Jump to content

Photos of destruction as a result of the incompetent world leader & his party


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Maga doesn't want to talk about climate change. So we get this kind of idiocy.

 

Idiocy?  Please explain how talking about climate change would have helped California.  Gavin Newsom talked a lot about it.  How did that go?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Pouatchee said:

 

known your threads for quite a while. funny... are you now pro-trump? You used to throw him out with the dish water... 

 

Absolutely not....one of my real concerns, politics aside is......whatever happened to role models???

 

He has to be the most horrendous example you could put forward to the human race of what boys might aspire to.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

The Spanish explorers called California the "Bay of Smoke" in 1542, so I hardly think the burning is anything new, and certainly not Trump's fault.

https://www.pbssocal.org/shows/lost-la/why-did-a-1542-spanish-voyage-refer-to-san-pedro-bay-as-the-bay-of-the-smoke

Nobody said it was new.

But as in Australia, Greece, Portugal, etc. things are now very much worse.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0ewe4p9128o

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Just for openers, empty reservoirs that should be full, insufficient numbers of firefighters, lack of a coordinated response. In other words. a general lack of competence. What has this got to do with the people you call MAGAs ?

 

Symptoms.

 

Fire department budget cut by $100 million.  Wacky environmental rules that prevent landowners from clearing dead trees, timber harvest is 10% of what it was 25 years ago, and state refusal to adequately clear undergrowth.

 

State regulations have created a tinderbox, therefore it's Trump's fault.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Maga doesn't want to talk about climate change. So we get this kind of idiocy.

 

 

What's the point, there is nothing we can do about it, it's natural not man made.

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

True, the burning is nothing new. What is different is the wind speed.

 

The strongest Santa Ana wind speed ever recorded was in December 2011, with an average wind speed of 156 km/hr, and gusts of up to 269 km/hr. The winds of the current fire were weaker, at a mere 100 km/hr, still faster than some people drive.

 

Given the convergence of fuel, house construction, dryness, and wind speed, there was nothing firefighters could do. Tripling staff, equipment and water supply would have ended the same way. P!ssing into the wind springs to mind.

 

How fast does the wind need to be before people acknowledge the climate is changing?

 

True, in this instance it's not Trump's fault. Neither is it the fault of Biden or Newsom.

 

In the broader picture, it IS Trump's fault. He's always been a climate denier, and has the same comprehension of science as an amoeba. That will carry over into his second term.

I thought you said it was shingle roofs, now it’s Trump. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

Sunday morning commentary.

 

LA is burning down.

 

People are extremely resistant to change.  At least some are.  Oftentimes they don't change until the pain not to is significantly greater than the pain to change.

 

Human nature?  Nah.  It's all in the schooling.

Tipp ,its All in the Main Stream Media constant leftest propaganda as well, many are activist  pretending to be 

journalists.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Counter intentional blame the democrats game disinformation from the Trump led maga cultists with FACTS.

 

 

Fact-checking criticism of California Democrats over fires

 

Rumors About LA Fire Department Budget Cuts Are Missing Context | Snopes.com

 

haha, bbc verify, so now they're a fact checking outlet, the bbc fact checking themselves?

 

i guess they're all scrambling to get control on the narratives not Zucker has banned the fake fact checkers from FB

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, proton said:

 

What's the point, there is nothing we can do about it, it's natural not man made.

Obviously, you know more than the 95% of scientists who agree global warming and climate change result from anthropomorphic emissions of carbon dioxide.

 

Please list the sources of your knowledge. Do you have a B Sc., M.Sc or Ph.D in any of the applicable fields, such as meteorology, climatology, oceanography, or thermodynamics?

 

Or are you an acolyte of social influencers, such as Alex Jones or Jordan Peterson?

 

What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

haha, bbc verify, so now they're a fact checking outlet, the bbc fact checking themselves?

 

i guess they're all scrambling to get control on the narratives not Zucker has banned the fake fact checkers from FB

The left is livid that Zuck reassigned his Fact Checkers !

I had dinner last night with a closet Netherlands liberal ,a dye in wool

Canadian liberal and a young French lad who brought up Le Pen , the NL & CA guys were besides themselves with 
hatred for Trump! They didnt even know the alternative would be a community note system!

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

True, the burning is nothing new. What is different is the wind speed.

 

The strongest Santa Ana wind speed ever recorded was in December 2011, with an average wind speed of 156 km/hr, and gusts of up to 269 km/hr. The winds of the current fire were weaker, at a mere 100 km/hr, still faster than some people drive.

 

I'm confused.

 

Global warming reduces the wind speed?

Posted
1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

But but Trump

FB_IMG_1736657273495.jpg

You got to wonder how far the Msm

are gonna investigate the legitimacy of Newsome’s independent analysis of the crisis!

They are so far up the butt of Newsome political narratives.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 1/10/2025 at 8:03 PM, riclag said:

Everything the dems touch they destroy . Progressives visions of control are radical , destructive and the proof is in the pictures in the OP.

 

2021 article explaining:
“How Democrats Ruin Everything: The New York Times”

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/how-democrats-ruin-everything-the-new-york-times/

I think you have a serious problem, especially for someone who doesn't live in the USA.....🤔

 

Or do you live in the USA, or is it just a crush on Biden or Harris and you got jilted........?

Posted
27 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Obviously, you know more than the 95% of scientists who agree global warming and climate change result from anthropomorphic emissions of carbon dioxide.

 

Please list the sources of your knowledge. Do you have a B Sc., M.Sc or Ph.D in any of the applicable fields, such as meteorology, climatology, oceanography, or thermodynamics?

 

Or are you an acolyte of social influencers, such as Alex Jones or Jordan Peterson?

 

What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

 

The 95% of scientists was debunked years ago. Co2 is just 0.04% of the atmosphere, of that 97% is natural the amount humans contribute makes zero difference to global warming

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...