Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, transam said:

A thug, please tell all, take your time.......🤗

He has been convicted for football hooliganism and for headbutting a "mate" amongst all his other convictions including fraud and stalking a female journalist.

The 2 extremes of UK politcs; left and right; are regularly repelled by the UK electorate and are and will be little more than footnotes in history. Having such fruit loops in our society is the price the UK must pay for having a democracy, flawed though it may be.

Even Nigel Farage finds the guy repulsive and has labelled him a thug.

Edited by champers
  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Posted
1 minute ago, champers said:

He has been convicted for football hooliganism and for headbutting a "mate" amongst all his other convictions including fraud and stalking a female journalists.

The 2 extremes of UK politcs; left and right are regularly repelled by the UK electorate and are and will be little more than footnotes in history. Having such fruit loops in our society is the price the UK must pay for having a democracy, flawed though it may be.

Even Nigel Farage finds the guy repulsive and has labelled him a thug.

Who's Nigel Farage, oh a Trumpy............🤭

Posted
2 minutes ago, transam said:

Who's Nigel Farage, oh a Trumpy............🤭

Your mate Tommy begged Trump; when President; to allow him to move permanently to the US because he felt he was being persecuted in the UK. Trump didn't grant his wish.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Could you write it yourself. so that I can reply ?

I cannot really reply to the author of that piece


Eh?

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 minute ago, transam said:

You read some strange sites...........🤗


Erm, right. I know of these incidents, they are public knowledge, and the convictions are in the public domain. I was asked for a link so I Googled and found a link. I didn't go through each result to see which one was "best" or that transam might like.


I assume you didn't read it as you usually point blank refuse to read any link if you disagree with the narrative. Like in the BYD quality thread, quite laughable you are.

  • Confused 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Erm, right. I know of these incidents, they are public knowledge, and the convictions are in the public domain. I was asked for a link so I Googled and found a link. I didn't go through each result to see which one was "best" or that transam might like.


I assume you didn't read it as you usually point blank refuse to read any link if you disagree with the narrative. Like in the BYD quality thread, quite laughable you are.

I don't read strange sites, I leave that to those who do.........:whistling:

BYD thread...........:huh:

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:


Eh?

 

   Posters frequently provide links that do not actually back up their claims and I ended up reading articles for no reason .

   So, could you reply writing your own words rather than just doing a websearch and posting any old link ??

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, transam said:

I don't read strange sites, I leave that to those who do.........:whistling:

BYD thread...........:huh:

 True to form, refuses to read or acknowledge anything that contradicts your view. Understood.

Waste of time engaging with you, I don't know why I keep coming back.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Posters frequently provide links that do not actually back up their claims and I ended up reading articles for no reason .

   So, could you reply writing your own words rather than just doing a websearch and posting any old link ??


You mean like I did here:

 

Quote

Oh please. Yaxley-Lennon doesn't give a stuff about grooming or paedophilia as long as it is white people who are doing it. His good friend and senior EDL colleague and founder member  Richard Price was convicted of paedophilia related charges for making child porn, and possession of cocaine and crack cocaine. Yaxley-Lennon not only refused to condemn him, but publicly defended him, even leading an EDL campaign to have him released! Released from detention because of child porn!

Then there was Leigh Mcmillan, another senior EDL leader under Yaxley-Lennon (and friend) who was convicted of abusing a 10 year old girl more than 100 times. In fact the EDL had a disproportionately high percentage of members who had been convicted for child sexual offences. Quite an organisation he led! Lots of others inside convicted of child sexual abuse.

Oh but the Muslim grooming gang! Yeah! Brown paedos are a thing! He cared so much about them that he nearly caused their trial to collapse with his theatrics that could have seen them potentially freed! His actions on that occasion were extremely reckless and put the whole trial at risk. He knew that. He didn't care as it is only about him and how much money he can get his legion of feckless followers to donate. If there was any single part of him that wanted to make sure they were convicted he wouldn't have done what he did. But the views and clicks and extra donations he got made it worth it.

And he didn't have any part in getting the gang caught as he only got involved when the police had done their work as he saw a bandwagon that needed jumping on.

He's a paedophile defender at worst (well, he defended a convicted paedopjile and campaigned for his release). A paedophile ignorer at best.
 


Than I was asked for link to so I gave one. Isn't that what we're supposed to do?

Edited by josephbloggs
  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, josephbloggs said:

 True to form, refuses to read or acknowledge anything that contradicts your view. Understood.

Waste of time engaging with you, I don't know why I keep coming back.

I can answer that for you.

You keep coming back because narcissists always have to have the last word.

Posted
6 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

 True to form, refuses to read or acknowledge anything that contradicts your view. Understood.

Waste of time engaging with you, I don't know why I keep coming back.

Because you have too...........😉

Posted
26 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

Isn't that a bit shortaphobic?

As the nurse said to me when I had my last vaccination: 'just a short prick Sir' . 

 

It was a statement, not a question,  I hope !

Posted

Tommy has a thuggish past, but he is motivated the same concerns that Christopher Hitchens had.  "Resist it while you still can, before the right to complain is taken away from you." 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Crossy said:

My first thought was "excellent movie and soundtrack". Maybe I'm showing my age!

 

My second thought was "Tommy who?" :whistling:

 

Clever. Cousin Kevin would be proud.😉

Posted
13 minutes ago, Gandtee said:

It's not a kerfuffle about Tommy. It's about a two tier justice system and the British way of life and culture being taken over by the followers of Islam. Some who are attempting to bring their rule and way of life into the country. There is also fear of them trying to introduce sharia law. The Gay community would love that. The unabated influx of illegal immigrants is overwhelming the British social structure and amenities. Successive governments have done little to curb it.         I'm no fan of Tommy Robinson and have always considered him a flash little bastard. But he is representing the British population who feel they and their country is under threat. Britain is an island. It can only accommodate so many. Strength to his elbow.               

Do you have any evidence of this nonsense?  Thought not.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
Posted
1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Do you have any evidence of this nonsense?  Thought not.

You ask a question, then dismiss any answer..........

Are you non-British...?  :ermm:

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, ChumpChange said:

Tommy the nonce. 

And a nonce apologist.

But please we should call him by his name, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. He changed it because it sounded posh and non "geezer of the people" which is the image he wanted to cultivate. Can you imagine a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon inspiring the far right? Sounds a bit posh and forrin', innit.

Edited by josephbloggs
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...