Jump to content

How do Filipinas Differ from Thai Women?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I wouldn't want my sexual stimulation halved, but if that isn't an issue for you, then great.

 

Anyone can be circumcised if they want, but I don't think it's a good idea to lie about it.

Not halved. Proven false. You got no idea.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Half the pleasure is lost when you have part of your penis removed.

 

5 minutes ago, susanlea said:

False claims.

OK then how much pleasure do you think is lost?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

I wouldn't want my sexual stimulation halved, but if that isn't an issue for you, then great.

If it's so great why are so many men on ED drugs? you take viagra/kamagra etc? i doubt you'd admit it anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

OK then how much pleasure do you think is lost?

Same question to you, If it's so great why are so many men on ED drugs? you take viagra/kamagra etc? i doubt you'd admit it anyway

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Not ideal as an adult, hard for some men to cope with

about 2 weeks of pain and few more some itching. Moses did it with sharp stones onto himself and every men he could catch nearby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Anyone can be circumcised if they want, but I don't think it's a good idea to lie about it.

I agree so stop lying and apologise for it. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, susanlea said:

The consensus of the highest quality literature is that MC has minimal or no adverse effect, and in some studies, it has benefits on sexual functions, sensation, satisfaction, and pleasure for males circumcised neonatally or in adulthood.

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2050116120301240

 

Sounds a little broad and unconclusive.  Try these:

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1607551X13002684

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/male-circumcision-tied-to-less-sexual-pleasure-idUSBRE91D1CP/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

From your link

 

"For example, uncircumcised men reported an average sensitivity score of 3.72 when they or their partner stroked the top part of their penis's glans, compared to 3.31 amongst circumcised men."

 

Where did you get half from?

 

you are a liar.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Same question to you, If it's so great why are so many men on ED drugs?

 

If foreskin is great, why are men on ED drugs?  I'm not sure what that even means.

 

8 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

you take viagra/kamagra etc? i doubt you'd admit it anyway

 

What does that have to do with foreskin?  Isn't that the opposite problem to ED?

 

I'm not sure what points you're trying to make.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

If foreskin is great, why are men on ED drugs?  I'm not sure what that even means.

 

 

What does that have to do with foreskin?  Isn't that the opposite problem to ED?

 

I'm not sure what points you're trying to make.

Might be linked to brain function as well.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, susanlea said:

Read the science. 

There is no "science", Its just rubbish made up (after the event of course)  purely for the purposes of justifying mutilation and appeasing the ignorant barbarians who support the practice .  It also helps the victims , like you, feel less like they are missing out on certain aspects of sexual pleasure. It was probably intended to be part of the healing process, or rather as near as possible to the healing process, as healing is impossible

Did a scientific study precede the onset of circumcision ?  Of course not  so to suggest any scientific basis for  circumcision , is clearly nothing other than your personal twisted fantasy 

           There are similar positive reports on the benefits of cutting women too (produced specifically to keep the muzzers happy) What are your "educated" views on FGM I wonder  What does "the science" tell you about that ?  Does it really remove the fishy odour?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

From the part of the penis being removed.  🙄

 

The glans aren't removed.

 

You're the liar here.

50% :cheesy:

 

Your link showed 11%

 

Embarrassing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

If foreskin is great, why are men on ED drugs?  I'm not sure what that even means.

 

 

What does that have to do with foreskin?  Isn't that the opposite problem to ED?

 

I'm not sure what points you're trying to make.

Simple isn't it, you are saying foreskin has more sensitivity so getting and maintaining an erection should be easier, but so many men in Thailand use ED drugs, understand now? you use them?

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bday Prang said:

There is no "science", Its just rubbish made up (after the event of course)  purely for the purposes of justifying mutilation and appeasing the ignorant barbarians who support the practice .  It also helps the victims , like you, feel less like they are missing out on certain aspects of sexual pleasure. It was probably intended to be part of the healing process, or rather as near as possible to the healing process, as healing is impossible

Did a scientific study precede the onset of circumcision ?  Of course not  so to suggest any scientific basis for  circumcision , is clearly nothing other than your personal twisted fantasy 

           There are similar positive reports on the benefits of cutting women too (produced specifically to keep the muzzers happy) What are your "educated" views on FGM I wonder  What does "the science" tell you about that ?  Does it really remove the fishy odour?

Gibberish. Most men and women prefer circumsized. 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, susanlea said:

50% :cheesy:

 

Your link showed 11%

 

Embarrassing

 

Were they testing the part that was removed?  How would you even do that?  The studies appear to be flawed.

 

Embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

There is no "science", Its just rubbish made up (after the event of course)  purely for the purposes of justifying mutilation and appeasing the ignorant barbarians who support the practice .  It also helps the victims , like you, feel less like they are missing out on certain aspects of sexual pleasure. It was probably intended to be part of the healing process, or rather as near as possible to the healing process, as healing is impossible

Did a scientific study precede the onset of circumcision ?  Of course not  so to suggest any scientific basis for  circumcision , is clearly nothing other than your personal twisted fantasy 

           There are similar positive reports on the benefits of cutting women too (produced specifically to keep the muzzers happy) What are your "educated" views on FGM I wonder  What does "the science" tell you about that ?  Does it really remove the fishy odour?

 
Cutting women or men when nature provides them with adequate tools seems brutal to me. But it's freedom of choice unless you are the subject of brutal religious rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scubascuba3 said:

Simple isn't it, you are saying foreskin has more sensitivity so getting and maintaining an erection should be easier

 

That seems like an odd leap to make.  Why should that be so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Simple isn't it, you are saying foreskin has more sensitivity so getting and maintaining an erection should be easier, but so many men in Thailand use ED drugs, understand now? you use them?

Too funny. Mr sensitive cant get it up.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, susanlea said:

Gibberish. Most men and women prefer circumsized. 

 Data? Links? How can you say that? In all my decades of happy travelling, no woman has mentioned it. No problem if a guy wants to do that, but it's not natural - obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Were they testing the part that was removed?  How would you even do that?  The studies appear to be flawed.

 

Embarrassing.

You falsely claimed 50% with no proof. Then your link says 11%. Now you say studies are flawed. You are a fool. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BobBKK said:

 Data? Links? How can you say that? In all my decades of happy travelling, no woman has mentioned it. No problem if a guy wants to do that, but it's not natural - obviously.

Links above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""