Thai man reverses amicable divorce after catching wife with another man

[webfact]

 

 

A Thai man reversed an amicable divorce agreement with his wife after catching her with another man a day before signing the official divorce papers. Instead, he filed an adultery lawsuit against her and her lover.

 

The 21 year old Thai man shared in an interview on the news programme Hone Keasae that he discovered his wife’s affair about a month after they had separated. Although they had not yet signed official divorce papers, he found her with her lover in their former shared room in Chon Buri province.

 

The man explained that he and his wife were married for about a year but they were living separately because his work was based in Bangkok. Nevertheless, he visited his wife every Wednesday to spend time together.

 

Recently, he noticed a change in his wife’s behaviour. She rarely answered his calls and even blocked his contact, leaving him confused. He decided to discuss the situation with his ex-wife, which only made matters worse.

His wife caught him talking to his ex-wife online, which made her angry, and she demanded a divorce. The man insisted that his conversations with his ex were purely friendly, with no romantic feelings involved. However, the couple agreed to separate and scheduled to sign the official divorce papers on October 17.

 

Condom proof of affair

 

The man went on to explain that on October 16, the day before the scheduled signing, he went to their former shared room in Chonburi to collect his personal belongings. He arrived at around 11pm and found another man in the room.

 

He immediately recorded a video of the situation, which angered his wife, who then slapped him. This led to an argument with her lover. The lover claimed that he had not yet engaged in any sexual activity with the wife but the man was unconvinced.

 

The man told the media that he found a pack of two condoms, with one missing, which led him to believe that his wife already had sex with her lover.

 

According to the man, his wife insisted that the condoms did not belong to either of them. She also pointed out that the condoms expired, questioning who would use them in such a state.

 

The man expressed his anger, saying that his wife could not even wait a single day to finalise the divorce before bringing another man to the room. He decided not to proceed with the divorce and instead intends to take legal action against her and her lover for adultery.

 

The woman and her alleged lover have yet to come forward to share their side of the story.

 

by Petch Petpailin
Photo via Channel 7 and Hone Krasae

 

Source: The Thaiger 

-- 2024-10-18

 

 

[impulse]

Sign the amicable agreement and move on. 

 

It's not worth it.  That big knot is in your stomach.  Not theirs.

 

[SAFETY FIRST]

33 minutes ago, webfact said:

The 21 year old Thai man

 

33 minutes ago, webfact said:

His wife caught him talking to his ex-wife

Crikey, 21-year-old has a wife and an ex wife, soon to be 2 ex wives 😂

 

Sounds like a few AN members here, many Thai marriages. 

 

I've only been married once, that was enough for me. 

I do have several spouses that I still support. I can't seem to shake them, probably my fault, I keep giving them money. 

 

 

[CHdiver]

Somebody should tell him that he does not have to marry just to get laid.

[mran66]

21 years and two sinsods done already, probably looking for 3rd already. 

 

Can't fix stupid. 

[Cameroni]

3 hours ago, webfact said:

he found her with her lover in their former shared room in Chon Buri province

 

She should pay the price. Classless and disrespectful to bang someone in the former shared accomodation. Sue her for all she's worth.

[Fat is a type of crazy]

If you've already agreed to being divorced and the relationship is done and are about to sign papers are you required to be loyal till it's actually signed. No. He'd have to prove it went further back in time to when she was supposed to be the loving wife. 

[spidermike007]

He sounds like a rather pathetic and highly emasculated man, who does not have much control over his own life, nor emotions. Things aren't working out so just move on, do you understand any of that? Or is that too complicated a concept for you? 

[Mason45]

8 hours ago, mran66 said:

21 years and two sinsods done already, probably looking for 3rd already. 

 

Can't fix stupid. 

I'd suggest that his balls are bigger than his brains.

[NickyLouie]

who used the expired 3rd condom ?

[hotchilli]

12 hours ago, webfact said:

A Thai man reversed an amicable divorce agreement with his wife after catching her with another man a day before signing the official divorce papers. Instead, he filed an adultery lawsuit against her and her lover.

Good on him... she couldn't wait.

[jacko45k]

The ability of the cheating couple to produce lies on the fly is very impressive!

[Scouse123]

Sounds like typical immature kids playing at adults.

 

I guess there will be no silver wedding anniversary in that household.

[john donson]

funny is the ex got pregnant from the new dude, he can still claim it is his...

[OneMoreFarang]

17 hours ago, webfact said:

According to the man, his wife insisted that the condoms did not belong to either of them. She also pointed out that the condoms expired, questioning who would use them in such a state.

 

I have to admit I never checked for an expiry date on a pack of condoms. Are they expired after a week or two? Or years? Can expired condoms still be used with expired old women? 

[AustinRacing]

They were separated for a month and pending divorce. I’d say she’s done nothing wrong. The guy is obviously butthurt, immature and jealous. 

[Mason45]

The question still arises what happened to to spent condom?

[Foek]

Wow , a whole artical about an 21 year old child.

You can write stories like this every day.

[off road pat]

On 10/19/2024 at 12:10 AM, spidermike007 said:

He sounds like a rather pathetic and highly emasculated man, who does not have much control over his own life, nor emotions. Things aren't working out so just move on, do you understand any of that? Or is that too complicated a concept for you? 

Hm, a 21 years old with 2 ex-wives !!?? Well on the way for a life full of multiple ex-wives !

[MalcolmB]

Most Thai women have multiple men on the go.

Second most promiscuous women on the planet.

Which is why most of us are here and why this forum exists.

God bless them.

[Mason45]

Many of these types of Thai ladies have had more pricks than a 2nd hard dart board.

[Liverpool Lou]

On 10/18/2024 at 10:11 PM, Fat is a type of crazy said:

If you've already agreed to being divorced and the relationship is done and are about to sign papers are you required to be loyal till it's actually signed. No.

Yes!  They are required not to commit adultery if they are still married, doesn't matter what stage the "paperwork" is at or what the status of the relationship is, they're still married until the divorce is final.

[Liverpool Lou]

On 10/19/2024 at 10:21 AM, john donson said:

funny is the ex got pregnant from the new dude, he can still claim it is his...

Huh?

[Liverpool Lou]

22 hours ago, AustinRacing said:

They were separated for a month and pending divorce. I’d say she’s done nothing wrong. The guy is obviously butthurt, immature and jealous. 

They are both still married to each other.  If she's banging another bloke in the marital home, legally she's done a lot that is wrong for a married woman.

[Fat is a type of crazy]

11 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes!  They are required not to commit adultery if they are still married, doesn't matter what stage the "paperwork" is at or what the status of the relationship is, they're still married until the divorce is final.

The key point would be that they both agree to separate - hard to see how subsequent to this you can hold someone to such a condition. Many couples separate but don't divorce for a while. They are treated in all sorts of ways as being two separate people once separated but before the final signing. Google seems to confirm this but not based on Thai law. If you have something that says otherwise might be interesting to see. 

[Hummin]

On 10/18/2024 at 4:20 PM, Cameroni said:

 

She should pay the price. Classless and disrespectful to bang someone in the former shared accomodation. Sue her for all she's worth.

childish, its over, move on

[AustinRacing]

13 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

They are both still married to each other.  If she's banging another bloke in the marital home, legally she's done a lot that is wrong for a married woman.

Have to disagree. Once separation is agreed upon, they’re no longer a couple. The marriage thing becomes the paperwork stuff that can be sorted out later. On a personal level, you’re free to shag or be shagged. 

[Liverpool Lou]

14 hours ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

14 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Yes!  They are required not to commit adultery if they are still married, doesn't matter what stage the "paperwork" is at or what the status of the relationship is, they're still married until the divorce is final.

The key point would be that they both agree to separate

No, the key point is that, until they are divorced, she is still married to her husband and that carries certain marital obligations.

[AustinRacing]

38 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the key point is that, until they are divorced, she is still married to her husband and that carries certain marital obligations.

Geez, we’ve moved on from biblical times. There maybe legal obligations but as far as personal matters are concerned all bets are off. Whether you like it or not it is what it is and nothing can be done about it. Once separated, you’re not cheating. 

[Liverpool Lou]

17 minutes ago, AustinRacing said:

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the key point is that, until they are divorced, she is still married to her husband and that carries certain marital obligations.

There maybe legal obligations...

Exactly, legal obligations are the point when marriage, adultery and divorce are in the picture as were specifically referenced in the OP.   Moral opinions of this case by others are irrelevant, even today.