Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not relevant here. I was obviously referring to the topic here related to gay civil rights.

 

Don't gays in civil partnerships have the same rights as a married couple?

 

What's the difference?

 

Why not just be in a civil partnership?

Posted
4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Not relevant here. I was obviously referring to the topic here related to gay civil rights.

 

Don't gays in civil partnerships have the same rights as a married couple?

 

What's the difference?

 

Why not just be in a civil partnership?

Posted
6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Yep. State sanctioned grooming to children directed toward a minority radical agenda. Then it's the kids got gender euphoria, then it's onto hormone blockers and then it's off to the surgeon. It's absolute madness.

Gender Euphoria?

Hilarious!

What's madness is the hysteria evidence in your post.

Time to disengage.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, FruitPudding said:

 

Don't gays in civil partnerships have the same rights as a married couple?

 

What's the difference?

 

Why not just be in a civil partnership?

No.

The 1980's are calling and you're stuck there.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Your ignorance and bigotry is legendary.

Time to disengage.


Why disengage?  Are you defeated?

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

No.

The 1980's are calling and you're stuck there.


Why can’t you give an intelligent reply?

 

Could it be you have no intelligent answer so you withdraw like a snake and wither away.

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Gender Euphoria?

Hilarious!

What's madness is the hysteria evidence in your post.

Time to disengage.

If you think calling gender reassignment surgery for children and convincing children they are not boys but girls or visa versa is hysteria then you show yourself for what you actually are. Completely and utterly divorced from reality.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, FruitPudding said:

The are just using the LGBT thing as Orwellian thought control.

Doesn't seem to have worked on you though. 

Posted
7 hours ago, NoshowJones said:

One day I walked into a public toilet and noticed a guy standing at the entrance, I thought nothing of it and just walked to a urinal, the guy immediately appeared at a urinal next to me, there were no other guys at any other urinal.

What sort of behaviour would you call that?

You didn't mention it so I guess this guy didn't talk to you, didn't touch you,' didn't threaten you (other than your manhood,) and so was really no threat to you at all, right? Except in your mind?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 1:27 AM, Yagoda said:

I wonder how the Arab tourists view it, considering that such conduct is punishable by death in those nations.


Notized this in a bar in Pattaya a few years ago.
Guess this answer your question.
 

10365580_795309433834315_6255415747806167582_o_795309433834315.jpg

Posted
3 hours ago, FolkGuitar said:

You didn't mention it so I guess this guy didn't talk to you, didn't touch you,' didn't threaten you (other than your manhood,) and so was really no threat to you at all, right? Except in your mind?

Your post is one big load of nonsense. Read my reply to Jingthing.

Posted
11 hours ago, Confuscious said:


Notized this in a bar in Pattaya a few years ago.
Guess this answer your question.
 

10365580_795309433834315_6255415747806167582_o_795309433834315.jpg

That famous sign, which has been around since the internet existed, doesn't answer any question.

Posted
15 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You mean when little Billy goes to grade school as a boy and returns home that very same day as Betty (now with boobs) much to the shock of his/her parents?

And then Social Services takes the kid away because the parents object.

 

Homosexual movement requires grooming to stay alive since people aren't born homosexual

  • Agree 2
Posted
14 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

 

Don't gays in civil partnerships have the same rights as a married couple?

 

What's the difference?

 

Why not just be in a civil partnership?

No they needed to be married because marriage to most people has religious connotations and the homosexual movement wanted to make sure that they spit in people's faces

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 10:23 AM, Yagoda said:

You mean folks who are wrestling with mental illness.

 

Love how you guys throw hate at folks who wrestling with mental illness. Shows how Orwellian the whole thing is. Guy puts on a Leather Jockstrap and SS Officers cap and parades around screaming that he is coming for your children is normal and celebrated, while some poor sad soul, wrestling with the sexual urges caused by years of abuse is "In the closet", an object of scorn and derision.

"Guy puts on a Leather Jockstrap and SS Officers cap and parades around screaming that he is coming for your children "

 

I hate it when that happens.

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, NoshowJones said:

Your post is one big load of nonsense. Read my reply to Jingthing.

 

You and Yagoda could be poster boys for Homophobia.

Perhaps it's time to stop judging others.
 

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 9:14 AM, JimTripper said:

I was at a cafe yesterday and intentionally sat off to the side to not get involved with anyone. Quite pleasant. I was watching some ladies walk by and enjoying my latte when this gay looking Thai guy sits down nearby and keeps glancing over at me. Kind of annoying!

 

Have you tried BBC therapy? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Baht Simpson said:

I'm not a leftist. And I'm intelligent enough to know that Darwin never said we were decended from apes. only that we may have descended from a common ancestor.

 

You're free to believe what you wish. 

Very true.

And comparisons of the genome of humans and apes bears the conclusion out with a large percentage of shared DNA.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

 

Don't gays in civil partnerships have the same rights as a married couple?

 

What's the difference?

 

Why not just be in a civil partnership?

 

Great point, "Fruit Pudding."  

Also, why not have segregated bathrooms if they are just as good as the "normal" bathrooms? Why not have gays sit in the back of busses? I mean, they still get to their destination. What's the problem? Separate but equal is the way to go, right? 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
49 minutes ago, FolkGuitar said:

 

You and Yagoda could be poster boys for Homophobia.

Perhaps it's time to stop judging others.
 

Maybe Homo's should stay away from other guys in a toilet especially one where there is no one else, there would be no need for anyone to be Homophobic if these people would just keep their goings on behind closed doors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...