webfact Posted July 24 Posted July 24 File photo courtesy of Wikipedia Explosive news for royal watchers and Hollywood insiders alike: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's $100 million Netflix deal will not be renewed after it expires in 2025. Sources reveal this decision aligns with a "shift in Netflix’s broader business strategy," though insiders confirm there’s amicability between both parties. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex first inked their Netflix contract in 2020 but will part ways after a series of content releases. Their Archewell Productions showcased projects like "With Love, Meghan” and the "Harry & Meghan" docuseries. Despite the conclusion of their deal, the second season of "With Love, Meghan" is set to continue, featuring celebrities such as Mindy Kaling and Abigail Spencer. Anonymous sources confirm that the decision to not renew the contract is not motivated by hostility, stating that "things have simply reached their conclusion." Both Netflix and the royal couple have declined to comment further at this time. After departing from royal duties in 2020, Harry and Meghan launched their venture into the world of entertainment, promising to create inspiring content. Their productions included a mix of personal insights and larger social narratives like "Heart of Invictus" and "Live to Lead." Responses to the couple’s media foray have received mixed reviews. High-profile commentators, including Meghan McCain, have criticised some of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's work as lacking relatability and excitement. McCain, condemning the Duchess’s lifestyle docuseries, stated, "I cannot stand her. I love people that I can relate to." Despite varying public opinions, the duo remains focused on producing content with a message, aiming to reach extensive audiences through Netflix’s platform. This latest development signals a strategic shift not only for the streaming giant but for the Sussexes as well, as they contemplate their future projects and partnerships. In summary, the royal couple's high-profile Netflix partnership, marked by both excitement and scepticism, will come to a close in 2025, reflecting broader changes in the entertainment industry. They have not made any further comments, but their departure from Netflix will usher in a new era for both parties involved. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Entertainment Weekly via Yahoo! 2025-07-25 3 2
Popular Post daveAustin Posted July 24 Popular Post Posted July 24 Unsurprising. They’re likely a pain to deal with. Proper pair of entitled spoiled brats. 7 4 5 1
Popular Post JonnyF Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 They have no talent. After selling out the Royal Family with nasty lies for their 30 pieces of silver they had nothing left to offer. Openly mocked on late night TV shows, Family Guy and South Park. Looks fading. Money running out. Couldn't have happened to a nicer couple. 5 6 1
JonnyF Posted July 25 Posted July 25 3 hours ago, daveAustin said: Unsurprising. They’re likely a pain to deal with. Proper pair of entitled spoiled brats. Don't write them off yet. Harry still has the interview with Trump and Putin about childhood trauma up his sleeve. Gold I tell you. Gold. 😃 https://nypost.com/2023/06/22/prince-harry-pitched-podcast-on-childhood-trauma-with-trump-putin/ 1
KhunLA Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Don't think they care, as already multi millionaires, to the tune of $50-60M
Popular Post JonnyF Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 1 hour ago, KhunLA said: Don't think they care, as already multi millionaires, to the tune of $50-60M If they were tax exempt and hadn't spent any money for the past 6 years that might be the case. Back in reality, they have massive outgoings for staff, PR, travel and security and desperately need an income, hence them starting the process of crawling back to Charles for a handout now they've been binned by Netflix. https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/prince-harry-meghan-markle-held-peace-talks-with-king-charles-aide-for-handouts-after-dead-netflix-deal/news-story/3b91a2f2282b7b6dc7d0984c2ef9727b My prediction? Broke within 2 years and then divorced shortly after. Harry back in England sitting in the naughty corner with the dunce's hat on. Meghan with the kids looking for an ageing Billionaire. Stamp it. 3 1 2 1 1
KhunLA Posted July 25 Posted July 25 24 minutes ago, JonnyF said: If they were tax exempt and hadn't spent any money for the past 6 years that might be the case. Back in reality, they have massive outgoings for staff, PR, travel and security and desperately need an income, hence them starting the process of crawling back to Charles for a handout now they've been binned by Netflix. https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/prince-harry-meghan-markle-held-peace-talks-with-king-charles-aide-for-handouts-after-dead-netflix-deal/news-story/3b91a2f2282b7b6dc7d0984c2ef9727b My prediction? Broke within 2 years and then divorced shortly after. Harry back in England sitting in the naughty corner with the dunce's hat on. Meghan with the kids looking for an ageing Billionaire. Stamp it. Emphasis on 'NET' worth ... 1
Popular Post quake Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 Harry the Traitor to the Royal Family. He should be in the Tower of London. 1 2 2
Popular Post JonnyF Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 33 minutes ago, Thingamabob said: Rumour is they're running out of money. Yes, they are. The amount they received from Netflix was nothing like the amount reported, once production costs and tax were deducted it would have been far, far less than the headline figure. Maybe 25 million over 5 years, which has already been spent on security, staff, the house, PR, court cases etc. They'll be skint within 2 years. Meghan won't hang around once the residual benefits are no longer there to fuel her narcissism. 4 2 1
DezLez Posted July 25 Posted July 25 2 hours ago, Real Name Hidden said: Will anyone miss this programming? What programming?
PETERTHEEATER Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Oh no! I shall start a GoFundMe campaign asap. Who's with me? 😋 1
lamyai3 Posted July 25 Posted July 25 Most overrated couple since John and Yoko. Maybe they could pose nude together on an album cover like two virgins. 1 1
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 10 hours ago, webfact said: Both Netflix and the royal couple have declined to comment further at this time. They are not a Royal couple 2 2 1
KhunLA Posted July 25 Posted July 25 8 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said: They are not a Royal couple Yes, they are, and he's is still 5th in line to the throne. She could be Queen 2
Liverpool Lou Posted July 25 Posted July 25 11 hours ago, JonnyF said: far less than the headline figure. Maybe 25 million over 5 years, which has already been spent on security, staff, the house, PR, court cases etc. That's interesting. How did you get your hands on their accounts? 1 3
Liverpool Lou Posted July 25 Posted July 25 8 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said: They are not a Royal couple Yes, they are. 1
Nick Carter icp Posted July 25 Posted July 25 5 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: Yes, they are. Harry resigned and he had his Royal title removed 1 1 1
Nick Carter icp Posted July 25 Posted July 25 18 minutes ago, KhunLA said: Yes, they are, and he's is still 5th in line to the throne. She could be Queen But, Harry and Meghan made the choice to give up their His / Her Royal Highness (HRH) titles when they left the Royal family meaning that they won't be referred to by their "Royal" names and an update on the Royal Family's official website in August 2023 has made it official. https://britishheritage.com/royals/harry-duke-sussex-prince 1 1
KhunLA Posted July 25 Posted July 25 27 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said: But, Harry and Meghan made the choice to give up their His / Her Royal Highness (HRH) titles when they left the Royal family meaning that they won't be referred to by their "Royal" names and an update on the Royal Family's official website in August 2023 has made it official. https://britishheritage.com/royals/harry-duke-sussex-prince You might want to actually read the link you posted ... 1
Popular Post Nick Carter icp Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 34 minutes ago, KhunLA said: You might want to actually read the link you posted ... By Birthright , but hes had the Royal title removed and hes longer longer part of the Royal family 2 1
Popular Post theshu25 Posted July 25 Popular Post Posted July 25 1 hour ago, KhunLA said: Yes, they are, and he's is still 5th in line to the throne. She could be Queen His real father is not even a royal. 1 1 1 1 1
Patong2021 Posted July 25 Posted July 25 33 minutes ago, theshu25 said: His real father is not even a royal. Nonsense. That is your unsubstantiated belief. The false claim was based on a previously discredited rumour made that appeared in the tabloids. Have you reviewed his DNA profile and a comparison to that of Charles and Diana? Has anyone? If not, then you do not have any basis to make that claim. Even if he had a third party biological father, he is recognized by Charles as his son and that is all that matters. 1 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now