Jump to content

Kamala Harris Shifts Position on Border Wall, Signaling Tougher Stance on Immigration


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

Kamala Harris, once a vocal critic of the border wall during Donald Trump’s presidency, now pledges to allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to extend the barrier along the southern border if elected president. This shift comes as Harris embraces a more aggressive immigration policy, a significant departure from her previous liberal positions on issues such as Medicare for All and fracking, which her campaign now opposes.

 

Harris’ campaign appears to be adapting to the pressure of Trump’s repeated attacks on her stance on border security. While Harris now supports measures for the wall, she maintains key differences with Trump, particularly opposing family separation policies and mass deportation plans. In her recent speech at the Democratic National Convention, Harris voiced her intention to sign the bipartisan border security bill, a piece of legislation that Trump had previously blocked due to concerns it would politically benefit Democrats in the upcoming election.

 

The bill, negotiated by Senators James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), mandates that hundreds of millions of unspent funds be used to continue the construction of the border wall. Lankford remarked that the bill carries forward the standards set during the Trump administration regarding the structure’s height and location. "It requires the Trump border wall," Lankford told Axios, clarifying that the bill specifies where and how the wall must be built. The legislation’s estimated cost for continuing the wall stands at $650 million, a significant reduction from the $18 billion that Trump originally requested in 2018.

 

However, Harris’ camp argues that this legislation is not a full endorsement of Trump's wall and highlights that it involves much more than just wall funding. Her advisers pointed out that the bill does not allocate new money for the wall but merely extends the timeline for using funds appropriated during Trump's presidency, albeit with new restrictions to ensure these funds are used strictly for barriers. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to address the overloaded immigration system, such as increasing funding for asylum lawyers and judges, and grants the president the authority to close the border if more than 5,000 migrants cross in a single day.

 

This is a sharp contrast from Harris’ earlier stance. When she first ran for president in 2019, she condemned Trump’s wall as a "medieval vanity project" and consistently opposed any funding for its construction. In a 2020 Facebook post, Harris declared, "Trump's border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won't make us any safer." Earlier, in 2017, shortly after joining the Senate, she called the wall a "stupid use of money" and vowed to block any efforts to fund it.

 

Harris' recent support of the bipartisan border security bill has raised eyebrows, even among some of her political colleagues. Senator Lankford expressed surprise at Harris' full embrace of the bill, noting that she had not participated in the negotiations. "We never saw any vice president staff here," Lankford remarked. "I know she's talking about it now, but she wasn't talking about it at all before." Meanwhile, Senator Murphy described the bill as "aggressive," noting that it introduces new tools to manage the border but also emphasized that it does not stray from the nation's core values.

 

Although President Biden had criticized Trump for killing the compromise bill, some Democrats, including Senator Alex Padilla of California, took issue with the conservative nature of the policies within it. Padilla opposed the bill, stating that it "fails to provide relief for a single Dreamer, a single farmworker, a single essential worker or long-term resident."

 

Harris has positioned herself as a hardliner on immigration in her campaign ads, showcasing her time as California's attorney general and highlighting her support for increasing the number of Border Patrol agents. These moves come as Trump’s campaign continues to attack her on the administration’s struggles to handle surges of migrants at the southern border.

 

Harris' evolving stance on immigration reflects how the political conversation around border security has shifted in recent years, largely influenced by Trump’s presidency. Her willingness to support aspects of the border wall is a marked departure from her earlier rhetoric, illustrating the pressures and complexities of immigration policy in contemporary American politics.

 

Based on a report from: AXIOS 2024-09-28

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And of course it doesn't matter that she wants to keep them out, she can say that because she is on the left. I guess Obama was also, but some of his policies were also a bit right, and yes he also wanted to build walls.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tug said:

Lie#1 there was never a border czar that’s a magga lie #2 it is leagle to request asylum as the law is written the bipartisan border bill provides for 1500 direct border patrol agents + judges and case workers to clear the backlog of asylum seekers.i am dumbfounded that anyone cannot see what trump is up to and what an abysmal president he was….thaipo presidential scholars folks that study thease things have adjudged trump as the worst president in our history that’s a sad fact.trump killed the bill because he needs something to campaign on no more no less.

Rubbish from start to finish.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cryingdick said:

She shows up for a photo op by a wall she would demolish and her fish belly white VP would set up a ladder factory next to. I would love to see any member of this forum climb a border wall in that heat with a ladder and propel down the other side. Anybody that doesn't understand that is a barrier to entry is a moron. Can you imagine Tug or JT going up the ladder while the cartel pushes them over to freedom?

Well did you watch it?I did concise factual solutions orientated for real solutions.not as exciting as lying about immigrants eating pets or golden sneakers cartoon nfts nope no lies just stating the problems and finding the solutions……..no prisoners sent to invade like trumps hero actually does and trump says its brilliant…..nope she talked about her and our teams experience putting these cartel members behind bars……getting more equipment to indirect the fentanyl smugglers….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Social Media said:

image.png

 

Kamala Harris, once a vocal critic of the border wall during Donald Trump’s presidency, now pledges to allocate hundreds of millions of dollars to extend the barrier along the southern border if elected president. This shift comes as Harris embraces a more aggressive immigration policy, a significant departure from her previous liberal positions on issues such as Medicare for All and fracking, which her campaign now opposes.

 

Harris’ campaign appears to be adapting to the pressure of Trump’s repeated attacks on her stance on border security. While Harris now supports measures for the wall, she maintains key differences with Trump, particularly opposing family separation policies and mass deportation plans. In her recent speech at the Democratic National Convention, Harris voiced her intention to sign the bipartisan border security bill, a piece of legislation that Trump had previously blocked due to concerns it would politically benefit Democrats in the upcoming election.

 

The bill, negotiated by Senators James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), mandates that hundreds of millions of unspent funds be used to continue the construction of the border wall. Lankford remarked that the bill carries forward the standards set during the Trump administration regarding the structure’s height and location. "It requires the Trump border wall," Lankford told Axios, clarifying that the bill specifies where and how the wall must be built. The legislation’s estimated cost for continuing the wall stands at $650 million, a significant reduction from the $18 billion that Trump originally requested in 2018.

 

 

However, Harris’ camp argues that this legislation is not a full endorsement of Trump's wall and highlights that it involves much more than just wall funding. Her advisers pointed out that the bill does not allocate new money for the wall but merely extends the timeline for using funds appropriated during Trump's presidency, albeit with new restrictions to ensure these funds are used strictly for barriers. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to address the overloaded immigration system, such as increasing funding for asylum lawyers and judges, and grants the president the authority to close the border if more than 5,000 migrants cross in a single day.

 

This is a sharp contrast from Harris’ earlier stance. When she first ran for president in 2019, she condemned Trump’s wall as a "medieval vanity project" and consistently opposed any funding for its construction. In a 2020 Facebook post, Harris declared, "Trump's border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won't make us any safer." Earlier, in 2017, shortly after joining the Senate, she called the wall a "stupid use of money" and vowed to block any efforts to fund it.

 

Harris' recent support of the bipartisan border security bill has raised eyebrows, even among some of her political colleagues. Senator Lankford expressed surprise at Harris' full embrace of the bill, noting that she had not participated in the negotiations. "We never saw any vice president staff here," Lankford remarked. "I know she's talking about it now, but she wasn't talking about it at all before." Meanwhile, Senator Murphy described the bill as "aggressive," noting that it introduces new tools to manage the border but also emphasized that it does not stray from the nation's core values.

 

Although President Biden had criticized Trump for killing the compromise bill, some Democrats, including Senator Alex Padilla of California, took issue with the conservative nature of the policies within it. Padilla opposed the bill, stating that it "fails to provide relief for a single Dreamer, a single farmworker, a single essential worker or long-term resident."

 

Harris has positioned herself as a hardliner on immigration in her campaign ads, showcasing her time as California's attorney general and highlighting her support for increasing the number of Border Patrol agents. These moves come as Trump’s campaign continues to attack her on the administration’s struggles to handle surges of migrants at the southern border.

 

Harris' evolving stance on immigration reflects how the political conversation around border security has shifted in recent years, largely influenced by Trump’s presidency. Her willingness to support aspects of the border wall is a marked departure from her earlier rhetoric, illustrating the pressures and complexities of immigration policy in contemporary American politics.

 

Based on a report from: AXIOS 2024-09-28

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

Sounds like the typical politician shift in policy, and never to be honest in any way except to thine ownself  in order to possibly get more money from a different source.    Can't trust them at all IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tug said:

Well did you watch it?I did concise factual solutions orientated for real solutions.not as exciting as lying about immigrants eating pets or golden sneakers cartoon nfts nope no lies just stating the problems and finding the solutions……..no prisoners sent to invade like trumps hero actually does and trump says its brilliant…..nope she talked about her and our teams experience putting these cartel members behind bars……getting more equipment to indirect the fentanyl smugglers….

I watched it. So therefore, enlighten me on

 

What "factual solutions oriented for real solutions" did she set forth?

 

Why hasnt she closed the border? Why has she let rapists and murderers and terrorists flood our streets?

 

You will answer with more lies and bot word salad.

 

You spend more time obsessing over dogs and cats than RAPED AND MURDERED CHILDREN.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to hear Harris tell us it was wrong for Biden to reverse Trump's border policies. 

 

 

During his first day in office, Biden unveiled the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 and reversed many of Trump's policies on immigration, such as halting the construction of the Mexican border wall, travel ban, and signed an executive order to reaffirm protections for DACA recipients.[1][2][3] The Biden administration and Department of Homeland Security, under leadership of Alejandro Mayorkas, reined in deportation practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), prioritizing national security and violent crime concerns over petty and nonviolent offenses.[4]

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I want to hear Harris tell us it was wrong for Biden to reverse Trump's border policies. 

 

 

During his first day in office, Biden unveiled the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 and reversed many of Trump's policies on immigration, such as halting the construction of the Mexican border wall, travel ban, and signed an executive order to reaffirm protections for DACA recipients.[1][2][3] The Biden administration and Department of Homeland Security, under leadership of Alejandro Mayorkas, reined in deportation practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), prioritizing national security and violent crime concerns over petty and nonviolent offenses.[4]

The real conundrum of the harris campaign, convincing us that she will fix the problems that biden created without telling us that theres a problem

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I watched it. So therefore, enlighten me on

 

What "factual solutions oriented for real solutions" did she set forth?

 

Why hasnt she closed the border? Why has she let rapists and murderers and terrorists flood our streets?

 

You will answer with more lies and bot word salad.

 

You spend more time obsessing over dogs and cats than RAPED AND MURDERED CHILDREN.

 

 

Ask trump why he killed the border bill ehh as far as the rapists and murders how should I know I just live on the border never see them most likely is because 99% of the asylum seekers arnt criminals like trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us how the border bill would have stopped anything. You wont, you cant, it wouldnt.

 

Did you see the latest Border Patrol stats: 500,000 criminals released into our streets.

 

Every spec of inarticulate bullsh*t you botspew on these topics is best illustrated by your above answer on the Border. You lie, she lies and Americans die.  

 

 

Even if that were the case.....why block it???

 

 

Every person and his dog knows why......Trump........ like all wanna be dictators needs an enemy at the border so the hard of thinking can have there attention focussed on that whilst he milks the country dry and stays out of jail.

 

He couldn't give a monkey's about legal or illegal immigration.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Even if that were the case.....why block it???

 

 

Every person and his dog knows why......Trump........ like all wanna be dictators needs an enemy at the border so the hard of thinking can have there attention focussed on that whilst he milks the country dry and stays out of jail.

 

He couldn't give a monkey's about legal or illegal immigration.

Guess you dont know what was in the Bill, bot. If you are American, enjoy the screams of raped children that your ilk have allowed and continue to support.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kamal had 44 months to secure the southern border but did exactly the opposite allowing millions of unvetted illegal immigrants into the country along with 1.9M got-aways and she expects Americans to believe her fake concern now? Only her gullible brainwashed sheep followers beleive this cackling moron. Bidens regime and the border czar Kamala have unleashed and created the greatest national security and humanitarian sex/child trafficking crisis in American history! She can fix nothing, she's all talk, a consummate low achieving FRAUD.

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, illisdean said:

Kamal had 44 months to secure the southern border but did exactly the opposite allowing millions of unvetted illegal immigrants into the country along with 1.9M got-aways and she expects Americans to believe her fake concern now? Only her gullible brainwashed sheep followers beleive this cackling moron. Bidens regime and the border czar Kamala have unleashed and created the greatest national security and humanitarian sex/child trafficking crisis in American history! She can fix nothing, she's all talk, a consummate low achieving FRAUD.

 

 

Waiting for someone to point out that source is fake and counter with an msnbc link

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now








×
×
  • Create New...
""