Jump to content

BBC Staff Divided Over Call to Wear Palestinian Flag Colors and Keffiyeh


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

A workplace initiative urging BBC staff to wear the colors of the Palestinian flag and keffiyehs in solidarity with Palestine has sparked division and raised concerns, particularly among Jewish employees. Organized by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) as part of a broader "workplace day of action" for Palestine, the event aims to advocate for a ceasefire, the cessation of violence in Gaza, and the release of hostages. Scheduled for Thursday, the TUC has encouraged participants to visibly demonstrate their support by wearing red, green, black, or the traditional Palestinian keffiyeh.  

 

The National Union of Journalists (NUJ), which represents many BBC staff, endorsed the event, sharing the call to action with its members. The NUJ also condemned Israeli military actions, stating that since October 7, 2023, at least 135 Palestinian journalists have been killed. "The NUJ is urging branches and chapels to show support on the day and amplify the union’s calls," it said.  

 

However, the initiative has drawn backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC, who worry that visible displays of solidarity with Palestine could jeopardize the broadcaster's impartiality and alienate colleagues. One BBC journalist expressed frustration, describing the action as "hypocritical and antisemitic" and criticizing it for encouraging behavior that might contravene the organization’s impartiality standards. “BBC journalists, who pride themselves on impartiality and who fought to keep their NUJ free of politics, are being encouraged to break the BBC’s editorial guidelines by supporting a political cause,” the journalist said.  

 

Charlotte Henry, a freelance journalist and creator of *The Addition*, a media and tech newsletter, announced she had left the NUJ over its stance. “It has become a hostile environment for Jews, and I can no longer be a part of that,” she stated.  

 

The controversy underscores the tension between advocacy and impartiality within the BBC, where employees are expected to adhere strictly to neutrality guidelines. The Trades Union Congress, which represents 5.5 million members across various sectors, has been criticized by some Jewish organizations for its perceived insensitivity toward Jewish workers.  

 

The Board of Deputies of British Jews issued a statement condemning the TUC’s approach. "It is time for these unions to decide, are they there to support workers or to play student politics on a conflict on whose facts they appear to be plainly ignorant," it read. The Board also warned that introducing such issues into workplaces risks exacerbating tensions for Jewish employees. “Whatever the stated intent, attempts to bring this issue into the workplace in such a fashion will undoubtedly add to the belligerent atmosphere which many Jewish staff have been facing.”  

 

This debate highlights the challenges of navigating political activism in professional environments, particularly in institutions like the BBC, where impartiality is a core principle. As the day of action approaches, the division among staff serves as a stark reminder of the complexities involved in balancing advocacy, solidarity, and neutrality.

 

Based on a report by The Times 2024-11-28

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Sad 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, jippytum said:

For some time the proud boast of impartiality by  the BBC is no more. 

Woke directors and self opinionated presenters have destroyed the reputation and once proud ehthic of a previously world class news organisation. 

 

 

Read the article - the headline is misleading. The initiative is from the  TUC and NUJ, not the BBC. 

Posted

For many years I have been an avid watcher of Aljazeera news. Since the Oct 7 massacre and the retaliation by Israel against Hamas in Gaza, I have seen a definite pro Palestine anti Israel bias in their reporting and comments. I have stopped watching now 

  • Confused 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, jippytum said:

For some time the proud boast of impartiality by  the BBC is no more. 

Woke directors and self opinionated presenters have destroyed the reputation and once proud ehthic of a previously world class news organisation. 

 

Once upon a time, not now unfortunately.

 

New Report from former BBC Director Criticizes Coverage of Israel-Hamas Conflict

https://aseannow.com/topic/1341711-new-report-from-former-bbc-director-criticizes-coverage-of-israel-hamas-conflict

 

Jeremy Bowen Defends BBC Amid Allegations of Bias Over Israel-Hamas Coverage

https://aseannow.com/topic/1338211-jeremy-bowen-defends-bbc-amid-allegations-of-bias-over-israel-hamas-coverage/

 

BBC Accused of Bias in Israel-Hamas Coverage: Over 1,500 Breaches of Guidelines

https://aseannow.com/topic/1337643-bbc-accused-of-bias-in-israel-hamas-coverage-over-1500-breaches-of-guidelines/

 

BBC Chairman Calls For a Thorough Review of Israel-Hamas War Bias

https://aseannow.com/topic/1338006-bbc-chairman-calls-for-a-thorough-review-of-israel-hamas-war-bias/

 

 

Posted

I'm pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli as far as the conflict over their territories goes. As long as the wearing of the Palestinian flag colors by the BBC is just an ENCOURAGEMENT, I see nothing wrong with this. If, however, there is some attempt to PERSUADE or ORDER their employees to wear these colors, I am against it. Employees should be allowed to express their own political opinions on matters like these but should not be compelled to do anything like this by their employers. 

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I'm pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli as far as the conflict over their territories goes. As long as the wearing of the Palestinian flag colors by the BBC is just an ENCOURAGEMENT, I see nothing wrong with this. If, however, there is some attempt to PERSUADE or ORDER their employees to wear these colors, I am against it. Employees should be allowed to express their own political opinions on matters like these but should not be compelled to do anything like this by their employers. 

 

It is not a BBC proposal; the article makes clear that it came from the TUC. However, as the very mention of the BBC is catnip to the perma angry, it's guaranteed to get lots of incorrectly attributed bile here. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

It is not a BBC proposal; the article makes clear that it came from the TUC. However, as the very mention of the BBC is catnip to the perma angry, it's guaranteed to get lots of incorrectly attributed bile here. 

It affects the BBC staff and the BBC impartiality rules. The fact its not a direct BBC proposal has no bearing on the rules that are in place.

 

9 hours ago, Social Media said:

However, the initiative has drawn backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC, who worry that visible displays of solidarity with Palestine could jeopardize the broadcaster's impartiality and alienate colleagues. One BBC journalist expressed frustration, describing the action as "hypocritical and antisemitic" and criticizing it for encouraging behavior that might contravene the organization’s impartiality standards. “BBC journalists, who pride themselves on impartiality and who fought to keep their NUJ free of politics, are being encouraged to break the BBC’s editorial guidelines by supporting a political cause,” the journalist said.  

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I'm pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli as far as the conflict over their territories goes. As long as the wearing of the Palestinian flag colours by the BBC is just an ENCOURAGEMENT, I see nothing wrong with this. If, however, there is some attempt to PERSUADE or ORDER their employees to wear these colours, I am against it. Employees should be allowed to express their own political opinions on matters like these but should not be compelled to do anything like this by their employers. 

A simpler approach might be to give each individual journalist the freedom of choice, with a caveat that they cannot complain what other journalists choice is.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Desperate stuff from the Telegraph.

Reporting on a backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC and the possible breaking of the BBC's impartially rules if it goes ahead. Why is it desperate? Are the other outlets that report it also desperate?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Desperate stuff from the Telegraph.

 

  The T in T.U.C doesn't stand for "Telegraph" 

They are the Trades Union Congress . they aren't the Telegraph  Union Congress

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  The T in T.U.C doesn't stand for "Telegraph" 

They are the Trades Union Congress . they aren't the Telegraph  Union Congress

Oddly I didn’t mention the TUC.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Reporting on a backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC and the possible breaking of the BBC's impartially rules if it goes ahead. Why is it desperate? Are the other outlets that report it also desperate?

Because it’s not reporting any breaking of impartiality rules.

 

I think it’s fair to assume the NUJ has members in a UK News outlets, including The Telegraph.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Reporting on a backlash from Jewish staff at the BBC and the possible breaking of the BBC's impartially rules if it goes ahead. Why is it desperate? Are the other outlets that report it also desperate?

 

The key word being 'if'. That's why it's desperate - the desperation being all the BBC haters hoping that this transitions from a nothing to something they can really froth about. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Its the T.U.C who are trying to organise this . 

The Telegraph would just be reporting on the T.U.C's actions 

But I didn’t comment on the TUC.


 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:

 

The key word being 'if'. That's why it's desperate - the desperation being all the BBC haters hoping that this transitions from a nothing to something they can really froth about. 

 

 Correct.

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, RuamRudy said:

 

The key word being 'if'. That's why it's desperate - the desperation being all the BBC haters hoping that this transitions from a nothing to something they can really froth about. 

 

So only report after the event, not on the concerns of the Jewish staff and others that disagree and the imminent breaking of impartiality rules "if" it goes ahead? 

 

Got it, wait for the jews to froth first........

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But I didn’t comment on the TUC.


 

 

He didn't say you did. He was explaining facts however, unlike you.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...