stevenl Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago It's coming, he just threatened sanctions. He just doesn't care.
transam Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 15 hours ago, frank83628 said: Remind me again why I am a traitor and to who exactly. You, a westerner, supporting a murdering tyrant that your country is trying to deal with. 😒 2
jvs Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 13 hours ago, jonbsails said: I agree with the gentleman who noted there is some history here, and American meddling. Nuland engineered a color revolution to oust a duly properly elected Yanukovitch, and put our guy in. Then the AZOV Battallion ( Real NAZIS) began a terror campaign slaughtering Russians in the east. They (Eastern Ukrain who were actually Russian)had even had the temerity to vote to join Russia...as they were...well....Russian The AZOV began killing Russians, torturing young Russian girls, raping them, so Putin went in to protect his people. So far estimates of the deaths are fckn ASTRONOMICAL! 600,000 dead each side give or take. This should have never happened. We had no business there. To top it all off, in 1962, we were teetering on the brink of war because the USSR put missiles in Cuba. I lived in Fla then. We had tank tracks on our asphalt roads for a decade after that. An agreement was reached in private that allowed both sides to save face. We agreed NEITHER side would EVER put military might, whether as themselves OR by proxy on one anothers doorsteps again. EVER! We have been violating that for 25 or so years now, slowly creeping closer to Russias border. If Ukraine joins NATO...that is the same as Russia owning Cuba and sending missiles into Key West. If Russia WANTED to, she could have just waltzed through Ukraine. But all Russia wanted was to keep Crimea, and stop NAZIS from killing Russians in the east Ukraine. In case no one remembers, Russia lost about 10 MILLION Russians to the NAZI war machine, and without Russia as an ally, we would all be speaking German now. So Russia is not fond of NAZIS at all. Demonize Russia all you want.... fckn warmongers I HATE! ALWAYS send others to fight. Always send the money to be laundered back. Crooked politricians. I am SICK of the corruption. Biden on camera BRAGGING about ousting the Detective who was closing in on Hunters crimes, and got him fired. "and put someone SOLID in there" scumbag. BRAGGING about the corruption...and the audience APPLAUDED!!! Well since you like history you should get your facts straight,if it wasn't for Germany you would still be paying taxes to the UK. All depends how far you want to go back,lets just deal with the now because that is the only thing that is important! I hope you are happy with the new guy in the White house. 1
jas007 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago There''s a new twist on any possible deal with Putin to stop the war. He wants the USA to extradite Fauci to Russia for "crimes against humanity." Funny, and I wish it would happen, but it's highly unlikely, legally. 2
jvs Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 28 minutes ago, jas007 said: Inasmuch as the war is all but over, I've more or less stopped paying attention to it. Unless I'm mistaken, didn't Putin recently voice his disapproval of any type of "ceasefire"? The rationale being that a ceasefire would simply give Ukraine breathing room and time to restock its supplies. In other words, counterproductive for Russia. Anyway, unless the Neocon warmongers get to Trump, I think what'll happen is that the money flowing to Zelensky stops. At least the money from the USA will stop. Why pour money down the drain? The European leaders talk a lot, but their countries are all broke and/or on the verge of economic collapse, so I can't see them stepping up to fund a losing proposition. Once Zelensky sees reality, he'll cut a deal. Russia will get whatever land it then occupies and a guarantee of no NATO for Ukraine, ever. The Ukraine will get to keep the land they occupy now? Russia is doing so well they need help from NK? What a laugh. Why pour money down the drain? Better to funnel it to the few rich people right? 1 1
frank83628 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 12 minutes ago, transam said: You, a westerner, supporting a murdering tyrant that your country is trying to deal with. 😒 My country? I believe your previous leader BoJo continued this was by shipping peace talk in April 2022 2
Popular Post Hawaiian Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago 14 hours ago, jonbsails said: If Russia WANTED to, she could have just waltzed through Ukraine. Do you really believe that? Why did it take so long for Russia to bring in North Korean troops? I would say because they haven't been able to accomplish what they initially set out to do. A real sign of desperation and quite an embarrassment for Putin. 2 4
Popular Post Hawaiian Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, frank83628 said: I have not seen any proof that NK soldiers are even there. Only the usual western propaganda outlets saying it None so blind as those who will not see. 2 4
Popular Post jvs Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago 8 minutes ago, frank83628 said: I have not seen any proof that NK soldiers are even there. Only the usual western propaganda outlets saying it If i send you video and other proof will you accept that? Or just keep ignoring the truth? Saying it is Western propaganda? Please let me know what news channel you accept as telling the truth? 3
frank83628 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Hawaiian said: None so blind as those who will not see. Show me some actual proof. I didn't watch RT for a while but didn't see any mention there either 1 1
Neeranam Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago let them fight it out, nothing to do with my country 2
Neeranam Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Donald can see a conman, unlike Sleepy Joe. Zelenskie is going to have to surrender soon. 2
Popular Post Hawaiian Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago 17 minutes ago, frank83628 said: Show me some actual proof. I didn't watch RT for a while but didn't see any mention there either 34 minutes ago, frank83628 said: I have not seen any proof that NK soldiers are even there. Only the usual western propaganda outlets saying it Why do think that RT is not Russian propaganda? The best proof for you is to actually go there and see for yourself. 1 2
frank83628 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Hawaiian said: Why do think that RT is not Russian propaganda? The best proof for you is to actually go there and see for yourself. I never said it wasn't, but it shows the Russian side of the story. And no mention there Uf you feel so strongly..Why don't you go and do your bit for the west too. 1
Neeranam Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, frank83628 said: I never said it wasn't, but it shows the Russian side of the story. And no mention there Uf you feel so strongly..Why don't you go and do your bit for the west too. This war has nothing to do with Yanks.
frank83628 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Neeranam said: This war has nothing to do with Yanks. Really, sonwhy have they sent 150b to Ukrainie? 1
Neeranam Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, frank83628 said: Really, sonwhy have they sent 150b to Ukrainie? No idea, maybe the Ukranian lobby? Probably something to do with oil. Never saw them helping Tibet when they were invade by China. 1
frank83628 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Neeranam said: No idea, maybe the Ukranian lobby? Probably something to do with oil. Never saw them helping Tibet when they were invade by China. Or 12 trillion in minerals
Popular Post Hamus Yaigh Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago 18 hours ago, jas007 said: I think you're conveniently ignoring the history of the region and especially the history of USA meddling around the world to install puppet dictators by way or "regime change." It's a Neocon fantasy that finally met its match. Russia isn't some puny third world country that can be pushed around. Russia has very legitimate security interests. It has a "sphere of influence." It doesn't want NATO missiles on its border, and rightly so. The USA wouldn't tolerate Chinese or Russia missile installations in Tijuana. Why should Russia tolerate NATO forces on their border? Do you have any idea how many Russians lost their lives in WW II? What was it? 21 million people? You can pretend it's all about the invasion of a "sovereign country," but it's more than that. Whilst you bring up some valid points about the historical context of the conflict and Russia's legitimate security interests, you fail to acknowledge the core issue of Russia’s blatant violation of international law and Ukraine’s sovereignty. Yes, Russia suffered massive casualties during World War II, and yes, Russia has legitimate security concerns. But that does not give them the right to invade and annex a sovereign nation, no matter how sympathetic their motivations might seem. In essence, your response tries to justify an illegal invasion by appealing to history and Russia’s fears. 1 1 2
papa al Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 17 hours ago, transam said: And you, your Putin handlers handbook...........😒 is the handbook available online./
jas007 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said: In essence, your response tries to justify an illegal invasion by appealing to history and Russia’s fears. Even if you assume the invasion was "illegal," it did happen. Was I trying to "justify" it? I was trying to explain the situation in the context of history. There's a difference. At this point, justification won't change anything. It would help, though, if the actors would recognize reality. And the reality is that the war is continuing, thousands continue to die, billions are being spent, and what's done can't be undone. Russia has a legitimate security interest at stake. It sees NATO missiles on its doorstep as an existential threat. To expect that they will not act in their own best interest is a fantasy. Going on and on about Ukrainian sovereignty and how the invasion was "illegal" is a distraction. The world isn't the perfect place some would like us to believe. International law works until it doesn't. Take a look at the UN. People like to think that it performs a useful function, and it does, to a point. And then it's useless. Nation states act in what they perceive to be their own best interests once that line is crossed. 1 2
transam Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, frank83628 said: My country? I believe your previous leader BoJo continued this was by shipping peace talk in April 2022 Don't be silly.......🙄
bannork Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, frank83628 said: I have not seen any proof that NK soldiers are even there. Only the usual western propaganda outlets saying it "About 1,000 North Koreans killed fighting Ukraine in Kursk, officials say - BBC News" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c87djeezjxeo 1
transam Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 18 minutes ago, papa al said: is the handbook available online./ Ask Franky............😉 1
transam Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, frank83628 said: I have not seen any proof that NK soldiers are even there. Only the usual western propaganda outlets saying it Honestly, you do come across as being quite dim..............😬 Watch this, words from a sensible chap, though I doubt you will understand a single word............🤨 1
transam Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, jvs said: If i send you video and other proof will you accept that? Or just keep ignoring the truth? Saying it is Western propaganda? Please let me know what news channel you accept as telling the truth? You'll be lucky, he may get shot by his handler.............😂 2
frank83628 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, bannork said: "About 1,000 North Koreans killed fighting Ukraine in Kursk, officials say - BBC News" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c87djeezjxeo I saw that, but anonymous 'officials' said Putin was losing the war, Russian losses were 500k,and they military was depleated... so slighly skeptical on western reports 2 1
transam Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, frank83628 said: I saw that, but anonymous 'officials' said Putin was losing the war, Russian losses were 500k,and they military was depleated... so slighly skeptical on western reports But not sceptical about Putin's reports................😂 You can't make this sh_t up.........😆................... 1 1
frank83628 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 31 minutes ago, transam said: Honestly, you do come across as being quite dim..............😬 Watch this, words from a sensible chap, though I doubt you will understand a single word............🤨 People should make their minds up You know that old saying, if you tell lies you need a good memory.
transam Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, frank83628 said: People should make their minds up You know that old saying, if you tell lies you need a good memory. And.............? It doesn't change the fact that you are traitorous, just because you have some Russian blood...... So, if you had German blood you would support Hitler...........Sad fellow.... 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now