Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

If confirmed, this would be the first confirmation of a successful interception of Russian drones by Belarusian forces over the country's airspace.

They will probably be confirmed to be Ukrainian drones.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Bkk Brian said:

Not according to the Belarus monitoring group. 

Takes a few days, weeks,months,years for the real story to surface  remember the missile into Poland that should have invoked article 5 ?   ooops.

  • Confused 4
  • Agree 1
Posted

Given the amount of missile attacks that have taken place at army mass gatherings it defies belief why at this stage in the war Ukraine would suffer such a significant hit. It points to military and command dysfunction.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/06/drones-russia-poltava-airstrikes

 

As of Friday morning, 55 people were reported dead in the attack, with more than 300 injured. It is not clear if any of the victims were civilians. The institute is a training facility that gives soldiers skills in electronics, cyber-warfare and battlefield communications; its graduates are “the intellectual elite of the Ukrainian armed forces”, according to a poster on an information stand outside. In the current conditions of all-out war, many soldiers are sent there for a month of training before going back to the front.

  • Confused 4
Posted
20 minutes ago, MicroB said:

 

 

But your point is fallacious. Vietnam was a divided country, unless you are arguing that Russia has legitimate sovereignty over Ukraine. The Paris Peace Accords was not about America making peace with North Vietnam. It was about the political future of South Vietnam, and how the North and South would reconcile to create a single unitary state. South Vietnam had no future. As a result of the talks, the US would offer reconstruction aid to all of Vietnam.

 

You make claims what the US will do, while deliberately ignoring several examples. Western Europe; war ravaged, the US piled in aid, to friend and former foe alike. Similarly Japan.

 

Is the US particularly unreliable as an ally? No more than most other states, and a much better ally than many states.

 

The first quote attributed to Kissenger, which you misused to make a point, was Kissenger expressing a fear, in a call to William Buckley in 1968, about Nixon wanting to replace Thieu, and how would perceive that. Kissenger was passionate about America's allies.

 

As for the second quote, he never said that. He said

 

 

You have mixed up Kissenger with Lord Palmerston

 

 

Kissenger paraphrased Palmerston when describing Stalin's relationship with the world.

 

The USSR was once a good friend of Afghanistan. Look how it left the country. Russia is a good friend to the Syrian government, look how its leaving the country.

 

Putin is supposedly a good friend to his own people. Check the Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@vasyainthehay. This is a country that considers itself a superpower. It had all the opportunity in the world to transform itself, but instead brought yachts and gold plated toilets.

 

Putin treats his enemies (Chechenya) better than the people most loyal to him (those far flung easter Republics where people live a life still largely untoughed by even the late 20th Century, and who form the core of his troops in Ukraine).

You make good points well argued and sourced and thanks for the schooling, but at the risk of going off topic any further, which I hinted at in my post I shall accept your arguements in this instance and move on.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Given the amount of missile attacks that have taken place at army mass gatherings

 

Really? How many? 

 

Nothing like blaming the victims eh.........

 

Two off the top of my head.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yavoriv_military_base_attack

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/6/ukraine-orders-investigation-after-russian-attack-on-brigade-ceremony

 

 

  • Confused 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

So two, one over a year ago and the other 10 months ago = Given the amount of missile attacks that have taken place at army mass gatherings

 

With the missiles only in the air for 3 mins it was impossible for people to save themselves.

 

Nothing like blaming the victims eh.........

It is well known that Ukraine is riddled with Russian spies and citizens that are being turned with honeypots, money and the like. The point remains that a key army resource has been hit when common sense says you don't concentrate large numbers of important personel in a place that can be easily hit.

  • Confused 3
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/05/02/hundreds-of-russian-troops-gathered-out-in-the-open-they-didnt-know-the-ukrainians-had-aimed-four-atacms-rockets-at-them/

 

I think the major difference is the Ukraine will take an honest look at intelligence failures and OpSec. In Russia, there is blame and people tossed out of windows, whether or not it was their fault.

 

You have to remember, the whole of Ukraine is within range of Russian cruelty and barbarism.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, candide said:

China sides with the country which is bombing another country. 

It's a thread about Ukraine, not Vietnam.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MicroB said:

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/05/02/hundreds-of-russian-troops-gathered-out-in-the-open-they-didnt-know-the-ukrainians-had-aimed-four-atacms-rockets-at-them/

 

I think the major difference is the Ukraine will take an honest look at intelligence failures and OpSec. In Russia, there is blame and people tossed out of windows, whether or not it was their fault.

 

You have to remember, the whole of Ukraine is within range of Russian cruelty and barbarism.

All the more reason then not to repeat the same mistakes of the Russians. Someone in command has made a major mistake here in allowing  Russia a tactical win in a critical area.

  • Confused 1
Posted

It really is starting to look to the last Ukrainian and Putin won't fall anytime soon. That boat has long since sailed.

 

Putin thinks he can still win a war of attrition in Ukraine - Fighting will drag on while the prospects for diplomacy remain slim FT

 

https://archive.is/qS6MH#selection-1671.0-1675.67

 

Moreover, in the regions along the border that have witnessed Ukrainian retaliation, support for the Russian war effort is 10-15 per cent higher than the national average of roughly 60 per cent. These are the same regions where, before the war, thousands of people used to visit their Ukrainian relatives and friends across the border. The growth of pro-war sentiment isn’t necessarily resulting in more army recruits, but it makes the government’s job of persuading the Russian people to tolerate an open-ended fight with their neighbours easier.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

IMO the west has sold to Ukraine a serious miscalculation with regard to Putin; we the public, like Ukraine, seem to be under the impression Putin will stop if the war becomes too costly- I think this is wrong. It’s not, as some would argue, a war motivated by Putin’s ideology. It’s not, as others would argue, a war motivated by resources or money.The Kremlin has made a strategic decision to fight the war until it wins, at any cost. They view the war as a national security necessity. Putin is and has always been a national security hawk. He sees things through the eyes of a KGB agent- he is incredibly calculating - an evil genous as it were.

 

And, the west actually understands this. There is no miscalculation in western capitals; they know what Putin is doing and why he is doing it. And so we are successfully exploiting Russia’s national security concerns by using dripfed equipment to batter the Russian armed forces.

If the Russian army wins (which I suspect it will), it will be at far lesser strength than before the war. This weakens Russia and allows the US in particular to focus all of its efforts on the real threat to a free society which is of course the sleeping giant - China. My Kissinger point as it were explained in context.

 

Ukraine’s gamble against Russia risks becoming a blunder

 

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4862260-ukraine-advance-kursk-scrutiny/

 

George Beebe, director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said the Kursk operation was still in its early stages but “looks like it’s heading toward a failure.”

“The Russians have not diverted significant numbers of forces from the front lines in Ukraine. If anything, they’ve stepped on the accelerator pedal,” he said. “There seems to be a great deal of skepticism about what this incursion is going to accomplish, and I think growing concerns that it was a blunder.”

Russia appears to have accepted the reality of Ukrainian troops in Kursk for now. The Institute for the Study of War assessed this week that “Putin is attempting to preserve the Russian drive on Pokrovsk at the expense of delaying the clearing of Kursk.”

  • Confused 3
Posted

It's a tragic stuck record but as I point out above  "we are successfully exploiting Russia’s national security concerns by using dripfeed equipment to batter the Russian armed forces."  and besides which the cupboards are bare.You cannot give what you don't have or wish to keep for yourself.


Speaking at a Nato weapons talk, the Ukrainian president said western allies had begun to show a shortage of weapons and cooperation

 

https://archive.is/Dxsy1#selection-2493.4-2497.139

 

Volodymyr Zelensky accused Britain of slowing down deliveries of long-range missiles during key Nato weapons talks.
The Ukrainian president said Britain and other allies were showing a “shortage of missiles and cooperation” with fresh shipments of Storm Shadows and other ammunition.
He pleaded with London and Washington to loosen restrictions on the weapons to strike deep inside Russia as he seeks to turn the tide of Moscow’s invasion in Kyiv’s favour.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

It's a tragic stuck record but as I point out above  "we are successfully exploiting Russia’s national security concerns by using dripfeed equipment to batter the Russian armed forces."  and besides which the cupboards are bare.You cannot give what you don't have or wish to keep for yourself.


Speaking at a Nato weapons talk, the Ukrainian president said western allies had begun to show a shortage of weapons and cooperation

 

https://archive.is/Dxsy1#selection-2493.4-2497.139

 

Volodymyr Zelensky accused Britain of slowing down deliveries of long-range missiles during key Nato weapons talks.
The Ukrainian president said Britain and other allies were showing a “shortage of missiles and cooperation” with fresh shipments of Storm Shadows and other ammunition.
He pleaded with London and Washington to loosen restrictions on the weapons to strike deep inside Russia as he seeks to turn the tide of Moscow’s invasion in Kyiv’s favour.

This.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68273449.amp

 

Europe will need 10 years before it is fully ready to defend itself, the boss of Germany's biggest defence firm, Rheinmetall, told the BBC.

Armin Papperger said that ammunition stocks are currently "empty".

  • Confused 1
Posted

A Russian Language Video has been removed as has a post containing a quote and link from a Paywall site.

 

"All video content must be from a credible media source, and in English. Foreign languages, even with subtitles, are not permitted."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...