Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been declined my retirement extension due to a strange issue. I rent from a private landlord. For the first time in many years being here the IO is requesting personal info about my landlord. First they asked for the landlord's title deed on the condo. I obtained that but they did not accept it because the deed was in the bank's name because the landlord has a mortgage. Now they want a copy of the landlord's mortgage contract with the bank to prove he is not a nominee. I already gave the TM 30 which the landlord obviously submitted. The landlord does not want to give out this personal financial info with the bank and I don't blame them. Has anyone else had this kind of issue where immigration is wanting all types of personal info from their landlord?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Which immigration office is this? We've had similar reports from Chonburi Immigration's Jomtien office recently, it would be interesting to know if it happens elsewhere.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, leytonorient said:

Has anyone else had this kind of issue where immigration is wanting all types of personal info from their landlord?

Yes - but for a marriage-based extension, which they hate doing.  This is the first I have heard regarding a retirement-based case. 

It would seem the agent-money coffers are coming up short, so they are pushing more legit applicants to their agent-buddies.  I would try to find an agent who will factor your actually meeting the financials in, and offer a cost short of the 15K (in Bangkok), which bypasses the financial requirements.

Posted
2 hours ago, renaissanc said:

If you are renting your accommodation, apologize to your landlord and say you'll have to move because of Immigration's requirements. This might make him change his mind. If he still won't help you and you can't talk to his wife (women are more sensible than men in financial matters generally), you will have to decide: shall I move accommodation or leave the country? The answer is obvious.

The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information.

Posted

When I renewed two years ago, the IO insisted on the deed to the condo, as the owner was not in the blue book.

(it was her daughter who was registered in the blue book and managing everything for her elderly mother).

We produced the deed and all was okay. But it was a small battle over my unwillingness to provide an envelope.

This was at CW.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 6/11/2025 at 5:52 PM, leytonorient said:

I have been declined my retirement extension due to a strange issue. I rent from a private landlord. For the first time in many years being here the IO is requesting personal info about my landlord. First they asked for the landlord's title deed on the condo. I obtained that but they did not accept it because the deed was in the bank's name because the landlord has a mortgage. Now they want a copy of the landlord's mortgage contract with the bank to prove he is not a nominee. I already gave the TM 30 which the landlord obviously submitted. The landlord does not want to give out this personal financial info with the bank and I don't blame them. Has anyone else had this kind of issue where immigration is wanting all types of personal info from their landlord?

Yes

Jomtien is asking for copy of landlords ID, copy of landlords land registry for rented property and copy of land registry for their own residence all for a student extension 

Posted
On 6/13/2025 at 10:32 AM, FritsSikkink said:

The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information.

Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity.

When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method.

Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity.

When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method.

Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid.

No, that isn't what I am saying, read it again.

Posted
4 hours ago, sandyf said:

Are you saying immigration shouldn't have the right to ensure extension applicants are not aiding and abetting criminal activity.

When I first came here there was a consensus that buying a house through a company with nominee shareholders was the only sensible method.

Those that respected the law and did it with their wife were seen as stupid.

 

That the landlord is an individual (not a company) could be established with the usual documents requested. The additional ones that the OP is being asked for are way over the top.

Posted
On 6/13/2025 at 4:36 PM, DrJack54 said:

Elaborate

 

Not much to say. IO suggested a way to "expedite the process". I declined. The number was absurd.

Posted
6 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

No, that isn't what I am saying, read it again.

Quite obvious what you said, and what you meant.

Your words

"The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information."

Posted
12 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Quite obvious what you said, and what you meant.

Your words

"The landlord is right, immigration shouldn't ask for this information."

That doesn't make me support illegal ownership. 

The conditions of somebody's mortgage is none of their business.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Caldera said:

 

That the landlord is an individual (not a company) could be established with the usual documents requested. The additional ones that the OP is being asked for are way over the top.

You are entitled to your opinion.

Immigration is quite entitled to check the landlord  is a private individual, and not a company.

At the end of the day,  the man with the stamp has the last word.

Posted
11 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

That doesn't make me support illegal ownership. 

The conditions of somebody's mortgage is none of their business.

 

And what do you think advocating against immigration's right to verify supports.

Posted
6 minutes ago, sandyf said:

And what do you think advocating against immigration's right to verify supports.

They need to know where you live, how the owner support his finances has nothing to do with that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...