Jump to content

Harris-Walz Campaign Opts for Media Silence as Election Nears


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

The Harris-Walz campaign is on track to set a new precedent in modern U.S. politics by engaging in fewer interviews and press conferences than any other major party presidential ticket. This approach, characterized by limited media interaction, has raised questions about their strategy, especially as many voters express a desire to know more about Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.

 

Despite the significance of this election cycle and the sudden withdrawal of President Biden from the race on July 21, Harris and Walz have avoided the media spotlight. Harris, a candidate for 59 days, and Walz, for 44 days, have held only a handful of interviews in contrast to their Republican counterparts, Donald Trump and JD Vance. Trump and Vance have taken part in over 70 interviews and press conferences during the same period, whereas Harris and Walz have participated in just seven, according to an analysis by Axios.

 

While Trump and Vance's media appearances have included interviews with both local TV stations and national outlets, Harris and Walz have stayed largely out of sight. For instance, in local TV interviews since July 21, Trump has done seven, Vance 15, while Harris and Walz have only managed one and three, respectively. In terms of national TV interviews, Vance alone has taken part in 24, compared to Harris and Walz’s one each. Moreover, neither Harris nor Walz have held a single press conference, a stark contrast to Trump’s three and Vance’s 12.

 

image.png

 

The avoidance of the press is a dramatic shift in tactics, especially for Walz, who was previously known for his media accessibility. As governor of Minnesota, he was a frequent presence in both local and national media, despite occasional gaffes or misstatements. However, since joining the Harris ticket, Walz has adopted a far more reserved approach. Journalists who traveled with him in early September observed that reporters were kept at least 10 feet away and that shouted questions were ignored.

 

Harris has long maintained a distant relationship with the press, and her team appears to believe that reducing media appearances will limit negative moments. Harris' past interviews have sometimes led to unclear or flip remarks on key policies, which her campaign hopes to avoid by keeping her interactions with reporters to a minimum. The approach is not without precedent, as President Biden also limited his interviews during the pandemic in 2020, ultimately defeating Trump despite the restricted media presence.

 

However, this strategy carries risks. Polls suggest that many voters still feel unfamiliar with Harris and Walz. An ABC poll conducted in mid-August, prior to the Democratic convention, revealed that nearly a third of voters had no opinion of Walz. The lack of media appearances could prevent the Harris-Walz campaign from addressing this gap in voter awareness, leaving their platform and policies less understood by the public.

 

The Harris-Walz campaign has responded to criticisms of their media strategy by pointing out that they have been interviewed by various outlets and have participated in events like Harris' appearance at the National Association of Black Journalists. In a statement, the campaign emphasized that, in these settings, both candidates answer "tough questions" on the critical issues facing Americans in the upcoming election.

 

While this defensive posture may shield Harris and Walz from negative press, it also leaves their opponents with a greater share of media attention. Trump and Vance, despite their frequent controversial statements, have remained highly visible to voters. Vance, for example, has had to defend inflammatory comments, including a widely criticized remark about "childless cat ladies" and spreading unverified rumors about immigrants in Ohio. Yet, even with this negative attention, their frequent interviews keep them in the public eye.

 

Ultimately, the Harris-Walz campaign is betting that avoiding the press while running out the clock to Election Day will be more beneficial than potentially exposing themselves to blunders or controversies during interviews. But this strategy is not without potential pitfalls, especially in an era where voters increasingly want transparency and direct access to their leaders.

 

As Election Day approaches, the question remains whether limiting press access will prove to be a winning tactic or if it will leave voters feeling more disconnected from Harris and Walz. For now, the campaign seems determined to stick with their approach, despite frustrations from journalists and growing calls for more openness from the public.

 

Credit: AXIOS 2024-09-21

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Social Media said:

The Harris-Walz campaign is on track to set a new precedent in modern U.S. politics by engaging in fewer interviews and press conferences than any other major party presidential ticket

Well of course, they are incapable of holding up to public scrutiny without the aid of a political media cohort, even with that they fail and the only solution is to coward back and hide otherwise their true colors of have nothings and lies will further be exposed.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Obviously decided that having Harris in the public eye is not an advantage- a wise decision.

 

Also, when one has nothing to say, the cover is to say that one is reducing media interaction for xyz reasons.

This is the Marxist way.  So many stupid people will Democrat.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, newnative said:

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.  More teeth gnashing for Trump and his idiot running mate--who certainly should not have done 59 interviews.

Why not?  They have solutions.  They may not be able to fix all the problems, but be assured the Democrats caused ALL the problems.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

They' have been quiet all along.

 

A good strategy when what you have planned is unpalatable to most people. 

 

Not very democratic though.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...