Jump to content

Trump’s 50-Day Pause: Russia’s Green Light for Ukraine Push


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

Picture courtesy of AP via CNN

 

MOSCOW - In a surprising political manoeuvre, President Trump has granted Vladimir Putin a 50-day window to continue Russia’s offensive in Ukraine without immediate repercussions. The move delays sanctions, including threatened 100 percent tariffs on Russia, until early September, leaving Ukrainians to endure relentless missile and drone attacks.

 

Although the Kremlin publicly deems the threatened sanctions and arms pledges to Ukraine “serious,” insiders in Moscow reportedly feel relief at the postponement. The delayed action gives Russia time to either advance its military objectives or wait for potential shifts in US policy.

 

The Kremlin is undeterred by the prospective sanctions. With extensive experience in navigating international restrictions, Russia remains resilient. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov expressed confidence in managing further sanctions, stating Russia is accustomed to such economic pressures.

 

The pause in implementing sanctions provides Russia with an opportunity to bolster its military efforts in Ukraine. Some Russian officials believe the 50 days will provide ample time to make significant headway or wait for President Trump to reconsider his stance.

 

While Russia capitalises on this delay, it’s concerned about the potential influx of US weapons into Ukraine. The agreement to supply Patriot missile defence systems poses a tangible threat to Russian military strategies, particularly its aerial assaults.

 

Russia’s political figures are vocally criticising President Trump, accusing him of prolonging the conflict. On Kremlin-controlled state TV, Trump’s decision is compared to previous US administrations, suggesting scepticism about his strategies and intentions.

 

As the situation unfolds, the international community watches closely, understanding that much can change on the battlefield and in diplomatic arenas within this critical 50-day timeframe.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from CNN 2025-07-17

 

image.gif

 

image.png

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The 50 day pause gives Putin time to complete his ‘summer offensive’ AKA targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure.

The drone and missile attacks on Kiev and other major cities are just part of the war. The crucial part is on the battlefield and this announcement from Trump will have little to no impact on this. Ukraine needs more boots on the ground but refuses to open recruitment or conscription for the 18-25 year group.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

The drone and missile attacks on Kiev and other major cities are just part of the war. The crucial part is on the battlefield and this announcement from Trump will have little to no impact on this. Ukraine needs more boots on the ground but refuses to open recruitment or conscription for the 18-25 year group.

 

Can't they just hire an army from around the world like the Russians did from North Koera ?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

What Nth Korea has given by way of troops is a drop in the ocean and a good deal of these are manning the Nth Korean artillery units or are in non-active border crossing areas.

... or have been promoted to fertiliser! 😆 Sorry, I should not laugh, they are human beings too... but WTF are they doing on the Russia-Ukraine front???

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

The prolonging of the conflict happened in 2022 when Ukraine had Russia on the backfoot and could have pushed them back to the borders. Biden and the EU decided that drip feeding weapons systems was the best strategy. Certainly was the best strategy to prolong the war in their mission to severely weaken or collapse Russia rather than winning the war.

There could be some truth in this too!

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Good.  The sooner Russia makes it to the Dnieper and beyond to Odessa, the sooner Ukraine will have its back against the wall and finally agrees to surrender minus about 5 or 6 more Oblasts.  When Pokrovsk folds, the move toward the Dnieper should accelerate. 

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
Just now, newnative said:

    My god, look at the way he has ruined the Oval Office.  Talk about tacky.  He's running out of places to slap on all that gaudy whorehouse gold crap.  Where's the White House Historical Association?  Probably all fired.  

 

 

Your scars run deep, don't they?

 

You are going to need to get over it...............or it will be a very long 3 years.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
4 hours ago, connda said:

The entire thing could have been resolved in the April 2022 peace talks in Turkey - but the US and NATO wanted Ukraine to fight to the last Ukrainian, so that's what they now have gotten.  The goal was the strategic defeat of Russia and regime change in Russia.  What did they get.  UK and EU economically screwed as well as voters who want to push their own government's out of office.  In the meanwhile Russia has 5 Ukrainian Obelisks absorbed into the Russian Federation with two to five more lining up before this ends.  If Ukraine got rid of Zelensky and elected a new president and accepted the facts on the ground, this could be over in a month.  Instead?  Well, the US and NATO still want the strategic overthrow of Russia, so it won't end. Russia will keep the attrition wars moving forward, Ukraine will keep retreating and losing territory.  C'est la vie.  

 

What a load of rubbish.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 hours ago, dinsdale said:

The prolonging of the conflict happened in 2022 when Ukraine had Russia on the backfoot and could have pushed them back to the borders. Biden and the EU decided that drip feeding weapons systems was the best strategy. Certainly was the best strategy to prolong the war in their mission to severely weaken or collapse Russia rather than winning the war.

 

 

Someone certainly benefitting from prolonging the war.

Posted
16 hours ago, dinsdale said:

The prolonging of the conflict happened in 2022 when Ukraine had Russia on the backfoot and could have pushed them back to the borders. Biden and the EU decided that drip feeding weapons systems was the best strategy. Certainly was the best strategy to prolong the war in their mission to severely weaken or collapse Russia rather than winning the war.

 

I have to agree with this one. NATO could have ended this war by giving a lot more help and weapons to Ukraine at an early stage.

 

But have in mind, that Russia has threatened with use of nuclear weapons numerous times, and Europe and the US were threading on uncertain ground here. They were not aligned and working together either, like they are now. In the beginning, countries supported Ukraine with only light weapons, body armour, and stuff like that. 

Time and continued Russian threats and violence have forced Europe to react further, and that has taken time. It has taken time for politicians to act. And now the nuclear threats are no longer seen as real, or something to worry about anymore, just desperate words from a desperate inner circle of war criminals at Kremlin.

 

Btw, you mention the EU. NATO is more correct to use here. They are the ones supplying with weapons, having the strategic military view on this war. NATO has also a few countries which are not members of the EU. Like Australia, Canada, Iceland, Switzerland and Norway.

 

The European Union's primary task has been the economical supporting of Ukraine in this war, sanctions, and being independent of Russia in the long run, and to bring their countries closer together against the Russian threats.

Posted
36 minutes ago, thaibreaker said:

NATO has also a few countries which are not members of the EU. Like Australia, Canada, Iceland, Switzerland and Norway.

 

 

I have to correct myself here. Switzerland is not a member of NATO, and Australia is a NATO partner, together with Japan, New Zealand and South Korea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...