Jump to content

Why experts are blasting Trump for 'already breaking the law'


simple1

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

He needs to sign ot get certain manadatory briefings if I'm not mistaken. That he hasn't signed is a tell that feathering his own nest is a top priority.

Hopefully he is being brought up to speed on Project 2025

 

How is it a tell that feathering his own nest is a top priority? 

 

Why should it be a high priority? 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, simple1 said:

“Donald Trump and his transition team are already breaking the law,” Senator Warren wrote. “I would know because I wrote the law. Incoming presidents are required to prevent conflicts of interest and sign an ethics agreement. This is what illegal corruption looks like.”

 

'What illegal corruption looks like': Why experts are blasting Trump for 'already breaking the law'

What does legal corruption look like ?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Donald Trump, Leonard Leo and Clarence Thomas to name but a few.

You completely missed the point of my question. I will try again. What is the difference between, as you call it, ILLEGAL corruption, and LEGAL corruption ? 

If this is too difficult for you forget about it. Not important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Thingamabob said:

You completely missed the point of my question. I will try again. What is the difference between, as you call it, ILLEGAL corruption, and LEGAL corruption ? 

If this is too difficult for you forget about it. Not important.

 

I answered what LEGAL corruption looks like. Illegal corruption is of no interest to me.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The voters of America gave Trump and his masters a free rein, or is that a free reign?

 

He will do exactly what he wants subject to his backers approval and the Dems will have to simply suck it up. We already know the law does not apply to some individuals in the good ole US of A!

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

He has been breaking the law since the late 70s, he is a career criminal, and he's very comfortable breaking the law, so I'm not sure why anybody would think that he wouldn't continue breaking the law. Especially after what he considers to be a mandate by the people. 

What laws was he breaking in the '70s?

 

Not everyone thinks "He has been breaking the law since the late 70s, he is a career criminal, and he's very comfortable breaking the law..."

 

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Why? Because he is and will continue to throughout his presidency and in his personal life. He's a convicted felon, after all. What do you expect?

Actually, he's not now nor has he ever been a convicted felon. 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gargamon said:

Russia.

Need not leave the focus on the USA. Political candidates dependent on campaign contributions from wealthy individuals and businesses. Quite legal …

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ifmu said:

trump is ONE rotten apple in the barrel  ... more to come 

 

Oh didums another disappointed Kamala supporter crying into their latte. If deporting illegals (same as Obama) finishing the wall, cutting prices and inflation, ending woke trans nonsense, strengthening the military and not being involved in wars etc etc is being a rotten apple then lets hope there is an orchard of them.

  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Answer the question. You continually post nonsense. Then when caught,  try to distract by going off on a tangent.

 

what was the question? I tend to ignore a lot of time wasters demanding people answer their frivolous questions

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Actually, he's not now nor has he ever been a convicted felon. 

Please continue screaming your cultish beliefs so the sane amongst us can have a good head shake and laugh.  Or you could "do your own research" and find out that once a judge issues an adjudication the defendant's status is exonerated or convicted.  Appeals do not change the defendants status until resolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2024 at 10:25 PM, Lacessit said:

" Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel". ( Dr. Samuel Johnson )

 

Sure is.

 

On 11/13/2024 at 8:35 AM, proton said:

 

So the founding fathers were all scoundrels then, ok!

You've made a severe logic error.

 

A basic example:

All dogs are mammals.

A whale is a mammal, therefor a whale is also a dog.

 

Samuel Johnson in effect said:

All scoundrels claim patriotism as a defense.

 

You claim:

The founding fathers claim to be patriots.  Therefor they were also scoundrels.

 

Do you see what you did there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, proton said:

 

Oh didums another disappointed Kamala supporter crying into their latte. If deporting illegals (same as Obama) finishing the wall, cutting prices and inflation, ending woke trans nonsense, strengthening the military and not being involved in wars etc etc is being a rotten apple then lets hope there is an orchard of them.

 

When during trump's term did the US cease being involved with wars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...