Foreign man flees after sexually assaulting Thai woman in condo lift - video

[NanLaew]

On 11/20/2024 at 9:08 AM, save the frogs said:

why would someone rape in a country where sex is so readily available everywhere?

 

 

 

Rape is about POWER, not sex.

 

I would have thought all aseannow's mysoginist apologists knew this already?

[NanLaew]

On 11/20/2024 at 9:56 AM, john donson said:

no follow up yet?  weird that all CCTV has like a vaseline film on the camera that seems to blur

 

vaseline does that

[NanLaew]

23 hours ago, candide said:

Where did I write It's only in Pattaya?

My point is just that when there is wide access to cheap sex,it is less likely that people feel the need to assault a women. Unless the guy is broke.

 

Sexual assault is about POWER, not sex.

[madone]

 

18 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

You disgust me... Taking a story with very little details and making it into a heinous crime. Twisting the words for assault and harassment to suit your needs or beliefs when there is a very big difference especially in punishment to the perp.

You have no idea what happened in the elevator other than he touched her face and other places and not even sure those other places would constitute an assalt charge. Then you twist it into sexual assault.. You should be ashamed of yourself. 

 

 

I see that the police have arrested the man for sexual assault. Are you planning to pop by the station and offer them your interpretation?  Explain it was a misunderstanding?

The unwanted contact and the video is clear as is the fact that she was terrified.

I'd say those are adequate details, thanks. His behavior is as heinous, as your attempts to dismiss it,

Also, I did not twist the words, I provided a definition for them.  My needs do not come into the equation.

 

Quote

the perp

 

Stop watching detective shows.

 

Quote

I hope one day you are in an elevator and a woman enters and you happenstance touch her shoulder or even her back to guide her. And she files a sexual assault charge on you. 

yeah, no.

 

I don't touch people I don't know. Nor can i see why I would need to guide someone in an elevator beyond a tap on the shoulder if they could not hear me and were in my way.

There are non-threatening ways to initiate contact, and your spurious example here has nothing to do with the actions of the man in the video

 

Quote

You have no idea what happened in the elevator other than he touched her face and other places and not even sure those other places would constitute an assalt charge. Then you twist it into sexual assault.. You should be ashamed of yourself. 

 

Actually, i can see what happened in the elevator, video is like that.

Again the unwanted contact is clear. Her fear is evident. If anything in the video he does appears like acceptable behavior to you, I think its best you stay in or find someone to keep you in line if you do venture out. 

you just get creepier with every post, doncha? 

Edited yesterday at 04:42 AM by madone

[Hamus Yaigh]

On 11/21/2024 at 5:14 AM, thesetat2013 said:

I never said it was not assault or harassment...  You twisted it into sexual assault which is clearly defined as touching certain parts of the body.. Then you have the gall to say i am defending this creep? When clearly i was outlining that it was perhaps not sexual assault... 

You are one serious sicko if you think this. The key element is the lack of consent, and the fact that the perpetrator is acting for their own gratification, without regard for the victim's wishes or autonomy, that is sexual assault end of no matter where he touches her.

[Briggsy]

I suspect this sex offender is not here as a tourist. There is a high likelihood he is here on business of some sort. If so, he may be confident he can use his connections to escape justice.

 

Either way, he will almost certainly reoffend given the nature and manner of his offence.

[theshu25]

3 minutes ago, Briggsy said:

I suspect this sex offender is not here as a tourist. There is a high likelihood he is here on business of some sort. If so, he may be confident he can use his connections to escape justice.

 

Either way, he will almost certainly reoffend given the nature and manner of his offence.

Pray tell how you have come to this conclusion? Unbeleivable some of the rubbish people write on here.

[spidermike007]

On 11/20/2024 at 8:38 AM, soalbundy said:

A little exaggerated for some light groping, she suffered no physical harm.

I think it's fairly easy for a man to say that, but when the shoe is on the other foot I think it's an entirely different thing. I think often times women in this situation feel quite helpless, especially if it's a guy that's considered me larger than her. There's never any excuse for this kind of behavior. If you want to grope a woman it's fairly easy to do that here, you just have to pay for it, and then it's consensual. 

 

No free gropes! Especially when they are uninvited. A very sharp pencil to his genitals would have been quite effective. 

[soalbundy]

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I think it's fairly easy for a man to say that, but when the shoe is on the other foot I think it's an entirely different thing. I think often times women in this situation feel quite helpless, especially if it's a guy that's considered me larger than her. There's never any excuse for this kind of behavior. If you want to grope a woman it's fairly easy to do that here, you just have to pay for it, and then it's consensual. 

 

No free gropes! Especially when they are uninvited. A very sharp pencil to his genitals would have been quite effective. 

Certainly more appropriate than burning him alive. My point was that yes, he frightened her and touched her inappropriately but he didn't physically harm her and she was able to leave the lift to seek help. There is always a lot of extreme self righteous judgement in such cases, faux shock horror which ought to be contested, not that it matters what we write at all.

[richard_smith237]

2 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

Certainly more appropriate than burning him alive. My point was that yes, he frightened her and touched her inappropriately but he didn't physically harm her and she was able to leave the lift to seek help. There is always a lot of extreme self righteous judgement in such cases, faux shock horror which ought to be contested, not that it matters what we write at all.

 

Psychological harm is just as bad as physical harm...     the attacker didn't need to cause any physical damage for 'harm' to exist...   She was petrified, this could take her time to get over....   Imagine her fear next time she gets in a lift and another  male enters... 

 

There is no 'extreme self righteous judgement' there is just 'simple judgement'...  Its not faux at all.

 

Its surprising that people such as yourself remain so ignorant to the realities of such issues - make no mistake, this was a sexual attack, it frightened the young girl.

 

IF this was your daughter - would to tell her to 'get over it - theres no physical harm' ????     (and don't answer that you don't have a daughter - that much is obvious due to your ignorance - but the point still remains).