Just now, Roo Island said:

Guaranteed she's smarter than you or I.

Or Trump

18 minutes ago, Phulublub said:

In exactly the same way, I could say I think you are a complete idiot.  That statement does not make you one.

In the case of the person that you are referring to, I think I would have to argue that it totally does. 

6 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Agree.....it is pretty obvious now that the Trump team are bricking it and desperate for an out.....

 

If they can find an out (no muting of mics?) .........AND make it look like it is the Dems that are at fault........ it will be a win-win for Trump?

Trump's team are probably working on a way of muting Kamala's mic the entire time. 😂 

 

Meanwhile, Fox News have already agreed to it. 

9 hours ago, 123Stodg said:

If he shows up. 

Kamala could just debate an empty chair. IMO she'd like that- her sort of debate.

 

If it's true it's a good thing for Trump as win or lose the debate he'll always be the loser to the loudest in the room.

 

IMO he has nothing to gain by debating. Better off having a big rally same time.

Derogatory name calling troll posts have been removed.

17 minutes ago, TDCNINJA said:

I hope Trump wins for no other reason than to see all of the woke, Marxist, nanny state radicals lose their collective minds

The chances of that happening are slim and none and slim just left town. 

Why is so hard to talk about both of these candidates with out using pejorative terms? Does using pejoratives make the writer feel they are smarter or by using them think they are doing anything constructive? Do they think that by name calling we will think less of the candidate they are trying put down? In MHO it makes the writer look petty and childish and diminishes their statement.

2 hours ago, maesariang said:

Debates with teleprompters?

No such thing exists. 

1 hour ago, proton said:

having the option to laugh, cackle and talk gobble de gook the entire time 

Sounds just like all of your posts. 

7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Kamala could just debate an empty chair. IMO she'd like that- her sort of debate.

She already said that if Trump doesn't show up (for the already scheduled debate) that she will still appear at the scheduled debate and it will turned into a town hall. That means it won't be a debate against an empty chair. 

8 minutes ago, Chwooly said:

Why is so hard to talk about both of these candidates with out using pejorative terms? Does using pejoratives make the writer feel they are smarter or by using them think they are doing anything constructive? Do they think that by name calling we will think less of the candidate they are trying put down? In MHO it makes the writer look petty and childish and diminishes their statement.

You're correct.  Also look at which candidate has a history of name-calling and using derogatory terms to describe others.

2 hours ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

 

Do you think it is a good thing that Trump doesn't read?

unable to read*

Just now, 123Stodg said:

unable to read*

Perhaps he has had a stroke or developed some other neurological condition that impairs his ability to read. He's old, you know.

3 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

You're correct.  Also look at which candidate has a history of name-calling and using derogatory terms to describe others.

I am not talking about the candidates themselves, Last I checked neither of them post here, But their supporters do and that is why I am talking about, Please keep the whataboutisms to a minimum. 

9 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Better off having a big rally same time.

The days of Trump having a big rally are long gone.
He is lucky to average 5k to 5.5k for at least 28 of the 37 rallies he has had this year.
Video footage shows half full stadiums as well as many leaving during his blethering.
Very little incentive to go as it is always the same schtick, (me, me, me).
Guess its always a good opportunity to pick up either a diaper t-shirt, or a sanitary product ear warmer, as a souvenir.
 

2 minutes ago, Chwooly said:

I am not talking about the candidates themselves, Last I checked neither of them post here, But their supporters do and that is why I am talking about, Please keep the whataboutisms to a minimum. 

So it is OK for the candidates to engage in petty name calling, but not for writers here?

 

Slightly odd thought, that!

 

PH

4 hours ago, maesariang said:

60yo woman wants the top job

She's 59. But so does the 78 year-old elderly, geriatric man. 😂

25 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Kamala could just debate an empty chair. IMO she'd like that- her sort of debate.

 

If it's true it's a good thing for Trump as win or lose the debate he'll always be the loser to the loudest in the room.

 

IMO he has nothing to gain by debating. Better off having a big rally same time.

Debates can cut both ways. Kamala won AG due to a bad debate by her opponent, who was leading. Look at Biden's. Definitely risky.

4 hours ago, novacova said:

What a freaking joke of a lying conflagration of misinformed facts. He did not pull out of the debate, he threatened to pull out.

Trying to put it in, then pulling out, then trying to put it in again, then pulling out again. Story of his life. Never puts in, only pulls out.  

43 minutes ago, TDCNINJA said:

I hope Trump wins for no other reason than to see all of the woke, Marxist, nanny state radicals lose their collective minds

You seem to have used most of the weaponized, childish terms used by the far right.

16 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

You're correct.  Also look at which candidate has a history of name-calling and using derogatory terms to describe others.

Along with all of his followers.

3 hours ago, maesariang said:

She has zero speaking skills. That's why she is dodging debates. A strong debater would agree to 3 debates. Gabbard showed her up in 2019. 

 

Grasping, grasping at straws... "Oh, hello Tulsi! How are you girl, where are you now, where've you been?"

 

 

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

2 hours ago, proton said:

 

More like Harris having the option to laugh, cackle and talk gobble de gook the entire time 

 

While Trump having the option to wiggle out from under one of her big toes (no need to use the whole foot). Go Kamala, aka GOP-Zilla 2024 !!!

51 minutes ago, TDCNINJA said:

I hope Trump wins for no other reason than to see all of the woke, Marxist, nanny state radicals lose their collective minds

I hope Harris wins so all the MAGA supporters crawl back under the rocks they came from.

 

No need to worry about them losing their minds, that ship sailed long ago.

He has a habit of breaking interview agreements.

 

 

“The White House’s unprecedented decision to disregard their agreement with CBS News and release their footage will not deter 60 Minutes from providing its full, fair and contextual reporting which presidents have participated in for decades,” the network said in a statement.

In a 30-minute interview with Mr Trump, the president grew combative and restless with Ms Stahl, who calmly pressed him on several subjects while he accused her of not being “fair" before he abruptly ended the interview.

1 minute ago, Roo Island said:

He has a habit of breaking interview agreements.

 

 

“The White House’s unprecedented decision to disregard their agreement with CBS News and release their footage will not deter 60 Minutes from providing its full, fair and contextual reporting which presidents have participated in for decades,” the network said in a statement.

In a 30-minute interview with Mr Trump, the president grew combative and restless with Ms Stahl, who calmly pressed him on several subjects while he accused her of not being “fair" before he abruptly ended the interview.

 

Petulant child.

3 hours ago, frank83628 said:

i think the OP and a few AN members here are the obsessed ones.

Trump is the only obsessed one here and his sad obsession is always losing or he wouldn't be running again against a member of the same administration that already beat him in 2020.
 

Some people never learn their lesson and have to keep learning the same lesson over and over again. 
 

He's already lost multiple legal battles, businesses, marriages, licensing deals and he's soon to lose multiple elections too. 

40 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Kamala could just debate an empty chair. IMO she'd like that- her sort of debate.

 

If it's true it's a good thing for Trump as win or lose the debate he'll always be the loser to the loudest in the room.

 

IMO he has nothing to gain by debating. Better off having a big rally same time.

Agree, he has everything to lose when Harris takes a forensic scalpel to his lies.

 

Difficult to have a big rally at the same time when the venues are less than half full, more leaving as he gets into his stolen election shtick.

 

As I understand it, cities are becoming increasingly reluctant to have his rallies, due to the trail of unpaid bills he is leaving behind. He owes El Paso half a million dollars.

1 minute ago, 123Stodg said:

Trump is the only obsessed one here and his sad obsession is always losing or he wouldn't be running again against a member of the same administration that already beat him in 2020.
 

Some people never learn their lesson and have to keep learning the same lesson over and over again. 
 

He's already lost multiple legal battles, businesses, marriages, licensing deals and he's soon to lose multiple elections too. 

 

He's already lost the popular vote in two presidential elections. He's now going for the trifecta.