Do they sell Arcalyst here?

[zeekgarcia]

Arcalyst injection for pericarditis. Inflammation around the sack holding the heart.

Or what do they use for pericarditis here?

 

Thanks

[Sheryl]

Arcalyst is not available hrre.

 

Treatment options vary with cause (e.g. infectious vs noninfectious). May include NSAIDs, colchicine,  steroids.

 

Have you been diagnosed with this? 

 

 

[Jaggg88]

Pericarditis is quite hard to diagnose. As Cheryl says the standard treatment is Naproxen and colchicine. The cause can be viral or bacterial; it is also a common side effect of mRNA vaccines which can also cause Myocarditis

[Lorry]

2 hours ago, Jaggg88 said:

it is also a common side effect of mRNA vaccines which can also cause Myocarditis

If you call 0.15% very common...

I have some lottery tickets I would like to sell you. 

 

BTW bacterial pericarditis is rare and very different from what is discussed in this thread

[Jaggg88]

21 hours ago, Lorry said:

If you call 0.15% very common...

I have some lottery tickets I would like to sell you. 

 

BTW bacterial pericarditis is rare and very different from what is discussed in this thread

Most events go unrecorded so your quote of 0.15% is unrealistic.

RFK Jr. wrote in his post, “Five states — Texas, Utah, Kansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana — suing Pfizer for knowing and concealing the vaccine causing myocarditis, pericarditis, failed pregnancies and deaths. That’s 10% of US states.”

[Sheryl]

14 hours ago, Jaggg88 said:

Most events go unrecorded so your quote of 0.15% is unrealistic.

RFK Jr. wrote in his post, “Five states — Texas, Utah, Kansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana — suing Pfizer for knowing and concealing the vaccine causing myocarditis, pericarditis, failed pregnancies and deaths. That’s 10% of US states.”

Percent of states where a lawsuit has been filed has nothing whatsoevet to do with the percent of people vaccinated who develop myocarditis. It is very  very low. Which is why the connection was not apparent until the post marketing phase. 

[Jaggg88]

On 9/19/2024 at 11:01 AM, Sheryl said:

Percent of states where a lawsuit has been filed has nothing whatsoevet to do with the percent of people vaccinated who develop myocarditis. It is very  very low. Which is why the connection was not apparent until the post marketing phase. 

Your quote is now out of step with the known data. Serious adverse effects from the experimental mRNA vaccines was grossly underreported.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

[Jaggg88]

On 9/17/2024 at 11:14 PM, Lorry said:

If you call 0.15% very common...

I have some lottery tickets I would like to sell you. 

 

BTW bacterial pericarditis is rare and very different from what is discussed in this thread

Serious adverse effects were grossly underreported the experimental mRNA vaccines and the true data is in this link

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

 

 

[Sheryl]

1 hour ago, Jaggg88 said:

Serious adverse effects were grossly underreported the experimental mRNA vaccines and the true data is in this link

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

 

 

On the contrary this  link reports post marketing data neely available for the first time. Not underrreported data fom vaccine trials.

 

In addition  it indicates similar risk of myocarditis with both conventional and mRNA vacvines.

 

Lsstly, the incidence if all adverse effects mentioned id extremely low.  Which is why it has taken a sample size of tens of  milliions to measure. 

 

[Sheryl]

1 hour ago, Jaggg88 said:

Your quote is now out of step with the known data. Serious adverse effects from the experimental mRNA vaccines was grossly underreported.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

See above

 

Not at all what this link says.