Jump to content

Biden Withdraws from Re-Election, Endorses Harris in a Pivotal Shift for the 2024 Race


Social Media

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

clowns are like buses...none for ages, then 2 come along at the same time!

A shame you get run over when you try to debate them....

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

I don't like wasting words. Your entire effort was insulting, childish and pathetic.

Historically, your logorrheic tendencies on these forums would indicate otherwise, and rather than offer anything constructive, (or being unable to), you often elect to proffer responses that you hope come across as witty or mocking, (they don't).
Hence, if you are not able to engage in anything other than that already stated, I have no desire to waste my time with you.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, tilaceer said:

Historically, your logorrheic tendencies on these forums would indicate otherwise, and rather than offer anything constructive, (or being unable to), you often elect to proffer responses that you hope come across as witty or mocking, (they don't).
Hence, if you are not able to engage in anything other than that already stated, I have no desire to waste my time with you.

 

Logorreic? Is that your word of the day? Well done.

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, xylophone said:

image.png.3ca9c1fecece872d9828f4bbe363a7d3.png

 

You really think that a bullet like this will cause a little graze????

Ya'll really don't know anything about guns and ammo do you?  Do you know the difference between a 22 and a 5.56x45mm or the Remington .223?  Big scary bullets huh?  But the 22 has a .223" diameter bullet.  That big scary looking 5.56x45mm that the dead would-be-assassin fired at Trump?  It has a .224" diameter bullet.  Yeah - a whole scary 0.001" difference.  I mean, these would only cause "a little graze" right. 

22_Short-1513056357.thumb.jpg.85f65a9927e6b59ee5c2720c7c88696c.jpg
The primary difference is the muzzle volatility, muzzle energy, and the weight of the bullet with a 22-LR about half the weight as the 5.56x45mm which is similar to a Remington .223 which are fired out of an AR-15.  But as far as bullet size?  They are essentially the same diameter kids. 
Lead_AR-15-223-vs-556-8-0411.jpg.f4fae15d7ed96fca28b350693df8f3c5.jpg

 

:angry: "But it's a big scary bullet and the 22 is a little bullet!"

😎 No - a .338 Lapua is a "big scary bullet."  So is the (probably) .308 that the USSS sniper took the kid out with.  Really scary.  However, any of the above will turn your brains into "pink mist." 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lacessit said:

A shame you get run over when you try to debate them....

yeah right.  certain ones i've come across just repeat themselves, even after being proved wrong. like they cannot retract or admit..but most of us here see them for what they are, gobby red nosed bell**ds

Edited by frank83628
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

It has been 'weekend at Bernie's'  for over 2 years mate  

he got told to drop out after the disastrous debate by those in charge, just like Bernie did in 2016, remember that bruise on his face, and after 30+ years campaigning about the same issues, in the blink of an eye he switches, endorses clinton. if anyone thinks biden was calling the shots you are gullible to say the least..

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

I, for one, do not care about a Biden Endorsement for Harris.

 

In my view, this is just Sour Grapes.

 

You see, Biden realizes, full well, that the Salad Woman is a disaster.

 

Therefore, before withdrawing from the election, he Formally Endorsed the Salad Woman as his final act of Retribution.

 

"If I can't run for Prez in 2024, then Nobody will!" he said.

 

Yes, the Salad Woman is the Nobody who will run in 2024.

Trump will be Re-Elected....

And, Everybody will live happily, ever after. 

 

So, it's Nobody against Everybody, it seems.

And, Everybody despises Nobody, too.

 

 

 

 

What the hell is this about ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connda said:

Ya'll really don't know anything about guns

 

What language is "Ya'll".....ah another one of trumps favourite people as he likes the poorly educated.

 

Don't worry as there are plenty of rednecks, Proud Boys and goobers willing to shoot another president or high ranking official as is the way in the "good ole" US of A! And this shooter was a Republican, well, well.

 

I went to a rock concert in London a few decades ago and at the end of a fast paced version of "America" the following words were sung by a young boy.. America is pregnant with promise and anticipation, but is murdered by the hand of the inevitable. Make of it what you will, but it has echoes of the truth in it.

Edited by xylophone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rabas said:

 

Yes. Proven by physics. To blow something up, a bullet must dump a lot of energy into it by slowing down. A small piece of soft tissue can't slow it down enough.

 

Anyway, moot point.

Fact-checking the shattering teleprompter conspiracy theory at Trump rally
Fact Check: Hit with A Bullet: Glass from Teleprompter Did Not Injure Trump

 

If you don't trust fact checkers: There was no shattered teleprompter. Teleprompters were far forward of the microphone and out of the shooter's line of site,  and the bullet was photographed passing directly behind Trump's head as he turned right.


image.png.eda124784c0ea3244f5a64291fc6153a.png

[LINK]

lol that could be a vapour trail from a jet passing overhead. Hands up can you see a bullet clearly ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connda said:

Ya'll really don't know anything about guns and ammo do you?  Do you know the difference between a 22 and a 5.56x45mm or the Remington .223?  Big scary bullets huh?  But the 22 has a .223" diameter bullet.  That big scary looking 5.56x45mm that the dead would-be-assassin fired at Trump?  It has a .224" diameter bullet.  Yeah - a whole scary 0.001" difference.  I mean, these would only cause "a little graze" right. 

22_Short-1513056357.thumb.jpg.85f65a9927e6b59ee5c2720c7c88696c.jpg
The primary difference is the muzzle volatility, muzzle energy, and the weight of the bullet with a 22-LR about half the weight as the 5.56x45mm which is similar to a Remington .223 which are fired out of an AR-15.  But as far as bullet size?  They are essentially the same diameter kids. 
Lead_AR-15-223-vs-556-8-0411.jpg.f4fae15d7ed96fca28b350693df8f3c5.jpg

 

:angry: "But it's a big scary bullet and the 22 is a little bullet!"

😎 No - a .338 Lapua is a "big scary bullet."  So is the (probably) .308 that the USSS sniper took the kid out with.  Really scary.  However, any of the above will turn your brains into "pink mist." 

 

 

It is important to note that the kinetic energy of a projectile, such as you have imaged here, is proportional to the SQUARE of the velocity of the projectile.

This is key.

The bullet that grazed Trump's ear was travelling at about 3000 fps.

This is far faster than one of those .22 LR cartridges that you also imaged.

And then, since the energy is rises with the SQUARE of the the velocity, this is why the AR15 is so dangerous and lethal.

image.png.5859daf03ff09bcfb088af52f1e9e407.png

 

image.png.480013c936443dd468191b2f31abba57.png

This is why I would have chosen the 460 Weatherby Magnum, if I were hunting an elephant.

 

image.png.0f4d2413e7e2dbfb8df1e0c102298d20.png

 

https://cdn.revolutionise.com.au/cups/ssaa/files/iqz0jttps0xnohgs.pdf

 

When I was young, I had several books with ballistics tables.

These days, you can find much more info just by clicking on your keyboard, if connected to the net.

Very convenient, the internet.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tilaceer said:

Historically, your logorrheic tendencies on these forums would indicate otherwise, and rather than offer anything constructive, (or being unable to), you often elect to proffer responses that you hope come across as witty or mocking, (they don't).
Hence, if you are not able to engage in anything other than that already stated, I have no desire to waste my time with you.

what's a " proffer " and logorrheic ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, pedro01 said:

So... errrr. where is Joe?

 

he is behind the scenes dependably engaged on taking care of business on behalf of all of the American people. You should see that guy move. I am beginning to wonder if he is in a coma or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, frank83628 said:

yeah right.  certain ones i've come across just repeat themselves, even after being proved wrong. like they cannot retract or admit..but most of us here see them for what they are, gobby red nosed bell**ds

I still don't know what a bell**d is, so your attempted insult is an exercise in futility. Again.

 

The significance of a red nose escapes me. Having said that, I am sure it is preferable to brown - nosing Trump.

 

Checking the number of posts you've made on this thread. you do quite well in the gobby stakes yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, xylophone said:

You mean the Democracy that his supporters, at his urging, tried to destroy......that Democracy. 

 

Stop drinking the Kool Aid and watching Faux Fox News it is not good for you, petal.

 

More lefty conspiracy theories.😃

 

You've tried to jail him and tried to shoot him. Failed at both. The left are specialists in failure.  

 

Stop watching CNN and reading The Guardian, sweetypie.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

More lefty conspiracy theories.😃

 

You've tried to jail him and tried to shoot him. Failed at both. The left are specialists in failure.  

 

Stop watching CNN and reading The Guardian, sweetypie.  

Criminals being indicted, prosecuted and sentenced to prison is nothing new.

 

Although you yourself might be more used to members of certain social strata being above the law, NY’s successful prosecution of Trump is an affirmation that in the U.S. nobody is above the law.

 


 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Criminals being indicted, prosecuted and sentenced to prison is nothing new.

 

It is for ex-Presidents.

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

Although you yourself might be more used to members of certain social strata being above the law, NY’s successful prosecution of Trump is an affirmation that in the U.S. nobody is above the law.

 


 

 

 

As crooked Joe will find out post November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

It is for ex-Presidents.

 

 

As crooked Joe will find out post November.


Trump was convicted, in his first criminal trial,  for crimes he committed before he was PresidenT on the basis of documents and testimony from his own businesses, his own associates and people he himself employed.

 

The evidence against him came entirely from ‘Trump world’.

 

Trump’s criminal conviction was indeed the first against a former President of the U.S., just one more point of shame in his sordid life. 
It won’t be he last conviction.

 

There will be no prosecution of Biden as he hasn’t committed any crimes.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

More lefty conspiracy theories.😃

 

You've tried to jail him and tried to shoot him. Failed at both. The left are specialists in failure.  

 

Stop watching CNN and reading The Guardian, sweetypie.  

Please share with the us a credible link showing that "leftists" tried to shoot him. Actually, the loon who did manage to shoot Trump also was found to have done extensive research on Biden as well.

 

Failed assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks researched Trump and Biden, and even a UK royal, before shooting

Investigators detailed Crooks’ search history to lawmakers on Wednesday, sharing how the 20-year-old searched for the dates of Trump’s appearances and the Democratic National Convention — and also looked up info to help his own “major depressive disorder,” people on the call told the New York Times.

The gunman also had images of Trump and Biden saved to his cellphone, law enforcement sources previously told The Post....

Crooks’ search history revealed a broad interest in high-profile people and celebrities, regardless of their political affiliation, FBI officials reportedly said — further hindering their hunt for a motive.

https://nypost.com/2024/07/18/us-news/thomas-crooks-researched-trump-and-biden-and-a-uk-royal/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""