Jump to content

Dr Aseem Malhotra - White House insiders say the MRNA shot will be pulled from the market


Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Which one is the "MRNA shot"?

It refers to all Covid 'vaccines' using the mRNA platform.  

So that's all the mRNA jabs (like Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) that deliver genetic instructions (mRNA) into your cells, which then produce the spike protein internally.

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

It refers to all Covid 'vaccines' using the mRNA platform.  

So that's all the mRNA jabs (like Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) that deliver genetic instructions (mRNA) into your cells, which then produce the spike protein internally.

The guys here will never admit they were lied to or that they were wrong.

Point blank refuse

  • Like 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

Alternatives ? 

The Sinovac Vaccine was produced the old-fashioned way!  

 

Of course, it is about as effective as a saline shot....

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

Which one is the "MRNA shot"?

Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna were MRNA

 

Johnson & Johnson & Novavax were not MRNA but instead were a viral vector vaccine, which means it used a harmless virus (adenovirus) to deliver the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein into the body to stimulate an immune response. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Callmeishmael said:

The Sinovac Vaccine was produced the old-fashioned way!  

Of course, it is about as effective as a saline shot....

... but not as safe as a pure saline shot, as the Sinovac vaccine also contains alum (aluminum hydroxide) as an adjuvant.  

And safest is of course > NO injections

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Callmeishmael said:

The Sinovac Vaccine was produced the old-fashioned way!  

 

Of course, it is about as effective as a saline shot....

At least people wernt harmed or killed by sinovac

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, Callmeishmael said:

The Sinovac Vaccine was produced the old-fashioned way!  

 

Of course, it is about as effective as a saline shot....

 

I'm struggling to grasp the whole thing. People still think that vaccines are good for the body? After all the research and info?

 

If the Sinovac is as effective as an inert jab, surely that is a good thing. Produced in the old-fashioned way? Well vaxxes down the decades have caused billions of bad outcomes, and not one has ever saved anybody from anything. Simply caused misery.

 

There has never been a 'safe' and 'effective' vaccine. They are all totally unnecessary. And I'll say why. Two things are essential to grasp if one is to see the foolishness of taking a jab.

 

Firstly: The pathogenic virus, that is out to get us, has never been found in nature. Only in a computer. Not even in a lab petri dish.

 

Secondly: For a vaccine to work, the immune system has to learn. There is no evidence that there is such a thing as an immune system; let alone that it can learn.

 

Regarding the second. We have an inbuilt protection that is part of general body maintenance. The body adapts to the conditions that it finds itself in. It is protecting us at all times;24/7/365.

 

As has been correctly stated earlier on the thread; nutritious food, clean water, fresh air and a positive outlook, will keep the body in good order. It will then be equipped to ensure good health and deal with the toxicity that will inevitably come its way.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, mstevens said:

 

Exercise frequently, eat well, get enough sleep, maintain positive fulfilling relationships and live your best life.

OMG, that's some serious science right there. 🤦🤦 What about praying? 🙄😵‍💫

So, it'd be interesting to see how many kids who have measles do everything that you claim prevents infections by dangerous diseases.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Galong said:

So, it'd be interesting to see how many kids who have measles do everything that you claim prevents infections by dangerous diseases.

By 'disease' do you mean something that has been 'caught' or caused by a pathogenic virus?

 

IMO, the symptoms of measles are the body ridding itself of undesirables. The symptoms, the disease, are the cure.

 

 

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

And thus perfectly safe to have it injected into your body... 😅

 

Good point. Does it not accumulate in the body? Build up to the point where the body is desperate to get rid of it?

 

It used to be mercury, but that has been phased out, and replaced by aluminum.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Have you found the 8 page's report?

 

You are probably referring to the 8-page Open Letter that dr Malhotra posted on his website https://doctoraseem.com/

in which he makes the case that there is overwhelming evidence that calls for the suspension of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (which, by technicality, is a genetic therapy) because of serious harms.

And here the direct link to that Open Letter

https://doctoraseem.com/thousands-of-doctors-sign-petition-to-suspend-covid-mrna-vaccines-an-open-letter-to-the-gmc/

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

By 'disease' do you mean something that has been 'caught' or caused by a pathogenic virus?

 

IMO, the symptoms of measles are the body ridding itself of undesirables. The symptoms, the disease, are the cure.

 

 

The symptoms are the result of  both the pathogen disrupting cellular activity and the immune system ( yes we have such a thing ) attempting to destroy the pathogen.

It seems lost in general opinion that there is a difference in creating antivirals and antibiotics.

A Vaccines by definition is a word that applies to both but antivirals are notoriously much more difficult to develop

than antibacterials .

Natural immunity is decidedly enhanced by maintaining bodily fitness but certainly does not guarantee infection by a pathogen. 

There is the example of acquired immunity demonstrated by milk maids who suffered the annoyance of cowpox and when smallpox was circulating a population they never succumbed to that often deadly disease.

That was at a time when the existence of such distinct pathogens was unknown. But the association of one illness providing protection from the other was certainly recognized.

I am however very suss on the mRna question. 

Our immune system has a procedural methodology. The mRna idea bypasses pretty much all of it and I believe that is why it creates  more issues than it solves.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

The symptoms are the result of  both the pathogen disrupting cellular activity and the immune system ( yes we have such a thing ) attempting to destroy the pathogen.

It seems lost in general opinion that there is a difference in creating antivirals and antibiotics.

A Vaccines by definition is a word that applies to both but antivirals are notoriously much more difficult to develop

than antibacterials .

Natural immunity is decidedly enhanced by maintaining bodily fitness but certainly does not guarantee infection by a pathogen. 

There is the example of acquired immunity demonstrated by milk maids who suffered the annoyance of cowpox and when smallpox was circulating a population they never succumbed to that often deadly disease.

That was at a time when the existence of such distinct pathogens was unknown. But the association of one illness providing protection from the other was certainly recognized.

I am however very suss on the mRna question. 

Our immune system has a procedural methodology. The mRna idea bypasses pretty much all of it and I believe that is why it creates  more issues than it solves.

The only bit of that post that I largely with is the last line. And then only partly.

 

"The mRNA idea bypasses pretty much all of it and I believe that is why it creates  more issues than it solves."

 

The mRNA jab is seen as a toxic insult by the body's defence.

 

It does not solve anything what so ever. There is nothing to solve. It creates mayhem, and depending upon the state of the defence/maintenance/immune system, and the toxicity of the jab, it can result in nothing of note; or death. And Everything in between.

 

Have to address the following.

 

"There is the example of acquired immunity demonstrated by milk maids who suffered the annoyance of cowpox and when smallpox was circulating a population they never succumbed to that often deadly disease."

 

There was no pathogenic anything circulating. Filthy conditions and poor diet. The 'milk maids' had a more robust defence than most, due to them drinking the fresh cow's milk.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

I guess for a cold

'Coughs and sneezes spread diseases.'

 

Do they? Of course. Even little kids know that.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...