Jump to content

Thai airline flight makes emergency landing in Phuket


Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder how the passengers were even aware of this issue? It does not sound like anyone was ever in much danger. Perhaps the engine caught on fire, or was blowing out alot of smoke, easily visible to passengers? 

 

Glad everyone arrived safely. 

Posted

Not sure where it came from, possibly Bangkok,  but to run out of fuel on approach is bad calculation by the ground staff.

 

Next time....more fuel.  

  • Confused 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, DUNROAMIN said:

No mention of what airline and more importantly what aircraft?

Indeed , no mention. Must be Boeing again. Flying coffins.

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

I wonder how the passengers were even aware of this issue? It does not sound like anyone was ever in much danger. Perhaps the engine caught on fire, or was blowing out alot of smoke, easily visible to passengers? 

 

Glad everyone arrived safely. 

Maybe they didn´t see any propeller anymore?  😉😉

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, diveasia666 said:

Surprised it doesn't happen more often after chapter 11 and minimal maintenance to cut costs.

 

There is no "Chapter 11" in Thailand. Thai bankruptcy rules and procedures are different than those of the USA. 

 How do you know there was minimal maintenance? The airline would not be able to fly to EU, Taiwan,Singapore  or Japanese airports without international standard certification. I would expect that other countries would require the certification too.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, wensiensheng said:

Thai airline is mentioned several times, as in Thai airways.

 

"Thai airline" could describe any of the several Thailand-registered carriers, hence the confusion. "Thai Airways" is never mentioned in the article.

  • Agree 2
Posted

It was on approach to Phuket... It wasn't forced to land in Phuket. It has 2 engines. Those planes are engineered to fly on 1 engine when necessary. 

Posted
1 hour ago, steven100 said:

Not sure where it came from, possibly Bangkok,  but to run out of fuel on approach is bad calculation by the ground staff.

 

Next time....more fuel.  

 Airport pump attendents are low paying jobs maybe! 

Posted
16 hours ago, JoePai said:

Do TG planes not come with 2 engines these days ?

and did the flight to Phuket make an "emergency" landing at any other airport other than its actual destination? Another storm in a teacup or trouble underneath the coconut shell of Thailand.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

This is another example of why we need only the best and most qualified pilots to fly these airplanes.  Well done!

I am still waiting for the expert opinion from Chairman Orange as he has become a world famous aviation expert. Was the crew 100% Thai and no DEI included🤭?

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
18 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

The Pinnacle Gazette

What ChatGPT has to say about this site :

 

The Pinnacle Gazette is a digital news platform established by Tree of Evolution LLC, offering coverage across various topics such as science, technology, current events, art, and sports. According to its Terms of Use, the platform utilizes advanced multi-agent, multi-layered AI technologies to generate and curate content. This suggests that the articles are primarily produced by artificial intelligence systems.

 

While the site presents itself as a comprehensive news source, the reliance on AI-generated content raises questions about the authenticity and reliability of the information provided. It's important to approach such platforms with caution, as AI-generated news may lack the depth, context, and critical analysis typically offered by human journalists.

 

In summary, The Pinnacle Gazette is a digital platform that delivers AI-generated news content. Given the nature of its content creation, it's advisable to cross-reference information from this site with other reputable news sources to ensure accuracy and comprehensiveness.

Posted

They do not say whether there is an investigation by the aircraft manufacturer and what brand the aircraft is. Airbus ? Boeing ?

Posted
14 hours ago, LivinginKata said:

Modern jets can easily fly and land on one engine.

 

That is the meaning of the plural engines, isn't it?

Already at the time of WW2, some B-17 bombers came back alive to the base in UK on single engine(3 others destroyed during air-to-air combat over Nazi air space).

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, FlorC said:

Indeed , no mention. Must be Boeing again. Flying coffins.

 

20 minutes ago, daejung said:

They do not say whether there is an investigation by the aircraft manufacturer and what brand the aircraft is. Airbus ? Boeing ?


You are aware that neither Airbus nor Boeing actually manufacture the engines that sit on their airframes ?

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, daejung said:

They do not say whether there is an investigation by the aircraft manufacturer and what brand the aircraft is. Airbus ? Boeing ?

Does it not strike you as odd this story about a 'Thai airline' only appears on a Turkish web site? It's AI generated garbage - who knows if a single word of it is true.

  • Agree 1
Posted

An off topic post has been removed

"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!"

Arnold Judas Rimmer of Jupiter Mining Corporation Ship Red Dwarf

Posted
16 hours ago, chickenslegs said:

In such circumstances does the pilot announce that an engine has failed? I would have thought it better to just get on and land the plane without scaring the passengers.

Normal part of the procedure to inform the passenger about emergency landing, fasten seat bealts and to take their emergency landing position. 

 

Do you want your neighbour next to you  take you out if landing goes wrong? 

Posted
9 hours ago, hotchilli said:

 

On-point of take off it can become more problematic.

 

This is a valid and correct point.  As a pilot, I was interested in putting it into context.

As you probably know, pilots like to talk in V-speeds.  In this scenario we will use V1, Vr and V2.

 

V1 is the take-off commit speed (typically because there isn't enough runway remaining to stop, that sort of thing...)

Vr is the speed that rotation commences (rotation is when the nosewheel lifts off the runway but the main wheels are still in contact with the runway)

V2 is the safe minimum take-off speed.  A multi-engine airliner can continue the take-off and climb if an engine fails at or above this speed.

 

I'll use an Airbus A320 for this example, s a typical popular airliner:

 

- V1 is between 130-150 knots (dependent on aircraft weight, weather and runway conditions)

- Vr is between 135 and 155 knots (dependencies as above)

- V2 is between 140 and 160 knots.

 

Unsurprisingly, each of these events occur in sequence - V1, Vr then V2.

 

The bottom line is that there is typically 10 knots difference between V1 (there's no turning back) and V2 (we're OK to continue).  In an A320, this typically takes one second.

 

So, next time you're hurtling down the runway and the nose starts to rise, you might hold your breath.  When you feel the rumbling of the main wheels on the runway stop because you have become airborne, you can breath again (you might loudly proclaim "Thank God!" but this might confuse your fellow passengers).

 

I hope this helps. 🙂

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...