Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

In a recent shift, some schools in Scotland have introduced the gender-neutral title "Mx" for teachers, with children as young as four now being encouraged to use this term when addressing staff. This change aims to create a more inclusive environment for non-binary individuals and those who do not identify strictly as male or female. However, the use of gender-neutral titles in classrooms has sparked a broader debate about the appropriateness of discussing gender identity with very young students.

 

For Women Scotland campaigner Marion Calder

 

According to figures from Scottish councils, at least 86 educators, including teachers, teaching assistants, and aides, have adopted the "Mx" title instead of traditional titles like Miss, Mrs, Ms, or Mr. Of these, 13 are in primary schools, and 73 work in secondary schools. Edinburgh has the highest concentration, with 44 staff members recorded as using a gender-neutral title. However, actual numbers may be higher, as some councils do not track this data.

 

Supporters argue that using gender-neutral titles in schools reflects a progressive approach to inclusion, recognizing non-binary identities and fostering respect among students. However, critics have raised concerns about introducing such concepts to young children. Scottish Conservative spokesperson for children and young people, Roz McCall, stated that focusing on these "fringe issues" diverts attention from core educational goals, arguing that this shift may leave some children feeling uncomfortable or confused. 

 

Campaign groups such as For Women Scotland and Parent Watch Scotland have also expressed opposition. Marion Calder, of For Women Scotland, argued that introducing non-binary concepts in classrooms can be confusing for young children, likening the emphasis on gender identity to "astrology" and urging teachers to avoid bringing personal ideologies into their professional roles. She voiced concerns over the trustworthiness of teachers in students' eyes, asking, “How are children to believe anything a teacher says if they lie about something so fundamental?” This sentiment was echoed by Parent Watch Scotland, which claimed titles like "Mx" often require explanations that could serve as conversation starters about gender identity, a topic some feel is inappropriate for younger students.

 

In addition to the debate over titles, critics also point to broader issues related to gender identity in Scottish schools. Some teaching materials reportedly include discussions of multiple gender identities, with lessons suggesting there are at least 17 genders. These approaches have raised questions about parental involvement, with critics arguing that parental consent is often overlooked when affirming students’ gender identities.

 

A significant shift in Scotland’s approach to gender issues in education occurred after the Cass Review, an assessment of gender services in England, called for more thorough research on the impact of puberty blockers and other gender-affirming treatments for youth. As a result, Scotland has paused the prescription of puberty blockers for young people, signaling a cautious approach to medical interventions for gender dysphoria in response to the findings.

 

The ongoing discourse around titles like "Mx" underscores a growing debate on the role of schools in addressing gender identity and inclusivity. As schools strive to balance inclusivity with developmental appropriateness, the debate is likely to continue, raising complex questions about the role of education in shaping young minds.

 

Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-12

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Seems about as crazy as eating sheep brains for lunch.

My second job was working for a guy from South Africa. His idea of a yummy lunch was a cooked sheep's head, including the eyes. I passed on it.

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)

Well before the West table the gender issue, Thailand has always accepted the kind of people who look like  men but women inside.

Or vice-versa.

And such ones are in broad spectrum of the society(in most occupations) here.

 

Diversity is Certainly Their Strength.

Edited by black tabby12345
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

My totally made-up statistic:

This will help maybe 0.1% of the students.

And it will confuse probably more than 10% of the students.

Is it a good idea to help 1 and confuse 100? No! Don't do it. Case closed.

 

Posted

This sounds like a gender/trans-related extension of all titles, male and female, similar to the change in the use of Mrs. or Miss on the names of females in the 1980s. The preferred "marriage-neutral" title for females is now "Ms."

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NativeBob said:

Scotland? is it where Highlander and James Bond came from? 

How ironic pathetic!

 

Higlander and James Bond are fictitious characters. Like Hannibal Lecter.

Posted
48 minutes ago, chickenslegs said:

Seems it can be pronounced Max, Mex, Mux. Not confusing at all.

 

I'm still getting used to Ms.  Mizz...

 

Posted
1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

This sounds like a gender/trans-related extension of all titles, male and female, similar to the change in the use of Mrs. or Miss on the names of females in the 1980s. The preferred "marriage-neutral" title for females is now "Ms."

 

Exactly. What's the beef? Thailand shows that the 'third gender' functions quite well without all the ructions of sticks-in-the-mud who can't adapt to changing times and societies. I can still remember the uproar in the 60s about men wearing long hair. 

 

Nothing is permanent, nothing is certain, everything is constantly changing. Those unable to adapt to that (and there's always a ledger of excuses for not adapting) will be miserable, unhappy and resentful until they do. Some saddos sadly never do.

 

Mx.

 

Jesus wept!

  • Love It 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BusyB said:

 

Higlander and James Bond are fictitious characters. Like Hannibal Lecter.

No way! Really? What a waste of life... 

And Skyfall didn't exist? 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, NativeBob said:

No way! Really? What a waste of life... 

And Skyfall didn't exist? 

 

'Fraid not ;D

 

Although there was one scene in that film (which I saw in Pattaya on the wide screen):

 

When the bad guy hops out of his chopper with his gang and they start off up the glen towards the showdown with the other fictitious character, I was catapulted back to late teens Army days in the 70s, when I spent a lot of time spread out like that as part of a section patrolling up the glen. The  POV in the film was an unreal experience that really jolted me. 

Edited by BusyB
Posted

I certainly wouldn't want any child of mine going to that school, or indeed taught by any of those teachers that now refer to themselves as Mx.

 

Wokeness is appearing everywhere now.

Posted
16 minutes ago, BusyB said:

The  POV in the film was an unreal experience that really jolted me. 

Thank you. I got it. I thought "Moonrakers" times are long time over and Broccoli Brothers (hahaha) would spend some money for experts.

Back to the topic - still it is very unusual to hear that such cr*p might take place in Scotland. Ever

Posted

Controversy Over ‘Mx’ Titles: Young Pupils and Gender-Neutral Teachers. 

 

What in Satans name , Stick to what's the Truth; Male,Female. 

No Wannabes as Teachers in the schools It's bad enough already as it is for the kids. 

Posted (edited)

Nothing other than grooming children into the progressive woke left radical agenda by progressive woke left "educators".

Edited by dinsdale

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...