15 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Huh?  How do you know she had no experience of a similar car?

I don't, I am just guessing. OK?

18 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

 

Oh OK, I read a different article 

No, you probably read SOME of the same article, but did not take into your brain what was written.

25 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I'm sure he didn't swerve to avoid the cat, KNOWING he would hit someone. That's the definition of an ACCIDENT.

Read the story again, it was a WOMAN = SHE driving the EV.

6 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

No, you probably read SOME of the same article, but did not take into your brain what was written.

Please explain, what are you talking about? 

 

 

3 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Please explain, what are you talking about? 

 

 

OK, read it how you want to.

Thanks for that. Hence my comment 'OK. A male nurse then'.

7 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Read the story again, it was a WOMAN = SHE driving the EV.

 

No 1. Check her blood ABV

No 2. Check her phone record.

6 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

OK, read it how you want to.

It reads like a crazy person wrote it. 

 

4 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

It reads like a crazy person wrote it. 

 

Yep, you can call him AI  (Paul Simon)

48 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Read the story again, it was a WOMAN = SHE driving the EV.

The gender of the driver, the cat, or the person hit doesn't matter to me. I did read the article, but I missed the references to the driver as a woman. Thanks for your correction. 

3 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

The gender of the driver, the cat, or the person hit doesn't matter to me. I did read the article, but I missed the references to the driver as a woman. Thanks for your correction. 

Who knows what is a HE or a SHE these days. And are we really allowed to differentiate? They are all THEY or an IT to the Wokers. Cheers. 

1 minute ago, KannikaP said:

Who knows what is a HE or a SHE these days. And are we really allowed to differentiate? They are all THEY or an IT to the Wokers. Cheers. 

Ah, ha! The person in question "knows" whether they are a "he" or a "she," and we should respect their gender identity and not impose our gender assignment on them. That's our "woke" position. 

Just now, WDSmart said:

Ah, ha! The person in question "knows" whether they are a "he" or a "she," and we should respect their gender identity and not impose our gender assignment on them. That's our "woke" position. 

And maybe the cat was a schoolgirl identifying as a cat.

It was on the Thai news this morning, the cat was called Lucky and was ginger 🤫

1 minute ago, KannikaP said:

And maybe the cat was a schoolgirl identifying as a cat.

In that case, would you then support the swerve? 

Just now, roo860 said:

It was on the Thai news this morning, the cat was called Lucky and was ginger 🤫

Thank goodness I know that now.

What colour hair did the offending driver, and the sadly deceased lady have I wonder.

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

In that case, would you then support the swerve? 

No, as I said earlier, I would support examination of her phone, ABV test, and ask for how long she had been driving the smashed car. 

CCTV could possibly determine her speed.

9 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

and we should respect their gender identity and not impose our gender assignment on them. That's our "woke" position.

That certainly isn't my, or many other's position.

Maybe the driver identified as a crab and thought that they were going forward.  555

1 hour ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Do prisons take dead people? 

 

Why are you replying to someone's post (incorrectly) trying to correct them?  Didn't you just post a rant post the other day about other people replying to you, saying they must be mentally ill? 

 

You've actually often said how you would like people to mind their own business and not reply to you (normally when they disagree with you), but here you're happily doing so.  What's up with that?

8 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Why are you replying to someone's post (incorrectly) trying to correct them?  Didn't you just post a rant post the other day about other people replying to you, saying they must be mentally ill? 

 

You've actually often said how you would like people to mind their own business and not reply to you (normally when they disagree with you), but here you're happily doing so.  What's up with that?

I'm allowed to ask questions. 

 

Unfortunately, the way people tailgate here if you brake they might rear-end you.  I would continue on and run these animals over better them then you.

 

2 hours ago, KannikaP said:

And a red plate shows it was pretty new, so the driver was inexperienced at driving it.

There's your answer.

 

Totally agree that most likely was the case. EVs are very quiet so it's quite possible that she was going faster than she realised. Red Plate=Red Flag for me when I see red plate cars I'm always cautious to keep well away, as previous experience shows their driving often erratic.

 

59 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Thank goodness I know that now.

What colour hair did the offending driver, and the sadly deceased lady have I wonder.

I reckon they probably had black hair, but that's a guess.

55 minutes ago, soi3eddie said:

 

Totally agree that most likely was the case. EVs are very quiet so it's quite possible that she was going faster than she realised. Red Plate=Red Flag for me when I see red plate cars I'm always cautious to keep well away, as previous experience shows their driving often erratic.

 

Slightly off topic, but what are you supposed to do when a car has 'Baby on Board' sticker?

1 hour ago, KannikaP said:

That certainly isn't my, or many other's position.

Maybe the driver identified as a crab and thought that they were going forward.  555

Whoever put SAD on my post does not know what 555 means. Sad.!

7 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

Red plated EV's are overtaking red plated BMW and Mercedes for driving dangerously at speed. 

 

 

 

You can now buy an EV that will do 0-60mph in 4 seconds for a little over a million Baht.

 

Recipe for disaster in the hands of the unskilled and arrogant driver.

14 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

14 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, it's the same article, you just didn't read it.

You didn't read my comment. 

Where did I say that the driver was dead?

 

Two can play this game. 

 

Ha, ha, I asked a simple question

I see your annoying actions everyday, you have too much free time, you purposely look through the comments, jumping into action to intentionally antagonize and provoke others if we make silly mistake.

 

I actually caught you out with your comment on this thread, you made a silly mistake, not reading my comment, assuming I said that the driver was dead. 

 

I hope you are accountable and learn from your silly mistake, lessons learnt Lou. 

 

Now STOP misbehaving, nobody perfect, that includes YOU.