1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

So, you think any of Trump's adulterous acts are okay, because someone else somewhere else committed sex crimes?

 

Really?

Once again you try and put words into people’s mouths.

 

Back at you.

 

Do you?

5 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

I understand that it is a good show for the prosecutor to bring her to court and let her talk.

But is that really important?

He is accused of falsifying business records to influence the election.

Does anybody have to hear from her what he was wearing on that day and how he behaved to make up their mind if he falsified business records or not?

 

It's like when one person in a couple admits that they had extramarital sex. Is it really necessary to tell all the details of when and how? Or is it enough to admit that sex happened? Details are irrelevant.

 

 

Remember that some did not believe her going into today. So details are important to establish credibility.

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There are only twelve opinions that matter.

Your most intelligent answer to date.

 

And yours isn’t one of them.

4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

So, you think any of Trump's adulterous acts are okay, because someone else somewhere else committed sex crimes?

 

Really?

He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. 

 

Had he had called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. 

 

Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 

8 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Remember that some did not believe her going into today. So details are important to establish credibility.

Some who? 

11 minutes ago, G_Money said:

And can you provide proof/links that the links I provided from Fox are false?

 

I didn’t think so.

 

Next.

I stopped wasting my time on "Fox" viewers long ago. They are obviously NOT interested in facts or truth. Duh.

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. 

 

This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit.

9 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

"I used to try cases for a living. I still have a pretty good sense of what evidence is relevant, what is prejudicial and what is completely over-the-top inadmissible. What the judge is letting in today in the Trump trial in NYC will be remembered as a dark stain on our judicial system, reminiscent of corrupt dictatorships. Shame on the prosecution for undermining our judicial system," David Friedman, a lawyer and former U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration, posted on X. 

Fervently defending your hero till the bitter end, right?

8 hours ago, Tug said:

Poor poor trump so mistreated gee wizz you’d think hoseing a porn star as the wife stays home taking care of the new born was bad…..then trying to hide it during the election and using campaign funds to pay for it was bad go figure.and this is by far the least serious of the crimes he’s been indicted for…..ditch the albatross enough is enough lock him up 

I'm not sure 'hoseing' is the correct term here, considering Trump's tiny pecker and impressive gut, that might get in the way of all the fun.

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit.

Had he called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. 

 

Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 

50 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Policies. Give me a break. Didn't know that you are comedian. 

Well we know that the present occupier of the Oval Office has the exact opposite policies.

 

You must be one of those student loan beggers hahahahahahaha

24 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Remember that some did not believe her going into today. So details are important to establish credibility.

Spoken like an ignorant layman who gets his legal knowledge from the TV

17 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit.

Yeah, reality

6 hours ago, pomchop said:

finally a judge that seems to have a set of gonads....suck it up donnie your verdict day is coming soon...your hot shot lawyers are running out of attempts to delay or destroy this case.

 

look on the bright side donnie...you can soon whine and wimper and wag your mouth about how the entire judicials system is rigged against you and everyone and all the evidence is fake....oh thats right you already do that for years....never has there been a more innocent man than DJT....everyone without a red maga hat is out to get you.

We'll have to see about Merchans gonads. He admonished Trump, in court,  about contempt of court again (Trump's behavior in court, yesterday), but no action followed.

10 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Well we know that the present occupier of the Oval Office has the exact opposite policies.

 

You must be one of those student loan beggers hahahahahahaha

That is a tacit agreement that Trump has no policies; he just hijacked Biden's policies and say the opposite.

30 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. 

 

Had he had called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. 

 

Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 

I'll type slowly so you understand.

 

The Clinton campaign did label the Fusion payments as campaign expenses, but the subcategory was legal expenses rather than opposition research.

 

Trump, however, attempted to disguise a campaign expense as a business expense.

2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

That is a tacit agreement that Trump has no policies; he just hijacked Biden's policies and say the opposite.

Congrats. You have just written the dumbest thing I have ever seen on a message Board

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I'll type slowly so you understand.

 

The Clinton campaign did label the Fusion payments as campaign expenses, but the subcategory was legal expenses rather than opposition research.

 

Trump, however, attempted to disguise a campaign expense as a business expense.

Yep. Legal knowledge from TV LOL.

 

Hey genius, who decides whether the Great Orange Nightmare's payment to Sloppy Stormy is a campaign expense? (Watch this one)

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

Hearsay. Another girl who did have non-adulterous sex with Trump during the almost 6 years between his 2nd and 3rd marriage could have told her.

From the evidence thus far, Trump is a tightwad that wants to know where every cent is. So why would he shell out $130,000 for something completely baseless?

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Congrats. You have just written the dumbest thing I have ever seen on a message Board

This is so rich for someone who troll  incessantly dross postings. 

7 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Her testimony is just that. No corroborable evidence that the encounter was as she described.

You expect there to be evidence from a third party to a two-party horizontal tango? 

But I reckon there would be hotel rooms being booked by said person, evidence that they were in the same town at the same time etc. So we'll just wait for the devastating evidence to be presented by the Trump Defense lawyers to disprove it. After all, he can easily disprove these intimate details, right? 

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Yep. Legal knowledge from TV LOL.

 

Hey genius, who decides whether the Great Orange Nightmare's payment to Sloppy Stormy is a campaign expense? (Watch this one)

Ultimately, the FEC. Which they did.

26 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Yeah, reality

Kraepelin's paranoia:

 

"the furtive development, resulting
from inner causes, of a lasting, immovable
delusional system that is accompanied by
the complete retention of clearness and
order in thinking, willing and acting"

 

Does seem to fit many Trump supporters, doesn't it?

Daniels' lawyer says her accusations have been known for years. That doesn't make them honest. Personally, while not a fan of Trump, I believe very little of what Daniels is saying. 

35 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Had he called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. 

 

Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 

Is Hilary receiving free accommodation in your head a permissible campaign contribution I wonder?

Why did Trump wait until he ran for President that he sought an NDA from Stormy Daniels?

 

If he simply wanted to hide the affair from Melania, why didn't he tell Stormy Daniels to keep quiet from Day One?

36 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Quit being such a sizeist, Im fat and repulsive and have a pecker that best resembles a straw mushroom but I can make a girl scream just by walking in the room.

I figured already you have serious issues. 

22 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Congrats. You have just written the dumbest thing I have ever seen on a message Board

A pity you don't read back your own posts then.

6 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Daniels' lawyer says her accusations have been known for years. That doesn't make them honest. Personally, while not a fan of Trump, I believe very little of what Daniels is saying. 

Apparently she can describe Trump's genitalia very accurately. If she is lying about that, all Trump needs to discredit her is a photo shoot under legal supervision.

 

IMO that's as likely to happen as him taking the witness stand.

11 minutes ago, stevenl said:

A pity you don't read back your own posts then.

What a brilliant riposte! The Don Rickles of your Mommy's basement!