Jump to content

U.S. Rejects Thai Claims on Lack of Uyghur Resettlement Offers


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, webfact said:

A US State Department representative stated that the US had persistently proposed resettlement solutions for the Uyghurs, involving various countries

Haiti?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, webfact said:

A US State Department representative stated that the US had persistently proposed resettlement solutions for the Uyghurs, involving various countries, including possible resettlement within the United States.

 

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand's vice minister for foreign affairs, labelled the third-country offers as "unrealistic,"

The Thai POV seems more plausible and less hypocritical than the US State Depts in today's toxic world politics.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 5
Posted
7 hours ago, webfact said:

labelled the third-country offers as "unrealistic," expressing concerns about potential repercussions from China that might affect Thailand's economy.

The bottom line. Always the bottom line.

I'm sure that must be the major concern from the UNHCR, too.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, webfact said:

In response, the Thai government maintained that the Uyghurs had voluntarily chosen to return to Xinjiang, asserting their safety under Chinese assurances. Thai officials also claimed there were no viable resettlement offers from other countries.

 

8 hours ago, webfact said:

A US State Department representative stated that the US had persistently proposed resettlement solutions for the Uyghurs, involving various countries, including possible resettlement within the United States.

Someone's telling porkies.. 

And after a recent visit to China buy the porcelain doll I wonder who it might be.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

@Adam Tomaszewskistop posting the quoted post in a translated language. English is the only language to be used.

 

Rule 16. English is the only permitted language anywhere on ASEAN NOW, except within the Thai language  forum, where using Thai is allowed. Short Thai translations of technical terms are permitted in specialty  forums. While we make allowances for members who do not speak English as their first language, we expect everyone to make an effort to post in a manner that allows others to understand their posts. As an international  forum we have members from many countries in the world, and English is not the first language of every poster.

Posted
10 hours ago, webfact said:

A US State Department representative stated that the US had persistently proposed resettlement solutions for the Uyghurs, involving various countries, including possible resettlement within the United States.

 

Parse the statement.

 

The US never offered resettlement anywhere.....just vague proposed possibilities.

 

You can be shirley, if there was a definite offer, it would have been mentioned.

  • Confused 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

Parse the statement.

 

The US never offered resettlement anywhere.....just vague proposed possibilities.

 

You can be shirley, if there was a definite offer, it would have been mentioned.

You need to research before you post, there were offers not only from the US!  "why"  is the question, were they not taken up.  answer,  because they were blocked by Thailand !!  the relevent agency were not allowed access to the Uyghurs

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

You need to research before you post, there were offers not only from the US!  "why"  is the question, were they not taken up.  answer,  because they were blocked by Thailand !!  the relevent agency were not allowed access to the Uyghurs

 

Details, please.

What offers?

Posted
2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

you dont have google ??

 

That's what I thought.

You have a talking point.

"Proposed" and "possible" is not definite.

Why wouldn't the State Department mention even one of those real offers?

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

That's what I thought.

You have a talking point.

"Proposed" and "possible" is not definite.

Why wouldn't the State Department mention even one of those real offers?

The US offered to resettle the 48 Uyghurs, an official from the US state department said.

“The United States has worked with Thailand for years to avoid this situation, including by consistently and repeatedly offering to resettle the Uyghurs in other countries, including, at one point, the United States,” the US official said, asking not to be named.

Canada also offered asylum to the detained Uyghurs, said four sources, including diplomats and people with direct knowledge. Two of these sources said another offer came from Australia.

These proposals, which the sources said were not taken forward by Thailand over fears of a falling-out with China, have not been previously reported.

UNHCR, in a statement released on February 27, said: “The agency repeatedly sought access to the group and assurances from Thai authorities that these individuals, who had expressed a fear of return, would not be deported. No such access was granted,

Vice Foreign Minister Russ Jalichandra said in a statement. It would have exposed Thailand to “retaliation from China that would impact the livelihoods of many Thais,” Thailand 24 provinces of china

Thailand would Not give access

simple google search

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

 

The Thai POV seems more plausible and less hypocritical than the US State Depts in today's toxic world politics.

Ohh come one... The Thai said it was unrealistic because of the repercussions it would face from China.. Can you not understand this in the story/?

12 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand's vice minister for foreign affairs, labelled the third-country offers as "unrealistic," expressing concerns about potential repercussions from China that might affect Thailand's economy.

 They said the offers were unrealistic simply because they worry China will retaliate at Thailand for allowing them to be sent to other countries. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

an official from the US state department said

 

34 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

the US official said, asking not to be named

 

35 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

said four sources, including diplomats and people with direct knowledge

 

35 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

the sources said

 

Ooooooooh!  Anonymous sources said it!

 

image.png.cc2659fde270312241653b8a7ac036cd.png

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Posted

No worries:

 

Just send them to NYC....

 

Case closed.

 

America has plenty of military jet transport aircraft.

 

We could transport all to America within a matter of just a few weeks.

 

I would back this plan!

 

image.png.44c543b1fd1a3cfd2df08fa49af978ff.png

 

Let us, the USA, welcome anyone that Thailand chooses to export to China.....

 

Case Closed....in a Good Way.....!!!!!

 

NYC needs more immigrants, of Higher Quality....

 

And, IMHO, the WEEGERS are a very nice bunch of people....

 

image.png.7d336ad6e8ac8523e399d3fdd24811f8.png

 

Nice, no matter how you spell them....

 

 

 

Posted

Wonder if Thailand will be voted off the UN Human Rights Council that they were just elected to and joined in Jan, 2025? If you are going to choose returning Chinese asylum seekers to China (and detain them for 11 years, without processing them!), why were they ever voted on in the first place. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

“We have worked with Thailand for years to avoid this situation, including by consistently and repeatedly offering to resettle the Uyghurs in other countries, including, at times, the United States,” the State Department said in response to questions from The Associated Press.

 

Earlier this week, Thailand’s Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs Russ Jalichandra said there had been no serious offers to take the men.

 
  • Haha 1
Posted

That is so hilarious.

The US delivered most of the weapons and bombs which have been used in a mass murder (I don't want to use the G word some members here tend to get blood pressure problems when reading it) which is taking place since almost one and a half year and has led to almost 50,000 people, most of them women and children being unalived ( what a stupid word), the destruction of entire blocks and land robbery which is still taking place every day.

 

And now with a straight face they seriously are criticizing Thailand for deporting a few people??

 

that's impudence on a whole new level

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...