Jump to content

China’s Imminent Invasion of Taiwan: A Global Catastrophe in the Making


Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Correct.  Matter of fact, Taiwan gets their 'minerals', rare earth elements for the chips, from ...

 

... China.   CN doesn't have to invade to control and part of 'One China', as simply need to limit their ability to have an economy.   Want to really squeeze them, blockade imports.  It is an island, with little needed that isn't imported ... food for example :cheesy:

 

Taiwan relies on imports for almost all it's food & energy.

 

Over 180 countries do NOT even recognized Taiwan as an independent country.  Only 12 do.

 

But the MSM will have you believe .... yea, dream on :coffee1:

 

China & Taiwan have existed in harmony for decades.   Only MSM wants to rock the boat, but reporting BS.   Just another distraction while the puppeteers steal you money & assets.

 

The Feudal Serfdom system will be returning to the West, as long as you keep fighting amongst yourselves.   You can fix stupid.

The problem with you being right, is that all that new navy isn't just to play war games. Sooooo, which vulnerable countries in the backside of the planet may be having a visit? Perhaps I should be learning Mandarin, at least enough to say "welcome new overlords".

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

You are overlooking the American military's secret weapon: DIVERSITY! With ladyboys in its military, the US can now defeat any non-diverse adversary. All they need to do is to make sure their enemies are wearing gold chains.

Not anymore.  The halcyon days of men suffering from "gender dysphoria" and dressing up as ladies just ended.  Corporal Klinger could actually get his discharge in today's US military. Trump and Pete Hegseth just put an end to transvestites and transsexuals in the US military. They are being processed out as I write. 

 

02a3550fc159df061991c0c20b75a7e0-3395323775.jpg

Posted

China has a massive weak spot: Three Gorges and other large dams. It should be made clear to them that these industrial/military dual use sites are on the target list in case of an invasion of Taiwan.

Posted
24 minutes ago, John Drake said:

China has a massive weak spot: Three Gorges and other large dams. It should be made clear to them that these industrial/military dual use sites are on the target list in case of an invasion of Taiwan.

Just to be Captain Obvious, but it is 2025, and in this day an age of hyper-sonic weapons, oceans don't matter.
My guess is that there are reciprocal targets in all 50 states.  And "invade Taiwan?"  How do you invade your own territory? 
If China made the same overtures to assist a US state to secede and insist that "There will be consequence if the US attempts to invade <pick a state>.  No reason to say anymore - it just wouldn't happen and for the exact same reasons. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, connda said:

Just to be Captain Obvious, but it is 2025, and in this day an age of hyper-sonic weapons, oceans don't matter.
My guess is that there are reciprocal targets in all 50 states.  And "invade Taiwan?"  How do you invade your own territory? 
If China made the same overtures to assist a US state to secede and insist that "There will be consequence if the US attempts to invade <pick a state>.  No reason to say anymore - it just wouldn't happen and for the exact same reasons. 

 

Who is talking about the US? I am talking about a retaliatory strike from Taiwan that takes out Three Gorges. https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/kills-tens-of-millions-taiwans-chilling-message-for-china/news-story/820c97614a7452299f068fac99d71eb6

Posted

I don't think the Chinese are that stupid. They know it would be the end of most everyone. They know if no one intervened, the least that would happen would be a total collapse of their economy when all nations but places like N. Korea stop trade.

They are only trying to save face by the shows of force.  And in Asia, saving face is more important than anything. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, PeterA said:

I don't think the Chinese are that stupid. They know it would be the end of most everyone. They know if no one intervened, the least that would happen would be a total collapse of their economy when all nations but places like N. Korea stop trade.

They are only trying to save face by the shows of force.  And in Asia, saving face is more important than anything. 

I'm not so sure South American and African countries would cease trading with China. And I'm sure that Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Myanmar, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and Singapore would continue as though nothing had happened. The question is: does the US intervene and blockade/sink every cargo and tanker going to and from China? How much has Russia to China pipelines foreseen and prepared for this scenario? 

Posted
5 hours ago, blaze master said:

 

If you say so.

 

Did you miss  "The Israel Defense Forces said its Oct. 26 raid knocked out Iranian missile factories and air defences in three waves of strikes. Researchers said that based on satellite imagery, targets included buildings once used in Iran's nuclear programme."

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israels-strikes-iran-spark-interest-air-launched-ballistic-missiles-2024-11-04/

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Did you miss  "The Israel Defense Forces said its Oct. 26 raid knocked out Iranian missile factories and air defences in three waves of strikes. Researchers said that based on satellite imagery, targets included buildings once used in Iran's nuclear programme."

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israels-strikes-iran-spark-interest-air-launched-ballistic-missiles-2024-11-04/

 

 

You're missing the point but carry on. 

Posted

It is ridiculous for China to attack Taiwan. At present, China can survive because it has economic power over other countries. If China attacks, Taiwan and China will collapse.

Posted

With over 30,000 Israeli soldiers in Thailand, not including US troops embedded in Vietnam and Thailand, if China attacks Taiwan, the US will definitely attack China's back door from the China-Laos high-speed railway.

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, CanadaSam said:

Whether or not his debacle with Zelensky was simply to strong-arm them to signing a deal for minerals, with giving away Ukrainian land to the Russki's for a permanent cease-fire, remains to be seen, as it did not materialize.  Whether or not he has the kohona's to stick up to the protection treaties with Taiwan and Phillipines has still to be known.  I dunno.  Waiting and watching.

Real Politik Bismarck Kissinger Nixon Trump

 

Thank God - a return to Real Politik ala Bismarck & Kissinger.  
Personal experience here in Thailand making our advisory efforts difficult :  The unreliable & arrogant Obama /Kerry SecState (idiotic idealistic A-Holes) policy of pausing Security Assistance programs with Thailand only succeeded in turning the Thai's toward the CCP (e.g., potential Thai purchase of /involvement in an unnecessary, expensive & blackmail threatening CCP-Thai submarine program).
 
Twentieth century world politics saw the United States combine ideological abstractions with balance of power realities. President Woodrow Wilson sought to transform the geopolitical clash of the Grea
www.realcleardefense.com
 
Quote: "Trump appears to be channeling Richard Nixon, who during his presidency deemphasized ideology and prioritized the balance of power in conducting foreign policy. Nixon’s masterstroke was triangular diplomacy, which exploited the Sino-Soviet split to America’s geopolitical advantage. Henry Kissinger was right in the third volume of his magnificent memoirs, Years of Renewal, when he claimed that Nixon set the stage for Reagan’s victory in the Cold War. And Nixon did that by abandoning ideology in favor of the balance of power. Trump’s policy of negotiating an imperfect end to the Ukraine war and refusing to condemn Russia at the United Nations resembles Nixon’s negotiation of the imperfect end to the Vietnam War and his embrace of a de facto alliance with Communist China. Trump, like Nixon, is playing the long, crucial game of balance of power geopolitics instead of leaning on ideological abstractions like “democracy versus autocracy.”
Nixon’s long game was designed to shift the balance of power against the Soviet empire. Trump’s long game is to shift the balance of power against Communist China. Trump, like Nixon, is following the geopolitical playbook of Walter Lippmann, the influential American journalist who understood, even in the age of ideology, the overriding importance of the balance of power to global peace and stability.

 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, candide said:

Taiwan should not worry

 Everybody knows now that the U.S. is an ally which can be trusted! :laugh:

 

If you were Taiwan who would you call first to ask for help ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...