Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Air India is one thing  and I would never fly them but my concern is about Boeing. After the 737 Max my faith in in this company is faltering.   Boeing had an issue with 787 manufacturing.  The speciic issue was about how fasteners were installed.  One former Boeing employee was fired after going public about this issue.  I hope the aircraft was not the problem but I said the same thing after the Max crashes.  On this flight there were 242 on board and all are probably deceased.  This airplane crashed into a residential area near the airport and the death toll will probably be higher.  Really sad and RIP. 

 

 

  • Agree 2
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

I never thought about it, but I guess I've flown on a slightly different version of the plane, the 787-9, between San Francisco and Tokyo.  

 

Very sad.  All those people.  

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted

Crashed into a residential area. That will be terrific loss.

Passengers on board:

“Of these, 169 are Indian nationals, 53 are British nationals, 1 Canadian national and 7 Portuguese nationals,” Air India said."

  • Heart-broken 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

What heppened to the engine noise at the end?  Also, were these Rolls Royce or GE engines?   

GE engines - GEnx-1B64

  • Thanks 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Stocky said:

GE engines - GEnx-1B64

 American companies for both the aircraft and engines.  I read in the past some Rolls Royce engines for the 787 had some problems but not about GE engines. 

Posted
1 minute ago, sqwakvfr said:

From the vidoe the flaps look like they were zero or possibly 5 degrees? 

 

It's hard to tell from the video.  The gear is still down.   Isn't the gear raised after take off? 

Posted

That's  it, not flying another "Dreamliner" or any other Boeing aircraft if I can avoid it. Too many whistleblowers have painted a damning picture of the lack of safety focus in the company.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, norfolkandchance said:

'Positive rate of climb' then the gear is raised.

Don't they also retract the gear in case of engine failure to increase glide distance ..... or is that pointless when so low?

Posted
4 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said:

Maintenance failure? Sabotage? Terror act?

Better not think of technical failure.

Birds,  debris at the runaway, I guess we will know before than later

  • Agree 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

 

It's hard to tell from the video.  The gear is still down.   Isn't the gear raised after take off? 

About 2000 feet for landing gear retraction for 787. From what I'm seeing it only got up to 600ft.

Posted

Boeing was destroyed by their managers and is now a nofly. The dreamliner had a series of electrical fires.

Use Finnair busines (Airbus) from and to TH quite safer than Boeing.

2018-2019 2x737 Max plane.  346 killed.
Dec 2024. 737-800. 181 killed.
Nov 2024. 737 cargo caught fire.
Nov 2024. 737-400 F destroyed by fire.
May 2024: Crash in Dakar.
May 2024: Boeing Fedex crash in Istanbul.
March 2024: 737 fire in engine. Texas.
March 2024. 787. Nodesdiving, nearly crash.
Jan 2025. 737 Max door blow out.
Now 1x787-8. About 242 killed.

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Are the flaps deployed? 

That was my immediate first thought. That aircraft has stalled and an incorrect flap setting can cause that to happen.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   1 member



×
×
  • Create New...