Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Plus just 10% of what Joe squandered two years ago would cost about $2.3T.

 

Oh dear. Never mind. How sad. As I said, Biden won't be involved. He's OK, Jack! 

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about..

 

Maybe open your mind to facts and reality instead of fueling it with whatever confirms your own bias and political preferences..?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Excogitator said:

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about..

 

Maybe open your mind to facts and reality instead of fueling it with whatever confirms your own bias and political preferences..?

He gets all his facts at Fox News.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Excogitator said:

See my comment to Hanaguma above for clarity.

 

Also, importantly, the SPR oil was sold at an avgerage of 95 per barrel. So at an average buying price of 78 (to have a round figure), it means that Biden has, so far, made the USofA a whooping profit of more than 20% on this deal.

So yeah, great work Joe!

 

 

Only about 4.5% of the drawdown under Biden has been replaced so far. The evential cost to replace the other 95% could be much more - if it happens, Biden will not be involved - he'll be alright, Jack!! Oil is nudgng $86 again today and with inflation or even a small dollar devaluation, the USA could easily lose big time. And all that with the continuing troubles in the Middle East and ukraine, which could still kick prices much higher. 

 

It's supposed to be a strategic reserve - not a political one. The US itself wasn't even being attacked. Great work Joe!

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/02/26/the-biden-administrations-ongoing-strategic-petroleum-reserve-gamble/?sh=2483d9412a8e

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Excogitator said:

See my comment to Hanaguma above for clarity.

 

Also, importantly, the SPR oil was sold at an avgerage of 95 per barrel. So at an average buying price of 78 (to have a round figure), it means that Biden has, so far, made the USofA a whooping profit of more than 20% on this deal.

So yeah, great work Joe!

 

 

Only about 4.5% of the record and enormous drawdown under Biden has been replaced so far. The evential cost to replace the other 95% could be much more - if it happens, Biden will not be involved - he'll be alright, Jack!! Oil is nudgng $86 again today and with inflation or even a small dollar devaluation, the USA could easily lose big time. And all that with the continuing troubles in the Middle East and ukraine, which could still kick prices much higher. 

 

It's supposed to be a strategic reserve - not a political one. The US itself wasn't even being attacked. Great work Joe!

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/02/26/the-biden-administrations-ongoing-strategic-petroleum-reserve-gamble/?sh=2483d9412a8e

Posted
2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Only about 4.5% of the record and enormous drawdown under Biden has been replaced so far. The evential cost to replace the other 95% could be much more - if it happens, Biden will not be involved - he'll be alright, Jack!! Oil is nudgng $86 again today and with inflation or even a small dollar devaluation, the USA could easily lose big time. And all that with the continuing troubles in the Middle East and ukraine, which could still kick prices much higher. 

 

It's supposed to be a strategic reserve - not a political one. The US itself wasn't even being attacked. Great work Joe!

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/02/26/the-biden-administrations-ongoing-strategic-petroleum-reserve-gamble/?sh=2483d9412a8e

 

Double-post glitch. Or read it twice for effect!

Posted
30 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

He gets all his facts at Fox News.

 

I've linked my facts. None from Fox. Stop guessing.

  • Agree 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Excogitator said:

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about..

 

Maybe open your mind to facts and reality instead of fueling it with whatever confirms your own bias and political preferences..?

 

Aha - here comes the pot to call again. We'll get back to you if we have a minute. 

 

Best to Kettle. 

 

Bless. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Only about 4.5% of the drawdown under Biden has been replaced so far. The evential cost to replace the other 95% could be much more - if it happens, Biden will not be involved - he'll be alright, Jack!! Oil is nudgng $86 again today and with inflation or even a small dollar devaluation, the USA could easily lose big time. And all that with the continuing troubles in the Middle East and ukraine, which could still kick prices much higher. 

 

It's supposed to be a strategic reserve - not a political one. The US itself wasn't even being attacked. Great work Joe!

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/02/26/the-biden-administrations-ongoing-strategic-petroleum-reserve-gamble/?sh=2483d9412a8e

if it keeps an orange wannabe dictator out of the WH pretty strategic.

Posted
9 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

I don't like murdering dictators.

 

Yeah, you shouldn't murder dictators! Hopefully you don't like murdering non-dictators, as well.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, charleskerins said:

if it keeps an orange wannabe dictator out of the WH pretty strategic.

 

Oil and lawsuits all the same then - poltical. What a shame.

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Your facts are not linked but you speak Fox and try to deny it.

 

Several links within this topic already. How many from Fox? That's right. 0.

 

I haven't denied watching Fox but at least we can see your own pet source of news now - that expalins a lot.

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, charleskerins said:

I don't like murdering dictators.

I disagree!

I believe that ALL dictators should be murdered ASAP!

Edited by scottiejohn
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

And you give me grief about Fox News bwahaha.

Deny, deflect, ok it is true, so what. Take time to look at all the facts not just Fox who is all in on MAGA. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
10 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

How is politics a Pub topic?

I'm sure there used to be something at the start of the sub forum to say no politics, but I can't see it any more, so perhaps it is allowed now.

Posted
55 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

the 'tell me you got TDS without telling me you've got TDS' youtube clip

The three postings I made are outlines of how the shift is now real. A time long ago Republicans would engage in discussions on that type of topic. MAGA has a cult built on alliance to each other and the hatred to anybody who has a contrary view and they call all of them a lefty. They can't ever find a way to disengage the hate. Sad.

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 4/12/2024 at 3:46 PM, earlinclaifornia said:

Only you could be confused.  You win the "most trumper" here in this topic. LOL

 

Not really - just least Brandon LOL.

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 4/12/2024 at 8:44 AM, Excogitator said:

Throwing more insults and grasping at straws..

What a sad person you are.

 

Of course the SPR is not filled to the rim while it's being used to stabilise markets to everyone's (exept putins) benefit.

 

The SPR will be filled back up again, when the time is right, as US oil production is at record highs.

Yeah, after the election....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...