New evidence suggests genetic material in the COVID shots may INTEGRATE with human DNA.

Yale University scientists have discovered that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, but never infected, still had spike protein in their bloodstream years after their last shot.

One study participant showed spike protein in their bloodstream more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, while others had spike protein present 450+ days later.

The researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators), which points to potential long-term immunosuppression in vaccinated individuals.

According to AlexBerenson < https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-yale-researchers-have-found > these findings raise the possibility that genetic material from the COVID shots may integrate with human DNA, potentially explaining the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream observed in vaccinated individuals.

This unpublished study is led by Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a respected Yale scientist and former strong proponent of COVID vaccines. Dr. Iwasaki had previously dismissed vaccine safety concerns as “absurd” and publicly supported vaccine mandates.

However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue. Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications, which could collapse the “safe and effective” narrative propagated by the government and media.

As @MidwesternDoc explains:

“A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove ‘long vax’ is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it).”

As of now, the Yale scientists plan to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server. If the public actually gets a chance to see this, it could change everything.

 

Source: https://vigilantfox.news/p/covid-vaccines-could-integrate-with

It's Very Bad News for those that were coereced/conned/mainpulated in taking the '100% safe and effective' mRNA-shots under the guise of 'protecting' their health.  But these research findings by a Yale University team headed by mRNA Vax-promoter Dr. Akiko IWASAKI won't go away by ignoring them. 

Yale scientists: Covid spike protein found in blood of individuals two years after they received injections

by WorldTribune Staff, December 20, 2024

 

The Covid spike protein was found in the blood of people up to two years after they received the Covid mRNA injection, a team of scientists at Yale University have found.

The individuals in the study were never infected with Covid, antibody tests show. The immune system normally rapidly destroy newly produced spike proteins. The finding suggests some people who took the shots may be making the proteins on their own.

“The spike proteins shouldn’t be there,” Alex Berenson noted in a Dec. 19 Unreported Truths Substack.com analysis. “A possible reason is that genetic material delivered in the shots has integrated with human genes and is continuing to activate protein-making structures in our cells. If found to be correct, this explanation has serious implications for mRNA vaccine safety and the more than 1 billion people who received mRNA Covid doses.”

The head of the Yale team, Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, is a scientist who had strongly advocated for the Covid jabs.

Iwasaki is a former president of the American Association of Immunologists. In May 2021, she told The Washington Post that concerns about mRNA shots were “absurd” and added that “no safety concerns” had been found in their clinical trials. She later signed a letter advocating Covid vaccine mandates.

At an October town hall, Iwasaki reported that the team had found Covid spike protein in a study participant more than 700 days after the person’s last mRNA shot, and in others more than 450 days after.

The Yale team reported its findings on conference calls with participants in their study in October and again this week, Berenson noted. “Two people independently told Unreported Truths of the study’s findings.”

The people who told Unreported Truths of the findings included one person who participates in the study and directly heard the reports from the Yale researchers on the conference call. The other person is a scientist who is in contact with multiple members of the Yale team.

“The researchers discussed publishing the findings with at least one major peer-reviewed journal, a person with direct knowledge of those discussions said. The journal declined,” Berenson added.

The Yale scientists plan to publish their findings soon on a unreviewed “pre-print” server so that other researchers and members of the public can see them and discuss their implications.

“They also intend to send samples to an independent lab for validation, though they do not believe they’re mistaken,” Berenson wrote.

Phillip Altman, a Pharmacologist – Clinical Trial and Drug Regulatory Affairs senior industry pharmaceutical consultant in drug research and regulatory approval with more than 40 years experience, noted in a Dec. 19 Substack.com analysis:

“This was ALWAYS a danger from the very beginning when an experimental gene-based product was imposed on the world’s population without the usual proper safety testing. Such gene-based products carry significant safety risks and this is why, up to now, these products were researched and used in only rare genetic disorders and cancers where there was no viable alternative. Many gene-based products have failed safety testing and their long term safety is uncertain. …

“If the results of this Yale University study can be confirmed, it means that potentially billions of people have had their DNA altered, possibly permanently, to produce toxic spike protein indefinitely which may translate into a range of cardiovascular, neurological, immunological and oncogenic effects into the future.

“How can the politicians, health bureaucrats and so-called ‘health experts’ allow this to continue in light of this frightening prospect?

“I predict Big Pharma will endeavor to block publication and discredit this Yale study without providing any evidence to the contrary.”

 

Source: https://www.worldtribune.com/yale-scientists-covid-spike-protein-found-in-blood-of-individuals-two-years-after-they-received-injections/

Where's the peer reviewed paper? This may as well be by some idiot on YouTube or TikTok.

Yes, sad some are just realizing how the possible ... IMHO ...'gene therapy' drug they allowed to get injected into them, may have serious consequences now and in the future.  

 

Changing the definition of 'vaccine' and calling it a vaccine, doesn't change that it was nothing more than a 'possible' ... IMHO ... gene therapy drug.

 

mRNA therapy & RNA gene therapy is a play on word semantics.... IMHO ...  One injected to allow the body to develop changes, the other 'RNA' injected to directly cause a change.

 

Some folks, as reported (do a google) want the mRNA to be classified as gene therapy.  

 

Corruption rules ... IMHO

 

It's 'safe & effective' ... really, oh yea and

It's not a gene therapy ... really, you can trust us 

 

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were. It's like the naked emperor, it was already during covid.

 

But hey no worries, all these turbo cancers, the excess of deaths at older age groups with 20-30% increases etc all mean absolute nothing and are just a coincidence. Nothing to see here move on, until it's you...

17 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Where's the peer reviewed paper? This may as well be by some idiot on YouTube or TikTok.

From the article, of which you obviously only scanned the headline

> The Yale scientists plan to publish their findings soon on a unreviewed “pre-print” server so that other researchers and members of the public can see them and discuss their implications.

But no worries I will update this thread when the results are published...

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

The Yale scientists plan to publish their findings soon on a unreviewed “pre-print”

Post as many unreviewed papers as you like. All garbage until the feedback comes back and it's actually published in a reputable journal.

14 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were. It's like the naked emperor, it was already during covid.

 

But hey no worries, all these turbo cancers, the excess of deaths at older age groups with 20-30% increases etc all mean absolute nothing and are just a coincidence. Nothing to see here move on, until it's you...

Put yourself in their shoes.

 

Way back when, most of us filthy unvaccinated would say things like “up to you…it’s your choice…it’s between you and your doctor”.

 

But the vaxxed would cajole, denigrate and shame all of us unvaxxed.  
 

If we, however said our doctor suggested that it might not be good for us we would be told “your doctor is a quack!!  Get another doctor!!” culminating in us being told to “get the jab” by quite a few on here (no need to name names) and subsequently shunned by friends and family.  I was even invited to have coffee one time by a forum member here…until he found out I was unvaxxed…then I was dropped like a leper.
 

They will hold onto their beliefs until the bitter end because of course, that is better than admitting they were wrong and “having blood on their hands”.  And when the time comes for them to “meet their maker”….well…

 

”There are no atheists in foxholes”

 

And then, it is too late.

 

I am not so nervous about Covid spike protein found after two years as I don't know if that is good or bad. But what about the GPS tracker, is that still in the blood after two years?

Rubbish reports from rubbish sources, most importantly, without any direct comment or substantiation from Professor Iwasaki, the claimed source of these reports, which seems entirely fitting for this new AN sub-forum:

 

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vigilant-news-bias/

 

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-tribune/

 

 

https://www.factcheck.org/person/alex-berenson/

 

and a long list fact check reports on Berenson's past false statements and claims regarding COVID.

 

 

The most recent published comment that I can find from Akiko Iwasaki, who is indeed a prominent and respected researcher, regarding COVID vaccines came last month in November to NBC News, as follows:

 

Do the Covid vaccines provide long-lasting protection?

The CDC is recommending that older adults get a second Covid shot in the spring. How durable are the vaccines?

 

"Despite the CDC recommending an additional shot, there’s no evidence that the mRNA vaccines aren’t working as expected, said Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunology at the Yale School of Medicine.Rather, Iwasaki said, there may be something unique to this virus that is preventing people’s bodies from maintaining high levels of immunity." [emphasis added]

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/durable-are-mrna-covid-vaccines-rcna178457

 

And a news search of the subject of this thread finds ZERO recent news reports from any reasonably credible sources reporting any of the claims being made in this thread.

 

Fact Check: No evidence for vaccine DNA risk raised by Florida Surgeon General

By Reuters Fact Check

February 6, 2024

 

"There is no evidence to suggest that residual DNA fragments in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines pose a health risk raised in statements by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo."

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-vaccine-dna-risk-raised-by-florida-surgeon-general-2024-02-05/

 

 

 

 

https://fullfact.org/health/covid-vaccines-not-dna-altering/

 

 

22 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Fact Check: No evidence for vaccine DNA risk raised by Florida Surgeon General

By Reuters Fact Check

February 6, 2024

 

"There is no evidence to suggest that residual DNA fragments in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines pose a health risk raised in statements by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo."

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-vaccine-dna-risk-raised-by-florida-surgeon-general-2024-02-05/

 

 

 

 

https://fullfact.org/health/covid-vaccines-not-dna-altering/

 

 

 

Is that the same Reuters Fact Check which said this in March 2021?

 

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/middle-east/astrazeneca-finds-no-evidence-of-increased-blood-clot-risk-from-vaccine-idUSKBN2B60L5/

 

Fast forward to 2024:

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-withdraw-blood-clots-b2541291.html

 

 

 

Reuters apparently also thinks transgender & non binary people are real 

 

 

On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were. It's like the naked emperor, it was already during covid.

 

Are oldies still alive? Yes or no? That's all that matters 

Yes.

 

Several of my closest friends were conned (or manipulated, or coerced) into accepting the cl0t shots / DNA re-arrangers.

 

This is 100% about profit motive (and p0pulation kontrol) and has nothing whatsoever to do with concern for public health (i.e. the useless eaters' lifespan).

 

No matter what sort of tripe Tall John Guy in BKK flexes.

On 12/21/2024 at 8:39 AM, Red Phoenix said:

But no worries I will update this thread when the results are published...

Why bother keep posting complete and utter nonsense conspiracy theories. Seek therapy would be my advise.

On 12/21/2024 at 10:27 AM, gargamon said:

Post as many unreviewed papers as you like. All garbage until the feedback comes back and it's actually published in a reputable journal.

 

reputable? they are all 'bought/captured' and live by expensive reprints for big pharma...

On 12/21/2024 at 8:19 AM, gargamon said:

Where's the peer reviewed paper? This may as well be by some idiot on YouTube or TikTok.

Welcome to "Off The Beaten Track" where posts without links to "peer reviewed" papers and only "trusted news sources" are no longer a requirement to keep the posts from being dropped in the memory hole.

What I find interesting is the level of cognitive dissonance in those who voluntarily took the mRNA shots out of fear of a mild flu which was hyped as a "killer-flu" and "the plague" by pharmaceutical companies with a profit motive as well as the US main-stream media who receive the majority of their advertising revenues from - the same pharmaceutical companies.  And the "pharmaceutical regulators" were onboard because the FDA/CDC/NIH all suffer from regulatory capture as there is a revolving door between the regulators and those corporations they supposedly regulate.  Those 'revolving doors' between regulators and pharmaceutical companies needs to be shut down and locked.
So the rather dumbed down and overly-accepting public were bombarded with propaganda for three years, but now that facade of propaganda is being torn down piece-by-piece and, over time, those peer reviewed papers showing the flaws in the original rushed "research" by pharmaceutical companies and the immediate acceptance by bought-and-paid-for regulators will finally come to light.  What is coming to light was well was the deliberate media suppression of any research or opinion by doctors and researchers who published information that didn't fit the "only acceptable narratives" provided by "the only accepted experts." 

Now I started with "cognitive dissonance," let me continue.  Those who willingly took the shot will never accept the new research showing the flaws in the "Safe and Effective" narrative as well as the entire "we must Lockdown and Vaccinate everyone" narratives.  The role of natural immunity will come back to the forefront of scientific research, and the vaccine research will again be vetted for Long-Term Safety and Efficacy as opposed to fast-tracking so-called vaccines backed not by solid independent research over time, but by pharmaceutical companies profit-motivated propaganda augmented by their "captured regulators" who work for the benefit on the pharmaceutical companies and not the public.  Those who took the shots willingly and continue to do so (while experiencing their 3rd of 4th case of Covid like Fauci as well as other health issues) will deny any new research showing the flaws of the rushed mRNA technology - such as the integration of shots into the DNA of humans and other flaws which show that the rushed mRNA tech is neither "Safe" or "Effective."  That's called cognitive dissonance.

Like I stated in the past (now in the memory hole) - there is a place for mRNA research and technology, but it needs to only be approved for human use after years of long-term testing as well as independent research which is not tainted by conflicts of interests in the promotion of the "vaccines" and mRNA pharmaceutical products.

On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were.

...and then they will still defend it.  Again - cognitive dissonance.

Bottom line: Most people cannot conceive of, or believe in, the reality of a cabal that does not have the public interest at heart.

On 12/21/2024 at 8:39 AM, Red Phoenix said:

From the article, of which you obviously only scanned the headline

> The Yale scientists plan to publish their findings soon on a unreviewed “pre-print” server so that other researchers and members of the public can see them and discuss their implications.

But no worries I will update this thread when the results are published...

We're rapidly getting back to how science (as opposed to "The Science") is suppose to function.
The scientific method requires active and engaged discussions by all parties regarding the pros and cons, and the flaws and benefits of any research topic.  Between 2020 to 2023 those discussions where literally censored, and any scientists who didn't bow down to the narratives of "The Science" were slandered, maligned, and threatened with academic and professional destruction.  "The Science" itself was one-sided, anti-science, fascist propaganda with the sole object of supporting pharmaceutical corporations revenues and profits.

Well - it's a new dawn.  Hopefully a new dawn for the Scientific Method.

9 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Is that the same Reuters Fact Check which said this in March 2021?

 

 

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/middle-east/astrazeneca-finds-no-evidence-of-increased-blood-clot-risk-from-vaccine-idUSKBN2B60L5/

 

Fast forward to 2024:

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-withdraw-blood-clots-b2541291.html

 

 

 

"Fact Checkers" are entities who are highly biased toward one singular view which then rejects all other views.

It is a con. But a damn good one! 

49 minutes ago, Digitalbanana said:

Why bother keep posting complete and utter nonsense conspiracy theories. Seek therapy would be my advise.

And out of the woodwork comes those pro-mRNA shots, pro-lockdowns, pro-masks conspiracy theorists weaving "Conspiracy Theories" about the "Anti-Covid conspiracy theorists."

It really is laughable if it wasn't so freaking sad.

23 minutes ago, Woke to Sounds of Horking said:

Bottom line: Most people cannot conceive of, or believe in, the reality of a cabal that does not have the public interest at heart.

They are called corporations, and many - especially pharmaceutical corporations - are predatory.

They care about one thing: PROFIT!  The public good be damned.

7 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

I actually thought that was fake ... NO

... not only real, but people act like it was something right or normal to do

 

Sheeple believe anything they are told ... mind boggling

34 minutes ago, connda said:

On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were.

...and then they will still defend it.  Again - cognitive dissonance.

 

Yes, none so blind as those that refuse to see.

 

1 hour ago, Celsius said:

 

Are oldies still alive? Yes or no? That's all that matters 

 

I'm still alive but the left side of my face is still numb, I don't have the balance to climb a ladder and the fatigue has me taking a nap every day, since the day after my 2nd Pfizer.  That matters, too. 

 

And my friends who opted out of the jabs?  They're still alive, too.  With none of the side effects.