Gottfrid Posted January 9 Posted January 9 3 hours ago, hotchilli said: They only need to be chained up when they are out of control.. Sorry to break it to you, but when they are out of control, it´s always too late. 1
Gottfrid Posted January 9 Posted January 9 3 hours ago, Thingamabob said: If this dog was permanently chained it could not have attacked the owner. Something not right about this. To your point, no dog, of whatever breed, should be chained all its' life. Cruel beyond belief. Yeah, in my opinion it´s better to shoot it directly. 1 1
richard_smith237 Posted January 9 Posted January 9 1 hour ago, nauseus said: 6 hours ago, Gottfrid said: That kind of explains it all. Or this: He also suggested that the dog might have been stressed, as it had been chained for an extended period. I can't see much Pitbull in there either, if any. Not that that will help it now. A Poodle would not have been strong enough to chew its owner to death.... The Pit-bull part definitely explains it... Not that I have any sympathy for the owner at all, I'm just glad this wasn't an innocent visitor or child who was mauled to death. 1 1 1
jvs Posted January 9 Posted January 9 54 minutes ago, nauseus said: Looked at the lot. Maybe a slightly broad head but really a broad Thai mix of lots of things. Here's an adorable Pitbull. See what I mean? Does not look like a pitbull to me.Build to heavy for that,this is more like a American Bully. 1
nauseus Posted January 9 Posted January 9 1 minute ago, jvs said: Does not look like a pitbull to me.Build to heavy for that,this is more like a American Bully. Blame google 1
Popular Post hotchilli Posted January 9 Popular Post Posted January 9 47 minutes ago, Gottfrid said: Sorry to break it to you, but when they are out of control, it´s always too late. Sorry to break it to you, mostly it's too late when they are out of control or off the chain.. except in this case the owner was within range. But hey, he got what he deserved 1 3
Ben Zioner Posted January 9 Posted January 9 4 hours ago, roo860 said: And fed adequate poison, gotta be cruel to be kind. I volunteer to castrate it using vice, before poisoning. 1
Ben Zioner Posted January 9 Posted January 9 45 minutes ago, jvs said: Does not look like a pitbull to me.Build to heavy for that,this is more like a American Bully. naahhh.. should rename that breed Pitbullseye. 1
steven100 Posted January 9 Posted January 9 14 hours ago, Georgealbert said: cross between a Thai breed and a Pitbull, was found chained up at the scene, barking loudly. 14 hours ago, Georgealbert said: was a beloved pet a beloved pet ... your joking !! no pity at all .... you want to keep a pitbull cross .... you risk the consequences of your actions. 1
richard_smith237 Posted January 9 Posted January 9 Just a thought here... It is possible the 84 year old died of natural causes within the radius of the dogs reach, and out of hunger, the dog resorted to eating the owners flesh ?? 1
Georgealbert Posted January 9 Author Posted January 9 UPDATE Dog Relocated to Animal Shelter After Fatal Attack on Owner Picture courtesy of Khaosod. Following the death of an 84-year-old man in Saraburi Province, his dog, a black Thai-pit bull mix has been tranquilised and relocated to an animal shelter in Khao Kwang District. The attack occurred on 8 January in the victim’s home in Din Sopong community, Thap Kwang Subdistrict, Kaeng Khoi District. Relatives of the victim requested that the dog be taken to the Thap Kwang Municipality Animal Shelter, fearing it might pose a threat to others. On arrival, the dog exhibited aggressive behaviour, growling and baring its teeth at staff. Authorities sedated the dog with a tranquiliser dart before safely transporting it to the shelter. The shelter’s director, Mr. Paitoon Chantra, stated that the dog has been placed in a secure area alongside other aggressive animals. He assured that the shelter would provide proper care, sufficient food, and monitor the dog’s behaviour closely in line with animal protection laws. Deputy Mayor Mr. Winai Sawangarom confirmed that dog’s aggression has subsided slightly since its relocation. “We will continue to observe the dog’s temperament to ensure it poses no further risk to people,” he said. The shelter’s team is committed to adhering to the Prevention of Animal Cruelty and Animal Welfare Act while ensuring the safety of the community. Further assessments will determine the Dog’s long-term future at the facility. -- 2025-01-10
Thingamabob Posted January 9 Posted January 9 13 hours ago, Gottfrid said: Yeah, in my opinion it´s better to shoot it directly. Not my point. Never mind
watchcat Posted January 10 Posted January 10 19 hours ago, Will B Good said: How sad....for the dog I mean, if it had been chained up all or most of its life.......what goes through these peoples minds?....Anything? Air? 2
MalcolmB Posted January 10 Posted January 10 14 hours ago, richard_smith237 said: It is possible the 84 year old died of natural causes within the radius of the dogs reach, and out of hunger, the dog resorted to eating the owners flesh ?? No. 1
actonion Posted January 10 Posted January 10 21 hours ago, giddyup said: According to the television report the dog had been chained all it 's life, so much for "beloved pet". Plus the dog looked like it had a bad case of mange, so maybe abused as well. yes.so much for bloved pet and bhudda teachings 1
actonion Posted January 10 Posted January 10 17 hours ago, IvorBiggun2 said: I believed that until the other week. If the dog is in a condition that the vets knows there's no chance of recovery then they will euthanize. Probably round them up as they used to do in Pattaya, and take them to the Crocodile farm as live food ... 1
actonion Posted January 10 Posted January 10 3 hours ago, Thingamabob said: Not my point. Never mind Shoot the owner for mistreating the Dog, along with so many other owners who mistreat their dog's, by throwing them into the local Temple Car park or abandoning them on Motorway's +++ 2
Woke to Sounds of Horking Posted January 10 Posted January 10 On 1/8/2025 at 9:05 PM, Gottfrid said: That kind of explains it all. Uh... No. The dog had been chained over a prolonged period. Dog was rightfully angry. This might've been a case of neglect, abuse. Maybe the geezer got his comeuppance? 1 1
Woke to Sounds of Horking Posted January 10 Posted January 10 5 hours ago, Georgealbert said: The shelter’s team is committed to adhering to the Prevention of Animal Cruelty and Animal Welfare Act while ensuring the safety of the community. OK. Whatever you say.
Thingamabob Posted January 10 Posted January 10 37 minutes ago, actonion said: Shoot the owner for mistreating the Dog, along with so many other owners who mistreat their dog's, by throwing them into the local Temple Car park or abandoning them on Motorway's +++ Well said . 1
Gecko123 Posted January 10 Posted January 10 Pit bulls are a breed of dog which have a higher propensity for attacking people in comparison to other breeds, sometimes resulting in grievous injury or death. You can argue that if the animal is properly trained from birth that the chances of this happening are minimal, but the fact is that few of us are perfect pet owners, and even if every effort is made to properly train the dog, the risk never goes away 100%. In my opinion, when you consider the typical "utilitarian" approach many Thais take towards dog ownership, and couple this with the general lack of awareness of how dangerous pit bulls can be if not cared for or trained properly, I am 100% in favor of banning this breed in Thailand.
Thingamabob Posted January 10 Posted January 10 20 hours ago, JensenZ said: This is nonsense. He would not have been killed if it was a poodle no matter how bad the owners are. It's better to play it safe and ban these bad breeds. I don't see how the dog, on a short chain, could have done this. I understand there was a severely disturbed relative living in the same house. Maybe worth investigating.
Thingamabob Posted January 10 Posted January 10 6 minutes ago, Thingamabob said: Well said . I should add that, as I have said elsewhere, I don't think a dog on a short chain could have done this.
Thingamabob Posted January 10 Posted January 10 49 minutes ago, Woke to Sounds of Horking said: Uh... No. The dog had been chained over a prolonged period. Dog was rightfully angry. This might've been a case of neglect, abuse. Maybe the geezer got his comeuppance? Yes indeed, however I still don't understand how a dog on a short chain could have done this. There was a severely mentally disturbed relative living in the same house. Should be, at least, investigated.
Rampant Rabbit Posted January 10 Posted January 10 He was a lovely dog wouldnt hurt a fly, hoepfully hes been rehomed in a childrens orphanage as that would make sense in Thailand. Face it theres an awful lot of fukwits in Thailand especially when it comes to dogs. Definition fukwit. Anyone whose dog isnt on a lead
Rampant Rabbit Posted January 10 Posted January 10 54 minutes ago, actonion said: I dont believe there are bad Dogs, just bad owners Thats almost EVERY OWNER IN THAILAND, but correct
actonion Posted January 10 Posted January 10 1 hour ago, Rampant Rabbit said: Thats almost EVERY OWNER IN THAILAND, but correct I agree
proton Posted January 10 Posted January 10 On 1/9/2025 at 12:59 PM, MalcolmB said: The report spells it Ai Dum. No such thing as a bad dog breed, just bad owners. Not this idiotic myth again which comes up in every dog attack thread. There are many bad dog breeds with Pit Bulls at the top of the list for attacks and kills. Several breeds are bred for violence and are not suitable as pets, no matter what the owners are like. Wake up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now