Jump to content

Was Harris using an hearing gadget at the debate?


EVENKEEL

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Hummin said:

The whole Trump campaign is lies, more lies, and conspirecies, so what to expect really?

 

They see what they want to see, and hear exactly what they want to hear, nothing else. 

 

I thought you were less biased, given your posting history. I guess I was wrong about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I thought you were less biased, given your posting history. I guess I was wrong about that.

Then, you have not paid attention to my posts 😁

 

I have been anti Trump since the Apprentice show on TV, which I only managed two episodes.

 

Never liked the man before, and even less now. Don't you see and hear what he manage to say, and even worse not saying, leaving dubt in the air, and all magas makes their own conclusions. 

Edited by Hummin
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Of course, if it were suspicion that Trump had a hearing aid you'd likely accept it as fact, even without proof.

If there are reasonable suspicions either candidate had a hearing aid i would look into it and form my opinion.

This is not 'reasonable suspicions'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

The naysayers can make fun if you want but it's pretty interesting

The link you posted even ends saying its nonsense with the sentence " Well, it sure looks like theory has been put to rest."  Conspiracy theories are a waist of oxygen. I'm surprised no one thought perhaps someone was using anal beads as a signalling device much like that chess player was once accused of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

The Whining Gene and the Conspiracy Gene are strong in magas.

 

Based on nothing but a conspiracy that sane folks have proven false, magas produce yet another excuse for why their messiah made a fool of himself in the debate.

 

Was it the device Harris did not actually wear that made the felon say:

 

"They're eating the dawgs. They're eating the cats. They're eating the pets".

 

Perhaps the OP will next post of his belief in QAnon?

Back in the day the dems were voicing their own theory of Bush's sudden embellished speaking ability. Now, the same concerning Harris who is widely known for her word salads. 

 

Opinion Wireless technology might explain why US President George W. Bush performed better than usual in the last two presidential debates with his opponent, Senator John Kerry.

 

https://www.theregister.com/2004/10/12/bush_wireless_coaching/

 

It's just good fun. Take it easy ole man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also an interesting conspiracy theory floating around about a whistleblower at ABC news. This person claims that the questions were preselected and given to Harris, that embarrassing topics would not be mentioned, and that the set design/podium would be modified so that Kamala doesnt look short compared to Trump.  Still waiting for any independent confirmation though.

 

The affadavit was supposedly sworn on Sep. 9, the day before the debate. Interesting that the three topics mentioned in the affadavit as taboo were not brought up in the debate. And the network has admitted that Harris was given a smaller podium so that she didnt look bad on the split screens.   

 

We shall see. Could be crap, could be treasure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""