Jump to content

Is NATO Ready for War? An In-Depth Assessment of Defense and Deterrence


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, tandor said:

..but aren't the 'ancients' going to intervene and put out the lit fuses!

 

the ancients can't get the gate on destiny working yet. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

You can take the numbers in this article with a very LARGE grain of salt. Germany, for example, actually has only about 100 battle ready tanks (Leopards). France, perhaps 200. Italy, as few as 50 that are operational.  Their air forces are in similar states. They have very little in the way of lift capability or force projection.

 

NATO members have been starving their militaries for decades. And it is now showing.  They have been relying on Uncle Sugar for too long.

 

You might do well to add Poland to your in depth study.

 

They have been expanding their military considerably  recently in preparation for any Russian aggression. Last I read they have over 600 tanks plus additional armored vehicles. 

 

Secondly , let us look at moral. We can see how enthusiastic the average Russian male is about an expansion of the war by the numbers of them that have fled the country rather than fight. If Russia attacks Nato their troops will not be as motivated as the defenders.

 

Therefore a dangerous situation will quickly arise whereby Putin will have to go nuclear as a last resort to save his sorry ass . Not a good outcome for the planet. It all depends on whether there is anyone in Russia capable of removing Putin before he cuts of everyone's nose to spite his face.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

You can take the numbers in this article with a very LARGE grain of salt. Germany, for example, actually has only about 100 battle ready tanks (Leopards). France, perhaps 200. Italy, as few as 50 that are operational.  Their air forces are in similar states. They have very little in the way of lift capability or force projection.

 

NATO members have been starving their militaries for decades. And it is now showing.  They have been relying on Uncle Sugar for too long.

This is why European Nato countries should have increased VAT by 3% at least to Finance the war effort. And this as soon as Russia crossed the Ukrainian border. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Woof999 said:

 

Quit with this "no wars under Trump" bullcrap.

 

1.) He buddy's up to Putin. Do you think that Putin in any way, shape or form either admires or fears Trump? He WANTS Trump in office.

 

2.) He has already told Putin to "do whatever the hell he likes" with any country he feels are "delinquent" on their defence spending. Is that what a peace lover does?

 

3.) No new wars may have started on foreign soil during his presidency (do you honestly think that was because of any proactive work done by Trump?), but he riles up his fellow nationals domestically. Such as "stand by" for the Proud Boys, and numerous others and stood by doing nothing while his followers marched on the Capitol, being fed a whole heap of lies about a "stolen election".

 

Bless you anyway.

 

Oh No  another W with trailing digits.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, stoner said:

 

a thread is not a thread without the first comment being a tug talking points rant. i expect it to be the first on anything don.

 

I think he has an in.

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Tug said:

The felons behavior and statements towards nato and his being an asset to the Russian federation is entirely relevant to the thread just what the dude says is enough evidence for any rational person who cherishes democracy and freedom he needs to be called out.furthermore to even suggest that NATO and her ALLIES don’t have the long range capability is laughable.it’s easy to deduce were your sympathy's lie…..

A lovely sentiment. Except the small detail that Ukraine really isn't the poster child for "democracy and freedom" now, is it? Never has been, even before the Russian invasion. At best, ranked as "partly free" by Freedom House.

 

Any long range capability that NATO has relies almost exclusively on the USAF. 

 

It isn't a question of sympathy, that is just an easy dodge to avoid reality. Much like the good old shibboleth of "you must be a Putin puppet" if a person is not 100% on board with starting a global war to eject Russia from Ukraine. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
10 hours ago, johng said:

Do not underestimate Russia  they have the nukes too !

 

Yeah but will they work ? Come to think of it, will ours work ? 🤔

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, TedG said:

The West can beat Russia. Russian can't even handle Ukraine. 

That's true.

But the west isn't helping Ukraine enough to actually win.

It still isn't.

Just enough to not lose and the eight month delay from the Putin adjacent U.S. maga fascists saw Ukraine on a losing slide.

So to me it's not about capability (yes the west has it) but political will and patience. Russia historically is into very long wars. The west particularly Americans have five minute attention spans.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

The Donald told them to get their <deleted> together years ago, and they laughed. Well, who's laughing now? Germany spending 1.4% of GDP on defence is a sad joke, the rest of NATO not much better. They are reaping what they have sown. You think Putin would have invaded in 2022 if NATO had provided any kind of credible military response capability? Doubt it.

 

One would really think the world really does not need a Germany that takes re-arming itself serious.

 

Germans are goal-oriented. If there is an armed military, sooner or later the populace will ask why that much money was spent if it is then not "used". Already there is a serious problem with right-leaning rhetoric, but few tools to act on it on a world stage.

 

I wish that Germany stays as it is: it pays for everybodies armaments, but keeps out of the business of having them itself.

 

And I say that, being German.

Edited by jts-khorat
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

A lovely sentiment. Except the small detail that Ukraine really isn't the poster child for "democracy and freedom" now, is it? Never has been, even before the Russian invasion. At best, ranked as "partly free" by Freedom House.

 

Any long range capability that NATO has relies almost exclusively on the USAF. 

 

It isn't a question of sympathy, that is just an easy dodge to avoid reality. Much like the good old shibboleth of "you must be a Putin puppet" if a person is not 100% on board with starting a global war to eject Russia from Ukraine. 

Nor is the USA the United Kingdom France or any democracy…..nor was japan or Germany in the 40s look at them now not perfect but much much better and they are thriving .Ukraine doesn’t even compare to the heinous regimes that those 2 examples were in the past,they are a work in progress and far better than Russia under Putin.I don’t know the weapons systems of the nato nations but I suspect some do have very long range hyper accurate weapons systems.we here in the USA certainly do we are a nato member.Im sure glad our leaders didn’t think like you during ww2 and let England have to capitulate to the Nazi……salva Ukraine 🇺🇦 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Tug said:

Nor is the USA the United Kingdom France or any democracy…..nor was japan or Germany in the 40s look at them now not perfect but much much better and they are thriving .Ukraine doesn’t even compare to the heinous regimes that those 2 examples were in the past,they are a work in progress and far better than Russia under Putin.I don’t know the weapons systems of the nato nations but I suspect some do have very long range hyper accurate weapons systems.we here in the USA certainly do we are a nato member.Im sure glad our leaders didn’t think like you during ww2 and let England have to capitulate to the Nazi……salva Ukraine 🇺🇦 

Ludicrous comparisons abound- England vs. Germany in 1940 as comparable to Ukraine today? Don't make me laugh.  There is no world war happening now, and god willing one won't break out. Ukraine isn't worth the life of one Canadian soldier IMHO, especially since getting involved would provoke a global war. Ain't worth that either. 

 

At the moment it is all about posturing and chest puffing, not about actual policy and searching for solutions. 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
11 hours ago, jvs said:

I know a lot of people are saying sanctions do not work and the russian economy is doing really well!

Absolute bovine feces!

Russia is slowly falling apart from the inside out,no maintenance,no parts,Gazprom in trouble,the ruble is falling.The list goes on and on,people are being picked up in nightclubs and send straight to the front,to die!

 

There was a recent quote by John Mearsheimer about Lindsey Graham. “He and I live on different planets.”

 

Welcome to the forum, Lindsey.

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 2
Posted
17 hours ago, TedG said:

The West can beat Russia. Russian can't even handle Ukraine. 

To be honest The politicians are willing to replicate what Hamas has subjected Gazian inhabitants to  being human shields imop!

 

I remember the cold war and having air raid drills in school, while having to cower under the classroom desk.

It just takes one bomb , one crazy mis step.

 

I remember being 90 miles away from Cuba missiles and fleeing

in panic while we vacationed in Miami.

 

Childhood Memories Of The Cuban Missile Crisis

https://www.npr.org/2012/10/22/163395079/childhood-memories-of-the-cuban-missile-crisis

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 6/21/2024 at 10:21 AM, Denim said:

 

You might do well to add Poland to your in depth study.

 

They have been expanding their military considerably  recently in preparation for any Russian aggression. Last I read they have over 600 tanks plus additional armored vehicles. 

 

Secondly , let us look at moral. We can see how enthusiastic the average Russian male is about an expansion of the war by the numbers of them that have fled the country rather than fight. If Russia attacks Nato their troops will not be as motivated as the defenders.

 

Therefore a dangerous situation will quickly arise whereby Putin will have to go nuclear as a last resort to save his sorry ass . Not a good outcome for the planet. It all depends on whether there is anyone in Russia capable of removing Putin before he cuts of everyone's nose to spite his face.

 

Trump was instrumental in helping Poland do this. They were even going to name a base after him. Plland has always been a very strong Poland first type of place they have been effed with a lot. I lived there for nearly a decade. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...