New footage shows Brit strolling out of air crash.

[MalcolmB]

Amazing.

 

 

 

[BangkokHank]

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British. If I were to get Indian citizenship, do you think the media would refer to me as an Indian man?

[bkk6060]

No doubt they are the toughest and smartest people in the world.

[MalcolmB]

4 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British. If I were to get Indian citizenship, do you think the media would refer to me as an Indian man?

Whatever, but how cool was he strolling out, checking his phone.

He was reported in all the UK news as British.

[connda]

Hope this guy isn't a fan of the Final Destination movies?  🤔

[marin]

Deja vu or what? Same topic same responses from just a week ago. Even the same language meant to create problems. 

 

 

 

[Hamus Yaigh]

35 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British.

Why is this important to you in this context?

In the case of the sole survivor of the Air India crash, he is described as a British national of Indian origin, suggesting he has British citizenship and likely renounced Indian citizenship, since once becoming a British citizen he can not hold dual citizenship with India.

[LennyW]

58 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British. If I were to get Indian citizenship, do you think the media would refer to me as an Indian man?

Indians have settled in the UK for many generations now, not uncommon to have British Indians.

[Hummin]

1 hour ago, BangkokHank said:

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British. If I were to get Indian citizenship, do you think the media would refer to me as an Indian man?

Same goes for Americans, who are the Americans? The real Americans. Think before you write anything stupid

[Rimmer]

Multiple troll posts and replies have been removed

[MalcolmB]

1 hour ago, marin said:

Deja vu or what? Same topic same responses from just a week ago. Even the same language meant to create problems. 

 

 

 

New footage.

Amazing eh?

[marin]

36 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

New footage.

Amazing eh?

I posted the same clip you have the day you posted your original Brit survives crap.  Seriously get  life mate. 

[JensenZ]

2 hours ago, BangkokHank said:

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British. If I were to get Indian citizenship, do you think the media would refer to me as an Indian man?

Yes, it does. What other countries call people who obtained citizenship is irrelevant.

 

 

[sqwakvfr]

I am little surprised by the number:

 

Boeing 787 identical to crash jet made four emergency landings in a month

[Ralf001]

4 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

I am little surprised by the number:

 

 

Meh, airplanes have issues... no surprises there.

[richard_smith237]

3 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

He was reported in all the UK news as British.

… yet the very video you posted referred to the ‘Air India survivor’….  & you still chose to go with Brit Survivor… 

 

That you referred to the surviving passenger solely as a ‘Brit’ is no

naive or innocent mistake of quoting British media… 

 

[richard_smith237]

12 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

I am little surprised by the number:

 

Boeing 787 identical to crash jet made four emergency landings in a month

 

To give a balanced frame of reference - how does that compare to other commonly flown aircraft types ? 
 

 

[sqwakvfr]

2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

To give a balanced frame of reference - how does that compare to other commonly flown aircraft types ? 
 

 

Don't know but right now the B787-8 is very well known and just read about  same type landing in Scotland while squawking 7700 (in flight emegency) and an Air India of the same type turning back to Hong Kong after 90 mninutes of flight due to technical reasons (not sure if this was a declared emergency or not).  

[MalcolmB]

1 hour ago, marin said:

Seriously get  life mate. 

Who me or the survivor? 

[MalcolmB]

13 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

yet the very video you posted referred to the ‘Air India survivor’….  & you still chose to go with Brit Survivor… 

It always amazes me how dumb you are.

Air India refers to the plane line. 
Not that the gentleman was Indian. 
 

I don’t even understand why it is such an issue to all you bigots anyway.

The point is the absolute miracle survival and the mostly unscathed survival.

 

All you idiots want to talk about is he isn’t a “real” Brit.

Who has a British passport is married with kids in England and lives and works in Britain. 
 

[MalcolmB]

18 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

That you referred to the surviving passenger solely as a ‘Brit’ is no

naive or innocent mistake of quoting British media…

What is the “mistake” you are referring to?

[jayboy]

Makes you proud to be British.Here is another example of British grit.

 

 

[proton]

4 hours ago, LennyW said:

Indians have settled in the UK for many generations now, not uncommon to have British Indians.

 

Hardly many generations, London was 98% white in the 1961 census. The bloke was from Leicester, white minority city, but only recently thanks to his lot.

[richard_smith237]

2 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

It always amazes me how dumb you are.

Air India refers to the plane line. 
Not that the gentleman was Indian. 

 

Yet it doesn't amaze me - not even slightly - how consistently dumb your takes are. The sheer desperation with which you leap to idiotic conclusions in defence of your own trolling is laughable.

 

‘Air India Survivor’ refers to someone who survived an Air India crash - that has nothing to do with his passport. Just as the two crew members from the Jeju Air crash on 29 Dec are referred to as 'Jeju Air survivors' - because that’s the relevant context, not their birth certificates.

 

...But, nuance and common sense clearly aren’t part of your toolkit. You’d rather twist things into some warped bait-and-switch so you can cry foul and call everyone else a bigot. It’s tired, transparent, and pathetic.

 

2 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

I don’t even understand why it is such an issue to all you bigots anyway.

 

Your transparent trolling is the issue - You deliberately prod and provoke just so you can play innocent then fling around accusations of bigotry. Referring to the Air India survivor as simply 'the Brit' isn’t some innocent shorthand - it’s a calculated move. You know full well it’ll stir a reaction, because he’s British-Indian, and you’re counting on that nuance being pointed out.

Not that it should matter - but that’s the whole point of your juvenile game: bait, wait, respond....

 

2 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

The point is the absolute miracle survival and the mostly unscathed survival.

 

Agreed - his nationality is entirely irrelevant. Yet you deliberately used it to troll here, just as you did in an earlier thread. It’s a pattern with you: toss in a loaded label, wait for the reaction, then pretend to be shocked when people call it out. It’s not debate - it’s bait.

 

2 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

All you idiots want to talk about is he isn’t a “real” Brit.

Who has a British passport is married with kids in England and lives and works in Britain. 

 

Agreed - he’s British and Indian, accurately described as a 'British-Indian dual national'... not that it’s remotely relevant to the fact he survived a horrific tragedy as the sole survivor.

 

But of course, it became relevant the moment you twisted it into bait - a calculated provocation. And like clockwork, when someone bites, you get exactly what you’re fishing for: a chance to pounce, playing the smug victim while lobbing insults, calling people idiots and bigots. It’s classic weasel-tier behaviour - bottom-feeding and cockroachey, but sadly predictable

[Briggsy]

Touchy touchy Indians

[MalcolmB]

1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Yet it doesn't amaze me - not even slightly - how consistently dumb your takes are. The sheer desperation with which you leap to idiotic conclusions in defence of your own trolling is laughable.

 

‘Air India Survivor’ refers to someone who survived an Air India crash - that has nothing to do with his passport. Just as the two crew members from the Jeju Air crash on 29 Dec are referred to as 'Jeju Air survivors' - because that’s the relevant context, not their birth certificates.

 

...But, nuance and common sense clearly aren’t part of your toolkit. You’d rather twist things into some warped bait-and-switch so you can cry foul and call everyone else a bigot. It’s tired, transparent, and pathetic.

 

 

Your transparent trolling is the issue - You deliberately prod and provoke just so you can play innocent then fling around accusations of bigotry. Referring to the Air India survivor as simply 'the Brit' isn’t some innocent shorthand - it’s a calculated move. You know full well it’ll stir a reaction, because he’s British-Indian, and you’re counting on that nuance being pointed out.

Not that it should matter - but that’s the whole point of your juvenile game: bait, wait, respond....

 

 

Agreed - his nationality is entirely irrelevant. Yet you deliberately used it to troll here, just as you did in an earlier thread. It’s a pattern with you: toss in a loaded label, wait for the reaction, then pretend to be shocked when people call it out. It’s not debate - it’s bait.

 

 

Agreed - he’s British and Indian, accurately described as a 'British-Indian dual national'... not that it’s remotely relevant to the fact he survived a horrific tragedy as the sole survivor.

 

But of course, it became relevant the moment you twisted it into bait - a calculated provocation. And like clockwork, when someone bites, you get exactly what you’re fishing for: a chance to pounce, playing the smug victim while lobbing insults, calling people idiots and bigots. It’s classic weasel-tier behaviour - bottom-feeding and cockroachey, but sadly predictable

So dumb.

The whole world has reported him a Brit.

So I did also, I know how you love changing the facts around to suit your narrative all the time to give us your imagined versions of events.

What a plonker.

 

 

[MalcolmB]

1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

Yet you deliberately used it to troll here, just as you did in an earlier thread.

Are you ashamed that he British?
He doesnt fit you narrative of what a Brit looks like?
What is exactly your issue with the man? He isn’t white enough for you?

[Quentin Zen]

10 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

The whole world has reported him a Brit.

My online newspaper did not, and I am part of the world.   Fact check!!!!! 

[MalcolmB]

4 minutes ago, Quentin Zen said:

My online newspaper did not, and I am part of the world.   Fact check!!!!! 

Screenshot?

Point is Richard seems to think I made this up.

I read mostly the British press, and they all wrote that he was British.

Richard might be embarrassed about him, but I am proud of my fellow Brit survivor, but to be honest cringe about the ugly Brits like Richard.

[ronnie50]

7 hours ago, BangkokHank said:

Acquiring British citizenship does not make an Indian British. If I were to get Indian citizenship, do you think the media would refer to me as an Indian man?

Actually yes it does, according to the Immigration Act. As for you getting Indian citizenship, apparently you'd need to give up your current citizenship. Seems India is ok with their citizens getting another passport, but anyone wanting to become Indian has to give up their current passport. Not fair. But I don't care as I would never want it...