Jump to content

Are these people stark raving mad?


MalcolmB

Recommended Posts

On 9/21/2024 at 1:21 PM, Jingthing said:

What a load!

He has said many times and very clearly that if he loses, then it was rigged.

That means to any person with basic logic the same thing as that he won't accept losing.

For Chrissakes, he hasn't even conceded the last election that he lost.

Do you need to be hit over the head with what he is for it to sink in?

Foreign or domestic trolls do not warrant our attention. My Absentee Ballot mailed today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2024 at 1:39 PM, blazes said:

Strange how all over American Pravda, it is taken for granted that if anyone is going to question the election results, it will be the GOP.

But the Dems never accepted the Clinton defeat and insisted falsely that the Russians (again and again) were  about  to take over; in the four years since Trump has been out of office he has been subjected to the full weight of lawfare that the Dem regime could throw at him. 

Plus, with all the insistence of Nazi propaganda, they call Trump a "threat to democracy" and are not surprised when someone believes the lie and tries to assassinate this threat.

Who actually believes that the Dems will quietly accept a Trump victory and will refrain from doing everything in their  power to remove the "threat to democracy.."??

As long as this clear and present danger exits, his threat to my country will be taken dead seriously. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2024 at 1:13 PM, CM Dad said:

Yes Malcolm, they are stark raving mad.  I am a veteran and I could never support a lying, cowardly, draft-dodger like Mr. Trump or any of his right-wing cohorts.

 

 

https://www.military.com/daily-news/opinions/2024/05/31/americas-veterans-need-second-term-of-president-trump.html

 

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/07/10/trump-draws-stronger-support-from-veterans-than-from-the-public-on-leadership-of-u-s-military/

On 9/21/2024 at 1:13 PM, CM Dad said:

Yes Malcolm, they are stark raving mad.  I am a veteran and I could never support a lying, cowardly, draft-dodger like Mr. Trump or any of his right-wing cohorts.

 

Try not to credit these foreign "documentaries" too much.

 

Do you have any veteran buddies that do support Trump?

 

Respectfully. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, placeholder said:

Here's what you claimed:

"The speaker of the house released a lot of the CCTV from the Capitol that day and if you ever get to see it, you will know that you are totally wrong. J6 was a set up. Pelosi has recently been shown on video saying that it was mainly her fault for refusing Trump's offer of 10,000 of the National Guard."

 

No evidence exists that Trump offered her 10000 National Guard troops.

 

What we do know is that Trump stayed glued to his television set rather than order the National Guard in.  And he waited 187 minutes from the time of his speech rather than ask the rioters to leave. And this is testimony from his own staff and republicans who were in attendance at the White House

https://archive.ph/6Gzhj

 

And if  you need a reminder of why they're called rioters, here it is:

 

It was very well documented that Trump offered her 10,000 National Guardsman. It was the police that allowed the people into the Capitol and they started the trouble by using tear gas and other munitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

You seem to very confused about how professional news outlets work.

 

On one hand they have editorials, op-eds, personal commentary, viewpoints which may well be written from a certain perspective.

 

On the other hand they report news based on evidence that is gathered and then present that news.

 

You really need to try harder.

 

 

Let's see how many are left in a years time. The presenters are dropping like flies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

He may not be stark raving mad, whatever that means, but he is quite insane, and unhinged, and he is a narcissistic psychopath, in addition to being a multiple felon.

Almost every word in your paragraph is nonsense. Every one of the "court cases" against him you refer to are dead in the water. He has an ego the size of a small planet but that is as far as it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bradiston said:

Sure, I understand. But there again, I don't suppose Bangladesh imports an exploitable impoverished desperate army of cheap labour, unless you count the Rohingya. The rich countries do it in the main. I guess communist china doesn't as they have a ready made source of cheap labour - the much less well off Chinese, probably from ethnic minorities, not Han. And Russia definitely imports cheap labour from all those annexed central Asian satellite soviet countries. And India has a conveniently nuanced caste system where the West has class. So yes, I guess you have a point. But to run an economy or a business successfully, your income must exceed your expenditure. That's called profit. And that to me is a sine qua non of capitalism. And probably of any other business model. To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability. Apparently there's a huge disinformation campaign backed by the Kremlin branding Kamala a communist, especially targeting Latino voters from heavy socialist fxxx ups like Venezuela and Bolivia. This has been bought by the MAGA morons who wouldn't know a Marxist dialectic if it grabbed them by the testicles and and swung them around the room. But they love expanding and promoting this utter BS. Like Vance said, lying's completely acceptable in certain circumstances. Put that on his gravestone.

Interesting. So what do you call what Biden and Harris have been doing for 3 and a half years and Harris in California for 10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Purdey said:

I believe that Trump can't afford to lose the election if he wants to stay out of jail.

He needs to give himself a pardon or die in prison.

And what would that be for? Every case against him is dead in the water. It's DOJ lawfare. All these nitwits who think that so many court cases thrown at him in the year leading up to the election are a coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""