mikeymike100 Posted March 1 Posted March 1 14 minutes ago, JulesMad said: You have a completely mentally disturbed 'president' (also convicted criminal!) running around with nuclear arms, do you call that normal?!? Maybe in america, yes, but not in the real world! Here we go with a deflection. Tut tut....What a ludicrous comment. President Trump is not mentally disturbed, or do you have hard evidence he is? He is not running around with nuclear arms, there are extremely tight controls, as there should be, on nuclear arms, even the President cannot unilaterally fire them, unlike a person with gender dysphoria, firing a gun! 1 1
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted March 1 Popular Post Posted March 1 Just now, rudi49jr said: Aside from the question if trans troops make good ‘soldiers’: an army needs much more than just the gung-ho warrior type of men. They need good administrators, engineers, cooks, IT-people, maintenance people, and so on and so forth. A good army can not function properly without a good backbone like this. So why wouldn’t trans troops be qualified to fulfill these kinds of jobs in the army? Transgenders should be allowed into the army so they can cook the food and clean the rooms ? 3
wavodavo Posted March 1 Posted March 1 4 hours ago, Gsxrnz said: Lipstick and eyeliner sales at the PX stores will suffer a dramatic decline. what about womens sanitary pads.
Yellowtail Posted March 1 Posted March 1 3 minutes ago, rudi49jr said: Aside from the question if trans troops make good ‘soldiers’: an army needs much more than just the gung-ho warrior type of men. They need good administrators, engineers, cooks, IT-people, maintenance people, and so on and so forth. A good army can not function properly without a good backbone like this. So why wouldn’t trans troops be qualified to fulfill these kinds of jobs in the army? Because the additional expense related to their gender surgeries and medications make them too expensive. The military does not take diabetics either. 1
digger70 Posted March 1 Posted March 1 6 hours ago, soalbundy said: She looks ****ing awful. Not a She ,It's a Wannabe. ( Wannabe something that I ain't)
KhunLA Posted March 1 Posted March 1 Not sure I'd want to share a fox hole with a mentally unstable person. A man, thinking he's a woman, or, vise versa, just ain't playing with a full deck. What other imaginary things might they be thinking when the enemy attacks
thaibeachlovers Posted March 1 Posted March 1 8 hours ago, RuamRudy said: So why not discipline them in respect to their fitness level, and apply that same criteria to all service personnel? I have absolutely no idea what that post means. In the military, recruits have to conform to the requirements- the requirements are not varied to suit individuals. It's not called the green machine for no reason.
thaibeachlovers Posted March 1 Posted March 1 3 hours ago, KhunLA said: Not sure I'd want to share a fox hole with a mentally unstable person. A man, thinking he's a woman, or, vise versa, just ain't playing with a full deck. What other imaginary things might they be thinking when the enemy attacks I doubt that sort of person even gets to be in a foxhole/ trench/ front line. More likely to be a dishwasher or cleaner rear echelon type. The military also needs clerks, cooks and waiters in the officers mess. 2
KhunLA Posted March 1 Posted March 1 3 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: I doubt that sort of person even gets to be in a foxhole/ trench/ front line. More likely to be a dishwasher or cleaner rear echelon type. The military also needs clerks, cooks and waiters in the officers mess. With their mental illness, they may be serving Beyond Burger and think it's Beef My plants identify as animals 😎
soalbundy Posted March 1 Posted March 1 8 hours ago, RuamRudy said: So why not discipline them in respect to their fitness level, and apply that same criteria to all service personnel? Why not just throw them out?
KhunLA Posted March 1 Posted March 1 10 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: I have absolutely no idea what that post means. In the military, recruits have to conform to the requirements- the requirements are not varied to suit individuals. It's not called the green machine for no reason. Means a trans woman, may not be as physically fit to serve, if stating he's a man, since training requirements aren't always the same. Again, not sure I would want to be on the front lines, with less physically able person. If injured, will he be able to carry, assist me back to medical care. To serve as a trans woman in US military, the must transition ... BUT ... that does not require sex reassignment surgery. Simply living as a woman, and you get to train as a women. Less physical training then men. Hence the problem. Same as competing against women. If you can't 'qualify' as a men, just say you're a woman. NO THANKS ... prefer not to have my life depend on you on the front lines, combat zone.
stevenl Posted March 1 Posted March 1 50 minutes ago, KhunLA said: Means a trans woman, may not be as physically fit to serve, if stating he's a man, since training requirements aren't always the same. Again, not sure I would want to be on the front lines, with less physically able person. If injured, will he be able to carry, assist me back to medical care. To serve as a trans woman in US military, the must transition ... BUT ... that does not require sex reassignment surgery. Simply living as a woman, and you get to train as a women. Less physical training then men. Hence the problem. Same as competing against women. If you can't 'qualify' as a men, just say you're a woman. NO THANKS ... prefer not to have my life depend on you on the front lines, combat zone. So you wouldn't want to serve with women. Sounds like you're the kind of guy who also doesn't want to shower with gays after sports. 1
Jingthing Posted March 1 Posted March 1 With maga, cruelty is the point. A particular trans soldier could be in the top tier of soldiers, but these vicious hateful scapegoating bigots don't care about such things that really matter. 3 2
Yellowtail Posted March 1 Posted March 1 12 minutes ago, Jingthing said: With maga, cruelty is the point. A particular trans soldier could be in the top tier of soldiers, but these vicious hateful scapegoating bigots don't care about such things that really matter. Link to the particular trans soldier please. 1 1
Harrisfan Posted March 1 Posted March 1 11 hours ago, soalbundy said: She looks ****ing awful. Looks like the average guy in Pattaya 1
JimGant Posted March 1 Posted March 1 11 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: Women should never be allowed to be in combat unless they can pass the same physical requirements that men have to meet. I always had mixed feeling about the obvious lesbians I encountered in the military. They, with their androgynous features, short hair, gruff demeanor -- were a real detriment to the military image. And "don't ask, don't tell" was a joke regarding them -- you certainly didn't have to ask. But, hey, maybe as desert fighters they might excel -- at least during certain times during the month, when they retain water.
KhunLA Posted March 1 Posted March 1 1 hour ago, stevenl said: So you wouldn't want to serve with women. Sounds like you're the kind of guy who also doesn't want to shower with gays after sports. Woman in combat ... no Serve with, yes, but not in combat. Don't know a whole lot of woman that could carry me. At least to, out of harm's way. When in military, women were not allowed in combat zones. Changed in 2016, for ground combat. Shower with men ... no If I'm showering with another person, we're probably having sex, or prelude to. Not saying haven't been without clothes, with other people, men and or women in different settings, in younger days. And not so younger days, just before TH. Drunken parties, out in nature, 3-somes or whatever. No desire lately, well, while in a relationship, and not since in Thailand.
JonnyF Posted March 1 Posted March 1 13 hours ago, klauskunkel said: she looks pregnant... Russian and Chinese soldiers must be quaking in their boots at the prospect of facing this killing machine. This bloke embodies western weakness under woke culture. A total embarrassment. Self loathing white Liberals love to denigrate the west and what better tool to use than something like this to represent the US military? Well done Mr Trump. Get them out. 1
Lacessit Posted March 1 Posted March 1 Women served in combat during WW I and WWII. Most notably in Russia, as pilots and snipers. Woman can serve in armies in the USA, Canada, Australia and Israel. Woman are not as strong as men. However, they can endure extremes of heat and cold better than men. The existence of female warriors in ancient cultures such as Scythia and Sarmatia has been noted by historians. It's where the Amazon legend originated. Strength is not necessary when operating a high tech drone from hundreds of kilometres away. The transgender ban looks to me like just another example of Trump bigotry. Who cares what your sex is, as long as you can fight or give support to troops in the field? A lot of misogynistic rubbish on this thread. 2
Yellowtail Posted March 1 Posted March 1 2 minutes ago, Lacessit said: Women served in combat during WW I and WWII. Most notably in Russia, as pilots and snipers. Woman can serve in armies in the USA, Canada, Australia and Israel. Woman are not as strong as men. However, they can endure extremes of heat and cold better than men. The existence of female warriors in ancient cultures such as Scythia and Sarmatia has been noted by historians. It's where the Amazon legend originated. Strength is not necessary when operating a high tech drone from hundreds of kilometres away. The transgender ban looks to me like just another example of Trump bigotry. Who cares what your sex is, as long as you can fight or give support to troops in the field? A lot of misogynistic rubbish on this thread. Trans people were joining the military to get trans surgeries and medications, which the taxpayers would have to fund for life. And, given their medical condition, they are excluded from combat. The military does not allow diabetics in the military, why should it allow people that "require" gender surgeries and medications for life? 1 1
Luuk Chaai Posted March 1 Posted March 1 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/A3IAAOSw0edkh25b/s-l1200.jpgWay ahead of the times
Harrisfan Posted March 1 Posted March 1 14 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Trans people were joining the military to get trans surgeries and medications, which the taxpayers would have to fund for life. And, given their medical condition, they are excluded from combat. The military does not allow diabetics in the military, why should it allow people that "require" gender surgeries and medications for life? Lefties never consider the real reasons. Always playing bigot cards. All they have. 1
Harrisfan Posted March 1 Posted March 1 25 minutes ago, Lacessit said: Women served in combat during WW I and WWII. Most notably in Russia, as pilots and snipers. Woman can serve in armies in the USA, Canada, Australia and Israel. Woman are not as strong as men. However, they can endure extremes of heat and cold better than men. The existence of female warriors in ancient cultures such as Scythia and Sarmatia has been noted by historians. It's where the Amazon legend originated. Strength is not necessary when operating a high tech drone from hundreds of kilometres away. The transgender ban looks to me like just another example of Trump bigotry. Who cares what your sex is, as long as you can fight or give support to troops in the field? A lot of misogynistic rubbish on this thread. https://www.military.com/join-armed-forces/disqualifiers-medical-conditions.html Long list. If a man can't decide his gender a war zone is no place for him.
thaibeachlovers Posted March 1 Posted March 1 8 hours ago, stevenl said: So you wouldn't want to serve with women. Sounds like you're the kind of guy who also doesn't want to shower with gays after sports. I certainly wouldn't want to serve on the battlefield with females. front line troops need to depend 100% on their companions, and not suffering from PMT or such like. As a medic I did a training course with females and they were pretty useless in the field. Took 10 minutes to get dressed when the "enemy" was attacking in the middle of the night. Some of them didn't even want to do what they were told to by an NCO. At the after course party, they were all over the instructors like a rash- I never saw sex appeal blatantly used like that before.
Purdey Posted Tuesday at 05:49 AM Posted Tuesday at 05:49 AM Perhaps the military could consider employing people based on merit. What a wonderful idea! Pass the exercises and drills and stay. Puffed? Go.
p414 Posted Friday at 12:29 PM Posted Friday at 12:29 PM On 2/28/2025 at 10:47 PM, thaibeachlovers said: Are we seriously expected to believe s/he is capable of the minimum standards of fitness required to serve. In the military I served in we had to pass a fitness test every year. One of those tests was carrying another serviceman for a distance- I defy most normal men the ability to carry him/ her any distance at all. Looks like his/ her speciality is in relation to consuming as much food as possible. Capable of an 8 mile run in full battle gear? Around 1980 driving from Folkestone to London around 1am on the A .20 ,I had just entered the road where there was no street lighting..I saw a man in soldiers uniform carrying a large trunk on his shoulder and marching on..He was not thumbing for a lift but I stopped and asked where he was going....He had just come off the ferry and going to Ashford..I said I can take you there..I opened my boot and tried to lift one end of his large trunk...I could hardly ;lift it...I drove him to his family home on the far outskirts of Ashford..a journey of more than 10 miles...No female or man dressed as one could have done what this Soldier was going to do by himself.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now