Jump to content

Wall Street Rebounds Sharply as Trump Softens Tariff Stance


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Wall Street Rebounds Sharply as Trump Softens Tariff Stance

 

U.S. stocks experienced a dramatic rebound after President Donald Trump unexpectedly announced a reversal on steep tariff hikes, choosing instead to implement a 10% universal import tax. The announcement sparked a surge across financial markets, marking one of the biggest rallies in recent years.

 

The decision comes just a day after new tariffs had taken effect, targeting key U.S. trade partners including Vietnam, which had been hit with a sharp 46% levy. These measures, unveiled by Trump the previous week, were broader and more severe than expected, triggering a steep selloff in equities and a wave of recession fears both domestically and abroad.

 

In a significant shift, the White House stated that higher tariffs would be paused for countries open to negotiation. However, Trump maintained a hard line on China, stating that tariffs on Chinese goods would rise “effective immediately” to at least 125%.

 

 

The market responded with enthusiasm. The S&P 500 soared 9.5%, notching its largest single-day gain since the 2008 financial crisis. The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed more than 7.8%, while the Nasdaq surged over 12%. Companies heavily reliant on Asian manufacturing, such as Nike and Apple, saw notable gains of 11% and 15% respectively.

 

The market’s dramatic turnaround followed days of intense volatility. Prior to Trump’s pivot, fears of an economic downturn had spilled over into the bond market, with investors dumping U.S. government debt in anticipation of a prolonged trade war.

 

“Although President Donald Trump was able to resist the stock market sell-off, once the bond market began to weaken too, it was only a matter of time before he folded,” said Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist at Capital Economics.

 

Ashworth suggested that the president’s retreat reflects a return to his original campaign promise of a broad 10% tariff across the board, but warned that resolving tensions with China will be a lengthy process. “It is difficult to see either side backing down in the next few days,” he said. “But we suspect that talks will eventually happen, although a full rollback of all the additional tariffs applied since Inauguration Day appear unlikely.”

 

Despite the day’s bullish rally, major indexes remained below pre-tariff levels. The S&P 500 was still down about 3% from last week and over 8% year-to-date. Tariffs on Chinese goods continue to loom large over the economy, with China accounting for more than $400 billion in U.S. imports last year, including 60% of footwear and 36% of apparel, according to the American Apparel and Footwear Association.

 

Prior to the policy shift, the National Retail Federation had warned that shipping traffic through U.S. ports could fall 20% in May compared to the previous year.

 

Following his announcement, Trump expressed optimism about reaching a deal with China and floated the possibility of granting tariff exemptions to certain companies, an approach that contrasts with his previously hardline stance. “I saw last night where people were getting a little queasy,” Trump said, acknowledging market unease while reiterating his intent to maintain tariffs on sectors such as autos, steel, aluminium, and possibly pharmaceuticals and lumber.

 

Political pressure is believed to have played a role in Trump’s sudden change of course. Influential backers like Tesla’s Elon Musk, hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman, and Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy had urged the president to reconsider his tariff strategy.

 

The about-face even surprised major financial institutions. Just before Trump’s announcement, Goldman Sachs released a report warning of a potential recession due to escalating tariffs. Mere hours later, the bank revised its outlook, still predicting minimal economic growth for the year and putting the chances of recession at 45%, despite the softened policy.

 

Ackman, who had previously called for a 90-day tariff moratorium, praised the president’s decision. “Thank you on behalf of all Americans,” he wrote on social media.

 

Based on a report by BBC  2025-04-10

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bkk6060 said:

Certainly a lesson for those who try to time the market.  How many sold thinking it was continuing way down?  

Stay the course and you will be rewarded in the long run.

define "long run"

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Get with the program. That was the plan all along. Karoline Leavitt said so.

 

But per NY Times:

 

White House officials repeatedly tried to suggest that today’s change in policy was a premeditated strategy designed to secure favorable deals.

 

But Trump himself acknowledged that his decision was made in response to the market turmoil, particularly in the bond market. “You have to be flexible,” the president said. “Over the last few days, it looked pretty glum.”

 

Give us the entire article from this Democratic propaganda outlet please. And how about a transcript of what he said, as opposed to second hand quotes.

  • Confused 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bamnutsak said:

So the "Golden Age" of America is delayed by 90 days?

 

Millions of Americans will have to wait 90 days to report to the factories.

 

 

White House on Monday - "There will not be a pause".

 

White House on Wednesday - "There will be a pause."

 

 

It won't be easy! :biggrin:

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, JustinT said:

 

He panicked because the bond market was tanking.  No country will take him seriously now.  It's obvious the US could not tolerate those tariff rates long term.


Well that and the fact that multiple online rightwing influencers that MAGA supporters flock to are broadcasting the *financial harm  Trump’s tariffs are causing.

 

 

Also 


Billionaires don’t like losing their Billions

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/07/trump-tariffs-lawsuit

 

*Financial harm to themselves. The harm was always meant to be visited on other folk.

 

Not much talk of the price of eggs these days, let alone ‘making liberals cry’.

 

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...