Roo Island]

9 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

When reputable news sources make a mistake, they usually correct their mistakes.

 

On the other hand, FOX just lies and rarely correct themselves.

And it's not just that they lie, they leave a lot out. Like most things negative towards Trump. Don't want to piss off the cult members like they did when calling Arizona for Biden. As you know, they don't like the truth, just friendly alternative facts.

[Roo Island]

Not a huge fan of Salon, but an interesting read.

 

https://www.salon.com/2024/04/16/absurd-experts-say-still-playing-games-with-fraud-bond--and-it-could-blow-up-in-his-face/

The insurer — based in California and registered in Delaware — does not have a license to issue bonds in New York or have the necessary certificate of qualification from the state Department of Financial Services, which Germain notes are required by New York insurance law.

 

"The AG has valid reasons for questioning the validity of a bond posted by an out-of-state insurer without a certificate from the Insurance department, and having inadequate capitalization to cover the bond," he added. "I am also somewhat doubtful that a reinsurance policy would so clearly cover a default on a surety bond."