28 minutes ago, riclag said:

Drip Drip- DNI Tulsi.  She's so articulate when she speaks  during her interviews.

More Dem Deception.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/brennan-directed-publication-implausible-reports-claiming-putin-preferred-trump-2016-house-found

Hilarious!

 

This is from the 2020 GOP-led Senate Committee report! 🤣

 

“The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president,”

 

“Moscow’s intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.”

 

Report of the Select Committee on Intelligence United States Senate on Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/2020/08/18/publications-report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures/

34 minutes ago, candide said:

Hilarious!

 

This is from the 2020 GOP-led Senate Committee report! 🤣

 

“The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president,”

 

“Moscow’s intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.”

This has been debunked.  

 

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.

 

 

Here is a snippet from the 2017 hearings. 

 

MR. SCHIFF: lt provides in the report on 2016, April 22nd, data staged for exfiltration by the Fancy Bear actor'

MR.HENRY:Yes,sir .So that again staged for which,l mean there is not -- the analogy I used with Mr. Stewart earlier was we don't have video of it happening, but there are indicators that it happened. There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don't have the evidence that says it actually left..

 

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2020/05/sh21.pdf

55 minutes ago, riclag said:

Drip Drip- DNI Tulsi.  She's so articulate when she speaks  during her interviews.

More Dem Deception.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/brennan-directed-publication-implausible-reports-claiming-putin-preferred-trump-2016-house-found

"The report has never before been released to the public, and instead, has remained highly classified within the intelligence community.

The report, which was based on an investigation launched by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., was dated Sept. 18, 2020. At the time of the publication of the report, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., was the chairman of the committee".

Fox source

 DNI Director of National Intel head of 17 intel agencies ,Tulsi Got the receipts !

Know wonder why Comey went after(set him up) Mike Flynn in Jan 2017 , he would of taken on a similar role as Tulsi.

Despite the lack of evidence, why did everyone on the news say that Russia hacked the election? 

 

Watch this video that shows the MSN claiming that Russia hacked the election.   It starts at the 7:50 mark.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, TedG said:

Despite the lack of evidence, why did everyone on the news say that Russia hacked the election? 

 

Watch this video that shows the MSN claiming that Russia hacked the election.   It starts at the 7:50 mark.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Elaborate conspiracy to get Trump! 

A formidable enemy the left wing News & Trump haters have become!

Thanks in part to a Politicized weaponized 6 ways to Sunday intel,coordinating with 

establishment Washington,DC .

 

Its nice when the head intel agent has evidence thats been buried away!

 

 

 

4 minutes ago, kwonitoy said:

 

Yeah, Russia hacking the email server is a total lie.  

On 7/19/2025 at 3:05 AM, Wingate said:

The intel community's assessment of Russia's effect on 2016 (which includes Putin's funding of Independent Jill Stein's campaign, as Putin had learned from Perot '92 and Nader '00) was that it did not affect the Electoral College outcome. Stein did receive votes that exceeded Trump's margin in Wisconsin and Michigan, but not enough to exceed his Pennsylvania margin over Hillary. He could have lost MI and WI and still won.

This is false.   Putin did not fund Jill Stein's campaign. 

 

 

On 7/19/2025 at 3:05 AM, Wingate said:

Campaign Chief Manafort did travel to Spain and met with GRU asset Kontantin Kilimnik and gave him internal polling data from the Trump team. Kilimnik gave that to the trolls in the GRU's Internet Research Agency in St Petersburg, who then microtargeted voters in key swing States with made up stories about things like Uranium One and Hillary's health.

Is polling data a classified secret? 

On 7/19/2025 at 3:05 AM, Wingate said:

-Campaign aid Roger Stone was in constant contact with Julian Assange, who had been the recipient of hacked emails from John Podesta's computer. Stone was kept abreast of release dates and informed Trump. Trump even noted in one of his rallies that "In a few days, there's some very interesting information coming out",.

However, both Stone and WikiLeaks later denied direct contact. WikiLeaks stated they hadn't been in contact with Stone and described his claims as attempts at bragging. Stone himself later denied meeting with Assange, stating that he never left the US in 2016 and the claims were "provably false". He asserted his statements were based on public information from the WikiLeaks Twitter feed and "political hyperbole". 

 

Evidence presented in the Mueller investigation and Stone's subsequent trial revealed efforts by Stone and his associates to establish communication with Assange or WikiLeaks through intermediaries. Some of these efforts included attempts to pass messages through intermediaries like Randy Credico, who was identified by Stone as a "backchannel" to Assange, a claim Credico denied in court. 

 

It does not like your version of events is correct. 

On 7/19/2025 at 3:05 AM, Wingate said:

There WAS willful cooperation between the Trump campaign and Russia. There is absolutely no doubt about that. Oddly, or perhaps not, during the Durham investigation, neither Durham nor his team had any interest in seeing the intel---HUIMINT, SIGINT and liaison---regarding Manafort or Stone. They were not looking for truth, but just hoping to find undotted "i"s and uncrossed "t"s.

 

Be more specific. 

On 7/19/2025 at 3:05 AM, Wingate said:

What Trump et al are trying to do now is obfuscate and be less than complete in what they release....just as I am sure he will do now re Epstein. It will work with the cult, as can be seen right here in this thread.

 

MAGAs can continue to believe what they want, since it is a cult anyway, where truth and facts do not matter.

 

Knock yourselves silly.

 

Your post was mainly BS. 

14 hours ago, TedG said:

This has been debunked.  

 

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.

 

 

Here is a snippet from the 2017 hearings. 

 

MR. SCHIFF: lt provides in the report on 2016, April 22nd, data staged for exfiltration by the Fancy Bear actor'

MR.HENRY:Yes,sir .So that again staged for which,l mean there is not -- the analogy I used with Mr. Stewart earlier was we don't have video of it happening, but there are indicators that it happened. There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don't have the evidence that says it actually left..

 

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2020/05/sh21.pdf

Nice try! 😆

 

Not debunked. He said they had “indicators” and “circumstantial evidence” of data being exfiltrated from the DNC servers. He confirmed his assessment.

 

But don't forget Crowdstrike was a "Ukrainian company"! 🤣

 

And it's not the only case of Russian interference.. There was also, for example, the hacking of Podesta's email. Russian hackers have been identified. This just another example, there were plenty of others.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinmurnane/2016/10/21/how-john-podestas-emails-were-hacked-and-how-to-prevent-it-from-happening-to-you/

9 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

You’re lost.  Just like every other leftist.

Empty trolling blah blah again!

14 hours ago, TedG said:

Despite the lack of evidence, why did everyone on the news say that Russia hacked the election? 

 

Watch this video that shows the MSN claiming that Russia hacked the election.   It starts at the 7:50 mark.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lame MAGA distortion and confusion tactic.

 

The Russian interference was not about hacking voting machines! 🤣

11 hours ago, TedG said:

Is polling data a classified secret? 

Why did Russia buy it? 🤣

14 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

You’re lost.  Just like every other leftist.

Here's another leftist Joy Behar,  who can't accept reality!

Trump is always right! DNI exposes it all.

The Obama establishment really put a hex on they/them.

https://nypost.com/2025/07/23/media/white-house-says-the-view-could-be-cancelled-next-following-joy-behars-anti-trump-tirade/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost

Brennan  was  pissed off at American voters , he was a Commie sympathizer!

 

It's a hoax, but it's a ridiculous MAGA hoax. It was not claimed that Russia hacked the voting infrastructure.  It's just the usual MAGA confusion tactics for the gullible! 

 

"Gabbard’s claim relies heavily on an alleged contradiction between a Jan. 6, 2017, intelligence assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an “influence campaign” in an attempt to help elect Donald Trump and earlier intelligence assessments that concluded Russia did not successfully use cyberattacks on election infrastructure in the 2016 election. But those two assessments are not in contradiction."

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2025/07/gabbards-misleading-coup-claim/

 The Obama administration's  makes the Stasi & Gestapo  look like schoolyard !

Years & Years of deception ,intimidation ,arrests.espionage.  

 

Hearing on the Weaponization of the Federal Government !

https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/115442/text

 

9 hours ago, candide said:

Nice try! 😆

 

Not debunked. He said they had “indicators” and “circumstantial evidence” of data being exfiltrated from the DNC servers. He confirmed his assessment.

 

But don't forget Crowdstrike was a "Ukrainian company"! 🤣

 

And it's not the only case of Russian interference.. There was also, for example, the hacking of Podesta's email. Russian hackers have been identified. This just another example, there were plenty of others.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinmurnane/2016/10/21/how-john-podestas-emails-were-hacked-and-how-to-prevent-it-from-happening-to-you/

It was debunked.  There is no real evidece.    You posted a link from 2016 which is before the 2017 hearings. 

8 hours ago, candide said:

Lame MAGA distortion and confusion tactic.

 

The Russian interference was not about hacking voting machines! 🤣

Why did the press push a false narrative?

4 hours ago, candide said:

It's a hoax, but it's a ridiculous MAGA hoax. It was not claimed that Russia hacked the voting infrastructure.  It's just the usual MAGA confusion tactics for the gullible! 

 

"Gabbard’s claim relies heavily on an alleged contradiction between a Jan. 6, 2017, intelligence assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an “influence campaign” in an attempt to help elect Donald Trump and earlier intelligence assessments that concluded Russia did not successfully use cyberattacks on election infrastructure in the 2016 election. But those two assessments are not in contradiction."

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2025/07/gabbards-misleading-coup-claim/

I have a question for you.   Why did 66% of Democrats think that Russia changed the vote count?  

One that gotaway from the future Commie/Socialist Party...

ex advisor to Bill Clinton and Harvard /Harris pollster.

 

 

 

Tulsi refers often to irrefutable Evidence !

0:23 second clip

 

 

37 minutes ago, TedG said:

It was debunked.  There is no real evidece.    You posted a link from 2016 which is before the 2017 hearings. 

It was not debunked. The Crowdstrike ceo confirmed his claim. It was also not the only case of interference.

You are grasping at straws! 

26 minutes ago, TedG said:

Why did the press push a false narrative?

The press did not push the narrative that Russia hacked the voting infrastructure and altered votes. (Nor did Obama). 

Just now, candide said:

The press did not push the narrative that Russia hacked the voting infrastructure and altered votes. (Nor did Obama). 

Yes, the press did push a hacking narrative.   I proved it with a video of the pressing doing so.