Trump Challenges Special Counsel's Evidence Release in Election Case

[cjinchiangrai]

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

I only said to Walker88 that he could've mentioned all were under subpoena.

I didn't need to have it explained to me how the grand jury system works.

All witnesses are subpoenaed. Friendly or not. It is how they schedule the hearings.

[jerrymahoney]

Oh. Thanks.

I don't know why posting the comment to Walker88 and linking to a contemporaneous article on the grand jury testimony implied that I thought that was unusual. Edited yesterday at 08:11 AM by jerrymahoney

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, BarraMarra said:

The problem from an outsider like me is anyone goes against Trump and his supporters are liars, or out to get him. He and his supporters will never accept anything either Vote results or jury decisions that go against him and anything he says his supporters believe. Even film evidence is classed as a stitch up or a witch hunt against him. Like i said in previous threads if Trump said the Earth is flat his supporters believe it must be then. 

 

So much for the outsider stuff then

[Inderpland]

'“It’s really hard to do highlights because this is bombshell after bombshell after bombshell,” Weissmann said of the 165-page brief prepared by special counsel Jack Smith’s office.

“I mean, this is Watergate over and over again, the idea that this is a cancer on the presidency.”'

 

Stunned Ex-Prosecutor Sums Up New Trump Filing: ‘Bombshell After Bombshell After Bombshell’

[Walker88]

6 hours ago, G_Money said:

And when he wins in November you’ll be addressing him as Mr President.

 

Your new Commander in Chief.

 

He's toast. He will die in jail

5 hours ago, G_Money said:

Insert Harris Delete Trump.  Insert conwoman Delete conman.

 

I couldn’t of said it any better.

Of course you not only have nothing to back up your claim of Harris being a conwoman, you do it with childish grammar.

 

"I couldn't HAVE said it better", not "couldn't of"

 

Maybe you need to go back to 3rd grade.

[Tug]

7 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Simple. The testimony was not voluntary.

Of course it wasn’t first there’s partisanship but a very real terrifying 2ond theres trumps absolute willingness to send his most deranged supporters after you and your family as proven by Mike pences testimony.Kudos Mike Pence for having the strength of character and courage to honor your oath of office.

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, Walker88 said:

 

He's toast. He will die in jail

Of course you not only have nothing to back up your claim of Harris being a conwoman, you do it with childish grammar.

 

"I couldn't HAVE said it better", not "couldn't of"

 

Maybe you need to go back to 3rd grade.

 

“He’s toast.  He will die in Jail.”

 

How many times have we heard this?  But, but this time it’s for real.  Speaking of backing up a claim.  Where’s yours?  When was he sentenced to life in federal prison, not jail?  I must of missed that one.  
 

Your source?  The View or Jimmy Kimmel?
 

Showing signs of distress when all you have is a petty grammar mistake to come back with.  
 

Your time away from Langley is showing.  That CIA issued toughness has worn off.
 

Check your other comrades posts.  You’ll remain occupied with your obsession.

 

I would add more but have to land.

 

 

Edited yesterday at 03:42 PM by G_Money

[candide]

The title is misleading. Trump is not chalenging evidence. He's just whining, as usual! 😀

[shdmn]

32 minutes ago, candide said:

The title is misleading. Trump is not chalenging evidence. He's just whining, as usual! 😀

Shocking.  😲

 

He almost never does that.

 

 

Edited yesterday at 05:31 PM by shdmn

[Skeptic7]

23 hours ago, thaipo7 said:

You would be bleating too if you were treated 5% as bad as Trump has been the past 8 years.   You have no sense of fairness or right from wrong.

Umm...he's a criminal, con-man and thief. Oh and also an abuser of women. He's been treated like a king, while it's HE who treats everyone else badly. You reside in some whacked out, delusional MAGA backasswards world of stupid. It's you who has no sense...of anything. 

Edited 20 hours ago by Skeptic7

[stevenl]

7 hours ago, candide said:

The title is misleading. Trump is not chalenging evidence. He's just whining, as usual! 😀

Yes, he's whining. But the title is correct, he's challenging the release of the evidence as it states.

[newnative]

     Super important that this information is made available to the public before the election so voters can make an informed decision on their next president.  How anyone could vote for this scumbag is beyond me.  Meanwhile, for crybaby Trump, don't do the crime if you can't do the time.  Lock him up already.

[G_Money]

18 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Says a guy who is confused over the actual topic of discussion.

Gaslighting again?

[BarraMarra]

21 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

So much for the outsider stuff then

So you believe Trump is innocent of everything and all and sundry are wrong nauseus ?

[nauseus]

6 hours ago, newnative said:

     Super important that this information is made available to the public before the election so voters can make an informed decision on their next president.  How anyone could vote for this scumbag is beyond me.  Meanwhile, for crybaby Trump, don't do the crime if you can't do the time.  Lock him up already.

 

Oh yes. Super important this election interference business is.

[nauseus]

52 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

So you believe Trump is innocent of everything and all and sundry are wrong nauseus ?

 

How on earth did you come to that conclusion? My comment concerned the 'outsider' claim.

[newnative]

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

 

Oh yes. Super important this election interference business is.

Glad we finally agree on something!  Progress!

[stevenl]

8 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Oh yes. Super important this election interference business is.

So being informed is election interference? I would say that suppressing information is election interference.

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

So being informed is election interference? I would say that suppressing information is election interference.

 

Laptop info maybe?

[cjinchiangrai]

Motion denied. It is an ongoing criminal trial, not a new investigation.