Jump to content

Anti-Cannabis Law Draft: Political Compromise, Not Moral Outrage


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

i was quite vocal for a long time about anutin handling this....and he did. 

Yep! You did. Time to get stoned, to build the mountain of happiness. 🙂 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said before, the bottom line to all this is to wait and see.  There are still so many hoops to jump through that it is ridiculous. 

 

This may pass in the next 3 years, but I can see it still being a topic for the next election. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

The draft aims to limit cannabis use strictly to medical treatments, official research, and as an ingredient in food and herbal products.

 

Severe penalties, including hefty fines and potential jail time, are outlined for deviations, but the specifics remain ambiguous. Notably, the draft omits any mention of recreational cannabis use.

Surly deviation from the stated limited uses would include recreational use. This whole fiasco just needs some sort of regulation whilst keeping a 30 odd billion baht industry and the economic benefits thereof going. What we're getting is Thaksin/Anutin trade off. Be interesting to see if anything actually changes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, webfact said:

Severe penalties, including hefty fines and potential jail time, are outlined for deviations, but the specifics remain ambiguous.

Glad they don't consider lapidation, which would be self defeating. But T.I.T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RSD1 said:

Will people still be able to use cannabis quietly in their home or do they need to fear that the police will come crashing through their door

Looks like it.

keep everyone happy, the stoners can still get stoned as long as they are discreet about it and not blowing it in the complaining straight heads faces.

 

Thais are good at compromising.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, webfact said:

Anutin aims to protect his rural constituents who benefit economically from cannabis cultivation.

 

Their economic benefit will plummet if recreational use is recrimilised. Simple as that. That's where the money is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RSD1 said:

I can't quite work this out. Is this a win or not for cannabis users in Thailand? Will people still be able to use cannabis quietly in their home or do they need to fear that the police will come crashing through their door to arrest and/or fine them? 
 

I also wonder if there will be some unwritten line in the sand where if you have less than a certain amount in your possession then it will be overlooked, but above a certain amount and things get ugly?
 

The other question is if you are a medical cannabis user who intends to follow the law, then how will you be permitted to get your cannabis legally? Will you be able to get a doctor's report from any medical clinic and then just buy from any local cannabis shop of your choice or will you need to see a doctor at a government hospital and then buy your stuff from a government outlet only?
 

Maybe I'm missing something here, but, to me, all of the actual intent of this legislation is as clear as mud. 

You tink too mutt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...