1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That might just be his plan.

And im sure youd prefer bill gates or george soros gets to rule us then

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The kind of rightwing press misrepresentation of facts that plays well to those who don’t understand the second reading of a  Bill is not an opportunity to add amendments.

 

It is however the last opportunity to kill the Bill, which is precisely what Badenoch instructed her MPs to do:

 

 

Labour has a large majority the vote was  symbolic, I already gave you a link on this. It was done to keep the pressure up to get a new National Enquiry.

 

As for the continuing pressure.

 

Starmer open to U-turn on grooming gangs inquiry, Downing Street says

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-grooming-gangs-inquiry-badenoch-musk-b2675866.html

 

That's the headline, the article however:

 

Sir Keir’s spokesperson said they would “reject” claims it was a U-turn, instead saying the government was pursuing a “victims-first approach”.

 

How fortunate...........

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s trying to oust the leader of the UK’s elected Government.

 

Does it need to be more obvious than that?

Good, because communism ALWAYS fails the people.

31 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Did he really ? Have you got a link to that, seeing as you like to ask others for links.

 

Here is the reality from the BBC

 

 

Note who the head of  the CPS was, ultimately responsible for the decision not to proceed with the prosecution.

 

This guy brought the first prosecution

 

 

He told Starmer, the head of the CPS to wind his neck in and he was prosecuting.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2wvxx5qo

 

Starmer, as the Head of CPS and DPP, did not know that the CPS were prosecuting Sub Postmasters.

 

2 massive scandals that both Labour and  Starmer are neck deep in.

 

 

From your linked article:

 

“We have been unable to find any direct criticism of Sir Keir personally in any of the reports on the scandal, nor can we identify any suggestions that he himself made any decisions not to prosecute.”

38 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

And im sure youd prefer bill gates or george soros gets to rule us then

I wouldn’t, but that’s not stopping you imagining stuff.

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

Elon Musk's recent tweets on his social media platform, X, are reportedly under examination by the UK Government's counter-extremism officers. This intensified monitoring follows a series of inflammatory posts by Musk, the world's richest man, targeting the UK Government and its handling of grooming gangs. The Mirror reported that the Home Office unit is closely analyzing Musk's messages to assess the potential risks they pose to Britain.

Back in the days of newspaper barons like William Randolph Hearst, owners of media corporations would routinely write op-eds about a variety of issues including criticizing the actions or inactions of governments.
So the current brouhaha by the UK government is really a testament of the utter collapse of the Brit government into nascent totalitarianism.  Musk is simply reflecting the hypocrisy of the UK government which is literally covering up and explicitly condoning the crimes of people if they fit a certain class of "minorities" while throwing average UK citizens, especially if they are white Anglo citizens, into jail for pointing out the crimes and the government's hypocrisy and refusal to prosecute the crimes. Totalitarians "chill" the speech and actions of the public by threatening them with prison if they dare to speak out against criminal behavior which is condoned by that same government.  And the UK government is now dead-set on "chilling" the speech of the owner of one of the few free speech oriented media platforms that currently exist. 
Can you imagine a government going after William Randolph Hearst for his op-eds?  It's essentially what the UK government is attempting to do to Musk, as well as any other member of the public who dares criticizes the government's protection of sub-classes of criminals in their country.
Pedophiles, rapists, and grooming gangs are an unconscionably blight on society.  Any government official who condones that kind of criminality should be removed from power as they are complicit in the continuation of those criminal acts.

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

From your linked article:

 

“We have been unable to find any direct criticism of Sir Keir personally in any of the reports on the scandal, nor can we identify any suggestions that he himself made any decisions not to prosecute.”

 

The buck stops with the head of an Organisation.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Most hate and disinformation is spread by governments and their security forces.

Three biggest lies of all time:

 

1. (Obscene comment edited out)

2. I will still respect you in the morning

3. Im from the Government and Im here to help you.

8 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

The buck stops with the head of an Organisation.

From your linked article:

 

“That decision was overturned later by Nazir Afzal in 2011 after being appointed by Sir Keir as the CPS chief prosecutor for north-west England.”

 

If the buck stops at the head, then so does the credit.

 

You can’t have it both ways.

•  

Posted 8 hours ago

 

"Elon Musk's recent tweets on his social media platform, X, are reportedly under examination by the UK Government's counter-extremism officers."

 

Why don't they knock on his door a 2 am and arrest him, like they did with others that have posted on X and Facebook etc?????

I would very much like to see them try, they would get much more than they bargained for!......🤣

 

5 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

•  

 

Posted 8 hours ago

 

"Elon Musk's recent tweets on his social media platform, X, are reportedly under examination by the UK Government's counter-extremism officers."

 

Why don't they knock on his door a 2 am and arrest him, like they did with others that have posted on X and Facebook etc?????

I would very much like to see them try, they would get much more than they bargained for!......🤣

 

You do know he’s in the U.S., outside of UK jurisdiction?

8 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

•  

 

Posted 8 hours ago

 

"Elon Musk's recent tweets on his social media platform, X, are reportedly under examination by the UK Government's counter-extremism officers."

 

Why don't they knock on his door a 2 am and arrest him, like they did with others that have posted on X and Facebook etc?????

I would very much like to see them try, they would get much more than they bargained for!......🤣

 

 

I know he's wealthy, but he should still be looking to get his money back re: Ozempic.....it seems he got a dodgy batch.

 

So the UK police have time and resources to investigate Elon Musk posting on X, but they did not have time and resources to investigate the Pakistani muslim grooming gangs? In fact the covered it up and ignore it! Together with some MP's.

The 'cover up' is now all over social media and Elon must be thanked for helping it be exposed, again!

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You do know he’s in the U.S., outside of UK jurisdiction?

 

17 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

•  

 

Posted 8 hours ago

 

"Elon Musk's recent tweets on his social media platform, X, are reportedly under examination by the UK Government's counter-extremism officers."

 

Why don't they knock on his door a 2 am and arrest him, like they did with others that have posted on X and Facebook etc?????

I would very much like to see them try, they would get much more than they bargained for!......🤣

 

Yes indeed, they would be in for a very big surprise!

2 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

So the UK police have time and resources to investigate Elon Musk posting on X, but they did not have time and resources to investigate the Pakistani muslim grooming gangs? In fact the covered it up and ignore it! Together with some MP's.

The 'cover up' is now all over social media and Elon must be thanked for helping it be exposed, again!

 

You can relax.....it's not the police monitoring Musk's posts.

 

The Home Office’s counter-extremism unit, which is part of the Homeland Security Group, is monitoring Musk's posts and it is not part of the UK police force. It is a government department responsible for advising and supporting policies related to national security and counterterrorism, rather than direct law enforcement.

His attitude seems logical to me.

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You do know he’s in the U.S., outside of UK jurisdiction?

Sarcasm is not your forte?????

14 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

I know he's wealthy, but he should still be looking to get his money back re: Ozempic.....it seems he got a dodgy batch.

 

Yes, he is looking a bit 'chunky'..😆

2 hours ago, simon43 said:

It's definitely not a 'good look' when the failings and racism against white Brits by successive UK governments and local authorities have to be pointed out to them by a public figure living overseas....

Who in turn should keep his nose out of others countries business and concern himself with his adopted countries business.

 

AFAICS he, nor his business, is welcomed in the UK or the EU.

 

Being rich does NOT automatically allow you the right to interfere.

 

As my Mum used to tell me, some people have more money than sense.

11 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

You can relax.....it's not the police monitoring Musk's posts.

 

The Home Office’s counter-extremism unit, which is part of the Homeland Security Group, is monitoring Musk's posts and it is not part of the UK police force. It is a government department responsible for advising and supporting policies related to national security and counterterrorism, rather than direct law enforcement.

Fair enough, but my point remains valid. Time and resource are being spent on this molehill, whilst other important matters are ignored. Even if the counter extremism find 'something' there is not a fat lot they can do?

7 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Who in turn should keep his nose out of others countries business and concern himself with his adopted countries business.

 

AFAICS he, nor his business, is welcomed in the UK or the EU.

 

Being rich does NOT automatically allow you the right to interfere.

 

As my Mum used to tell me, some people have more money than sense.

You mean like Starmer keeping out of the US election?

4 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

You mean like Starmer keeping out of the US election?

 

Starmer could be lying of course....but none of the Labour activists were funded by the Labour movement and all went to the US of their own volition.

28 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Starmer could be lying of course....but none of the Labour activists were funded by the Labour movement and all went to the US of their own volition.

 

Holy Christ

 

Please tell me that you do not believe that this is true.

 

ETA

 

Actually, it probably is. Probably funded by Lord Alli, he appears to fund the whole Labour Cabinet.

1 minute ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Holy Christ

 

Please tell me that you do not believe that this is true.

 

They and other interested parties do it the world over....nothing unusual......it was only Mr Trump kicking off that gave it oxygen.

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

They and other interested parties do it the world over....nothing unusual..

 

If I take that at face value as being true, then Labour have no right to complain about anyone interfering in the UK.

3 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

If I take that at face value as being true, then Labour have no right to complain about anyone interfering in the UK.

 

I guess there is interference and then there is interference.

 

The difference being whether or not the interference stands any chance of being effective.........millions of Russian bots, millions of pounds......or a few enthusiasts looking to help out?

42 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

I guess there is interference and then there is interference.

 

Interference is interference

 

Just like sex pestery is sex pestery and Rape is rape, pregnancy is pregnancy and people are born male or female.*

 

* With the very few who are born Hermaphrodite.

 

Useful idiots try to blur the lines.

1 hour ago, mikeymike100 said:

You mean like Starmer keeping out of the US election?

False equivalence again.

 

The UK had an election, Musk doesn’t like the result and is now by his own admission acting to unseat the elected Government:

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/06/elon-musk-asks-if-us-should-liberate-britain.html

 

4 hours ago, Marcous said:

He's also offered to pony up $100 million to the party of his choosing - a bit of a stretch to call that freedom of speech.

 

And for that matter, he's been banning people on Twitter who disagree with him and tweaking the algorithm to boost those who do.

 

I'd go as far as to say it's a mass propaganda campaign simply because he has some beef with Starmer. 

 

 

Yes great...not nice being banned or having tweets reported when it's done to lefty wokey idiots..good on him

He's doing the same to German and France, but your algorythm he controls may not show that.