Jump to content

Swedish Man Sparks Airport Bomb Alert with Unclaimed Luggage


Recommended Posts

Posted

"She indicated the false alarm could stem from accidental chemical contamination, possibly from environments where explosives were handled or displayed" Where would a tourist gain access to such a site?

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:

Nowhere, if that actually would have been the real truth, the country would now be looking for an active bomb maker. That is what makes this entire news article pathetic.

Exactly

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, webfact said:

Overall, the incident highlights the effectiveness of modern security measures and the importance of vigilance around suspicious items in airports.

 

The purpose of the whole article was in the last sentence :biggrin:

 

Sarcasm aside, I guess they do deserve the thumbs-up.

 

Posted

"A Swedish man inadvertently caused a security scare at Udon Thani airport by leaving a suitcase containing explosive ingredients"

 

Then further down in the article...." Upon inspection, the bag was found to contain only personal items and dried herbs like butterfly pea flowers and bael fruit"

 

This is a mystery, why was the Swedish guy uncooperative and where did the explosive ingredients disappear to????:dry:

  • Like 2
Posted
45 minutes ago, bogozy said:

Uncooperative.

Why?

 

Best guess would be that he didn't speak fluent Thai and these idiots were peed off that they couldn't find anything against him.

 

Remember this could happen to any of us.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
Just now, Ben Zioner said:

Best guess would be that he didn't speak fluent Thai and these idiots were peed off that they couldn't find anything against him.

 

Remember this could happen to any of us.

Yeah they clearly try to blame the foreigner as usual. Even he left his luggage, has nothing to do with any actions that followed nor the false positive result.

Posted
16 minutes ago, outsider said:

Sarcasm aside, I guess they do deserve the thumbs-up.

 

 

What for? for detecting explosives where there are dried flowers?

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Ben Zioner said:

 

What for? for detecting explosives where there are dried flowers?

Maybe they were sold flower detectors by the Chinese when buying the machines in a government corrupted bid for 50 million :D

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, bogozy said:

Uncooperative.

Why?

 

Maybe knowing that the cases were packed by somebody else, he could not be sure of the contents, and panicked when challenged by authorities!

Posted
56 minutes ago, ronster said:

??? I have never had anyone pack a case for me or know anyone that has had someone pack one for them . Why 🧐 

Why was he also uncooperative when contacted ?

If going from Udon to BKK, then that might suggest he lives up country. This may also suggest that he has a Thai wife or Gf, who may have packed his suitcase.

Posted
1 hour ago, ronster said:

??? I have never had anyone pack a case for me or know anyone that has had someone pack one for them . Why 🧐 

Why was he also uncooperative when contacted ?

Always make sure that the man helping pack your supply of herbs washes his hands after constructing

Improvised Exploding Devices.

  • Haha 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

"A Swedish man inadvertently caused a security scare at Udon Thani airport by leaving a suitcase containing explosive ingredients"

 

Then further down in the article...." Upon inspection, the bag was found to contain only personal items and dried herbs like butterfly pea flowers and bael fruit"

 

This is a mystery, why was the Swedish guy uncooperative and where did the explosive ingredients disappear to????:dry:

Maybe the bag had been used for delivering explosive ingredients to someone, leaving traces after delivery.

Using the same bag for the return trip?  Got caught by someone in the airport with a P.P.M. explosives inspection? (that is never used when you board the plane?) 🫢

(After all, Alfred Nobel is a Swedish Name.)🙂

Posted
4 minutes ago, simon43 said:

No it couldn't!  Most people don't abandon suitcases at airports and most people would have cooperated with the security authorities...

Has nothing to do with their false positive test result + actions after. Could have been anyone's bag of a person they could not even call in the first place, within time. He would have even been mid-air during the time that they did those tests too. It's about the procedure, not the person.

Posted

I love the signature AI spin at the end

 

Quote

Overall, the incident highlights the effectiveness of modern security measures and the importance of vigilance around suspicious items in airports.

 

Yeah, that's what it highlights

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, wensiensheng said:

Don’t be silly. There never were any explosive ingredients. That was just faulty equipment used by the bomb squad, or someone didn’t know how to use it properly.

 

As to uncooperative. Imagine being accosted by a bunch of excited Thai policemen who think they have apprehended a master bomb maker/terrorist. I bet they slammed into him full speed accusing him of goodness knows what and like anyone else who is sensible, he kept his mouth shut while he worked out what the heck was happening.

I would want a lawyer first too in that case.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, LeRoux said:

Maybe the bag had been used for delivering explosive ingredients to someone, leaving traces after delivery.

Using the same bag for the return trip?  Got caught by someone in the airport with a P.P.M. explosives inspection? (that is never used when you board the plane?) 🫢

(After all, Alfred Nobel is a Swedish Name.)🙂

Maybe he forgot his bag ( abandon seems over the top) and there never was any explosive ingredients in the first place. Just faulty scanning equipment.

 

i know which I think is more likely, your John Le Carre theory, or a cock up by the police.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, simon43 said:

No it couldn't!  Most people don't abandon suitcases at airports and most people would have cooperated with the security authorities...

Abandon? Or forgot?

 

Who says he was uncooperative? Oh right, the authorities. Uncooperative because he didn’t immediately confess to being a terrorist? Or because he kept his mouth shut and wanted a lawyer? 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...